It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AdAstra
reply to post by blupblup
Personally I abhor the idea of living off the land.
It is also much, much, MUCH more difficult than people here seem to imagine.
And it is repetitive.
And it is highly insecure. A year's hard work can be wiped out in a few minutes.
So, I for one am very happy that I live in a society where the "bartering" process has been replaced by euros. ;-)
BlupBlup, you talk about travelling.... Why don't you, then?
Can you see yourself as a travel writer? Or a travel guide?
Or working on an airplane, a ship, etc.?
If so, go for it.
There are also many other things one can do - yes, work - while travelling.
I doubt you would really enjoy all "fun" and no work. Not for long, anyway.
Exactly. Many dont seem to realize how brutally hard substinance farming can be. And these same people would most likely want this kind of communism (isnt what this really is? all living as one on a commune?), would not want fertilizers used. Hell, there would be no such thing besides manure. And no farm equiptment, as the infrastructure required to manufacture such products would not exist.
So starvation would once again become common. Not to mention farming can be back breaking work. You would most likely work 10-12 hours a day and possibly though most weekends.
[somehow have free or "traded" travel anywhere in the world, then that would be fine
Originally posted by AdAstra
BlupBlup, you talk about travelling.... Why don't you, then?
Can you see yourself as a travel writer? Or a travel guide?
Or working on an airplane, a ship, etc.?
If so, go for it.
There are also many other things one can do - yes, work - while travelling.
I doubt you would really enjoy all "fun" and no work. Not for long, anyway.
Originally posted by ATC_GOD
Ok so how the heck do you expect to get from where ever you live to Europe if no one works.
They complain about how the want to go back to living in simpler ways, but would never in a million years give up their Blackberry or Facebook.
Unsatisfied with your job? Get a new one! Unqualified for a better job? Work two lesser jobs, save up and educate yourself. It is in your power to do these things. Unsatisfied with your government? Form or join a lobby group with goals similar to your own. Hell, run for office! DO SOMTHING ABOUT IT!
The point is, no one is going to do it for you. Nor should anyone, especially the government do it for you.
Those who have given up and refuse to work because they say their are only feeding the rich are lazy sods who are trying desperately to justify their actions while at the same time being a tax burden on the working folk. Working people contribute to society as a whole, capable people who decide to leech off the welfare system are a drain and parasite on our economy. Who do you think im mad at?
Originally posted by nightbringr
Exactly. Many dont seem to realize how brutally hard substinance farming can be. And these same people would most likely want this kind of communism (isnt what this really is? all living as one on a commune?), would not want fertilizers used. Hell, there would be no such thing besides manure. And no farm equiptment, as the infrastructure required to manufacture such products would not exist.
So starvation would once again become common. Not to mention farming can be back breaking work. You would most likely work 10-12 hours a day and possibly though most weekends.
Originally posted by Golden Boy
I don't think that you actually lose half of your income to taxation, unless you're one of the big earners that this thread is railing against. This picture illustrates the tax rates for high- and low-income citizens in the United States for the past few decades:
Originally posted by Golden Boy
So you actually lose about ten percent of your total income to income taxes.
Originally posted by Golden Boy
And I don't think that anyone would argue that taxation is entirely unnecessary. Governments are, first and foremost, tasked with maintaining the country's prosperity. This means that they need to defend the country from external threats, maintain the country's roadways, and pay the salaries of politicians.
Originally posted by Golden Boy
Of course, there are actually many, many more things that governments do, but for the sake of discussion we'll just use those three, since we don't really need a hugely in-depth look at it to get the idea.
Originally posted by Golden Boy
Then we have sales tax. Again, the amount of money that is required to maintain the country each year is absolutely staggering. Ten percent off the top from America's households simply doesn't cut it. Sales tax is put in place as a way to fill the gap.
Originally posted by Golden Boy
Now, you can argue that tax rates are too high, but ten percent isn't really all that much. Yes, the government wastes a lot of money, but that's a problem with the federal budget rather than the taxation system, and it would be better to take it up with your Congressman than with the IRS.
Originally posted by Golden Boy
For all intents and purposes, when speaking economically, governments are huge businesses which provide maintenance for a country. You are taxed because the company has to collect on its services. If you don't want to pay for the government's actions, leave the country. If you're here, after all, you're enjoying the same benefits that paying customers (citizens) do, but without paying - in other words, if you don't pay taxes, you're stealing.
Originally posted by Golden Boy
So the government isn't just taking your money for no reason. Again, there are no Snidely Whiplash machinations going on. It's just business. The government does what it has to do to maintain the country. If you're unhappy with the services provided, vote to change policy or leave the country.
Originally posted by Golden Boy
As for bloated oil prices, that's not really the government's fault. Again, it's simple economics. Demand for oil is high. Amazingly so, in fact. Supply of oil is low. Not incredibly low, but lower than the demand. That makes prices skyrocket. And, yes, businesses jack up the price even further. Again, they're running businesses for one reason and one reason only: to make money. They aren't trying to destroy the lower classes; they're just making as much money as they can.
Demand for oil is fairly static. We need oil. It's not a choice. We have to have it. This means that the price can go as high as it wants to, and we will pay it, because we have to. The only thing regulating oil prices are the companies themselves. This means that there are two things which might happen: a price war and a group pricing.
In the former, the companies compete with each other, lowering their prices as far as they are willing to. We have to have the oil, but we don't want to pay more than absolutely necessary, so we'll buy from the company which offers us the lowest price. This won't lower the price by too much, but it does keep it from going completely astronomical. In this scenario, only one oil company gets the money from the consumers, because they're the only one that is charging the low price.
In the latter, the companies get together and decide to share revenue by setting a common price for oil which all of them will charge. This means that the price can go as high or low as they want it to without any company missing out. All of them get some revenue, but it's not as much as if they had gone into a price war. Odds are that this is what's going on right now.
So even the oil prices aren't evil conspiracies to keep the working man in bondage slavery. Your current condition is very, very far from slavery, in fact. I appreciate hyperbole as much as the next man, but that's going a little far. The fact that you're pretty much stuck in your current condition isn't a conspiracy against you, and it certainly isn't slavery. It's just economics.
Originally posted by CholmondleyWarner
Oh yes, work is fantastic...
My good friend earns a fortune. He travels around Europe, never works less than twelve hours a day, hardly sees his wife and kids and spends his weekends fast asleep! Yes, he has a lovely home... Yes, he owns an expensive car... And, yes, for a fortnight every year he has a lovely holiday abroad....
But is he really living!?
I would rather be poor and live my life to the full than miss my life and let it pass me by because I was too busy making someone else a millionaire why my own kids forgot what it was like to spend an afternoon of fun with their dad....
Originally posted by AdAstra
You can have that right now. It's called "couch surfing" or something.
It's not my idea of travelling, but apparently thousands do it.
PS. Yep, I remembered corrrectly. Here it is:
www.couchsurfing.org...