It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by copernicus2012
Just an idea.......but i mean when Russia fell nukes went missing FACT......pretty sure some of these nations that you dont think have them MOST CERTAINLY DO..
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
Most likely the Iranians are seeking to draw the Israelis into a conventional conflict that will eventually bring other Middle Eastern nations into the war.. This could drag on for quite a while, with great costs to both sides... Before it goes nuclear.
Israel is threatening to sink two Iranian ships in international waters but it's Iran trying to start a fight??
Gotta love that logic..
Three German-built Israeli submarines equipped with nuclear cruise missiles are to be deployed in the Gulf near the Iranian coastline.
The first has been sent in response to Israeli fears that ballistic missiles developed by Iran, Syria and Hezbollah, a political and military organisation in Lebanon, could hit sites in Israel, including air bases and missile launchers.
The submarines of Flotilla 7 — Dolphin, Tekuma and Leviathan — have visited the Gulf before. But the decision has now been taken to ensure a permanent presence of at least one of the vessels.
So... who's provoking who again?
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
I'm sure you had a point but I just don't see it..
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
Originally posted by backinblack
reply to post by Fractured.Facade
I'm sure you had a point but I just don't see it..
Bias provides the blinding comfort of ignorance.
If you fail to see it, I can't help you.
Provoking a nuclear armed enemy without the ability to match your enemy's weaponry would be completely foolish, and suicidal.
Originally posted by Fractured.Facade
Evidence aside... Why would Iran NOT be developing nuclear weapons?
Provoking a nuclear armed enemy without the ability to match your enemy's weaponry would be completely foolish, and suicidal.
Do you really think the Iranians are that stupid?
Also, being threatened by a nuclear armed enemy and not preparing an equally devastating defense would be foolish.
By the way, they could already have a strong enough nuclear arsenal, with the aid of their nuclear allies.
Most likely the Iranians are seeking to draw the Israelis into a conventional conflict that will eventually bring other Middle Eastern nations into the war.. This could drag on for quite a while, with great costs to both sides... Before it goes nuclear.
Hope that nothing happens, but do not assume that Iran is not arming itself and preparing.
This new drilling is expected to raise U.S. production by at least 20 percent over the next five years. And within 10 years, it could help reduce oil imports by more than half, advancing a goal that has long eluded policymakers.
Originally posted by bluemirage5
Egypt won't allow Iranian ships through the Suez anyhow.....just big talk from Iran that amounts to NOTHING as usual.
Al-Arabiya: White House confirms two Iranian warships heading to Syria
The United States said Wednesday it will be watching two ships in the Red Sea that Israel has identified as Iranian, adding it wanted "to see what they do."
Israel claims Tehran is sending two ships into the Suez Canal for the first time in 30 years, saying it is a "hostile" act.
"Tonight two Iranian warships are supposed to cross the Suez Canal into the Mediterranean Sea on their way to Syria," Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman said earlier at a conference of American Jewish leaders in Jerusalem.
"The Suez Canal authority allows all ships of any nationality to cross as long as the country is not in a state of war with Egypt," the Authority said in a statement, noting "it would be the first time Iranian warships have used the Suez Canal since 1979."
Originally posted by Bicent76
Irianian warships passing thru the Suez Canel, crude prices sky rocket..
Wow, just the movement of destroyers raises the prices on OIL. This is a odd move, with allot of significants. The middle east is more unstable now and testy then it has been since the 80's. Dang right people need to be alert and keep an eye on Asia minor. Sure could be same ole same ole, but still a lil testy round those parts right now.
I still find it interesting just the movement of destroyers implicates oil prices, according to msm.edit on 16-2-2011 by Bicent76 because: (no reason given)