posted on Feb, 27 2011 @ 06:53 AM
reply to post by Fedge
If the first mug shot was made to look more evil, then we have to ask who tampered with the photo? Since the lapdog media pushed the photo onto the
public in sync, it was most likely the authorities that did so, in that case the entire trial should be thrown out due to an attempt to deceive the
public into having a pre-conceived notion of evil for the defendant. Which is perhaps why the judge of the trial allowed the release of the second
photo, the one perhaps less photoshopped, in a pathetic attempt at recalibrating the mind's view of the defendant. Either way the judge says his
reasoning for releasing the second photo despite the defense's argument that it violates the defendants privacy rights was the second photo looked
more "tame" so even the judge can see the amount of influence the first photo had.
My first reaction was that the first photo shows he was on drugs. Maybe '___'. The goofy smile, the strange eyes, and the puffy face. He looks fried,
if you know the expression. Plus if he was being mind controlled those drugs may have been part of the operation. Whether he was on drugs, or
photoshopped, or either, the case by this point has lost all credibility, which is why when I asked to see the video surveillance tape so many people
said "but, but, it'll tamper with the trial." Sorry, it has already been tampered with beyond recognition. This is why I am strangely attracted to
this theory about TPTB replacing Loughner with a look-a-like, the reason being that it is a far fetched theory, however the facts do seem to indicate
different "Loughner's" at each instance, and with the public foaming at the mouth for his execution, it would be just like TPTB to eliminate him
while the public was still waiting for him to get sentenced. Just another indication of their complete control over the minds of their sheep. Or maybe
not, we'll have to see.