It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DragonSpirit2
reply to post by Max_TO
I know this is hard to believe but reverse osmosis water is not good for you, it's not bad for you it's just not good for you either. Essentially reverse osmosis water is "dead" it has no vitamins or minerals in it like water should. The best water for you is actually water from say a REAL mountain spring fed stream or something like that or water run through a Berkey water system.
I've read most of the comments, anyone mention air pollution, perfumes, legal and illegal drugs such as smokes,alchohol, home made designer drugs, ect.......?
Originally posted by Twainfan
only saw this mentioned once but it's worth repeating.. BPA (bisphenol A) is in all food cans and in most plastics. Microwaving your food (that came from a can) in a plastic container releases even more of this stuff. a little video about it: www.youtube.com... it causes breast and testicular cancer, diabetes and hyperactivity.
Another thing to look for is Hydrogenated oils! These things are basically plastics in liquid form. It's been argued that before hydrogenated oils were developed, there was no such thing as type 2 diabetes. I have personal proof of this stuff causing problems. I developed eczema on my leg .. after countless hours of researching I found out about hydrogenated oils. I have since cut all of these oils from my diet and the eczema cleared up. The body cannot handle these artificial oils so it tries to excrete it out thru the skin causing all sorts of skin problems (acne, eczema, psoriosis etc). For those that would argue against that... hydrogenated oils are a preservative.. if they can keep food from spoiling for months (if not years) on the shelf, what does that stuff do to your body?
Originally posted by hypervalentiodine
Originally posted by DragonSpirit2
reply to post by hypervalentiodine
"In terms of you claims regarding aluminium, I mean that there are no articles that I know of that have investigated its affects. So we don't actually know if it's good or bad because nothing has been done on it."
Relationship between aluminum and alzheimers does exist
Aluminum info and studies
3 Personal Hygeine Mistakes That Could Be Harming Your Health
" If so, then the reason these studies were discounted was because every other study published after the ones published by the guy peddling Laetrile found that it not only had no statistically significant affect in terms of treating cancer, it was also lethal to the subject. There have been multiple instances of people dying following consumption of either one of amygdalin or Laetrile due to cyanide poisoning."
Why We Are Losing The War On Cancer (B17 Laetrile)
Informative article on the stance many holistic physicians and naturopaths are taking regarding B17 Laetrile and cyanide poisoning
Originally posted by DragonSpirit2
reply to post by hypervalentiodine
Same thing is more than likely true about all of the other things mentioned and I for one am not risking it. It has been theorized, studied, and scrutinized and some people say it's bad also some people say it's not.......Just because the mainstream media and/or medical journal magazines haven't published it doesn't mean there's no proof or that these are unfounded claims.......
But this isn't just in medical journals. The information I got was from a range of scientific publications. You don't want to risk these things based on claims by people with no either credentials and/or no actual data to back up their claims, and that's fine, it's your choice and I'm not going to sit here tell you that you must reconsider. I personally like to base my opinion off scientific literature and the data that they present, but that's my years as a scientist talking. I would never trust any mainstream media or alternative media journalist article that is relaying scientific information. More often than not, these articles are riddled with errors and misguided 'truths' that either puts the science out of context or completely misquotes what it means (i.e. it's just wrong). Anyway, back on topic. There is no proof that your aluminium thing is an unfounded claim just as there is also no proof that it is founded - that's what I meant.
That's totally cool I understand.
*sister
OOOPS
And neither am I. As I may have eluded to, I have a science education and so I like coming into these threads simply so that I can debate the science, not so I can actively sway people's opinions.edit on 8-2-2011 by hypervalentiodine because: (no reason given)edit on 8-2-2011 by hypervalentiodine because: (no reason given)
Well as you can see I'm into the alternative side of things. I just graduated Massage Therapy School, so I just had 6 months of college level A&P, Kinesiology, and Pathology. My sister is a holistic healthcare practitioner, nutritional consultant, and master herbalist, and she owns her own natural hygiene products company and website. So a lot of what I get comes from her study materials she is being sent by a holistic college in order to get a Bachelor's degree. So I'm not just quoting articles, but actual holistic study materials from a college out of Cali.
Originally posted by DragonSpirit2
Did anyone know that "scientifically" margarine is one molecule away from being plastic.
Your right the quality of life is the key,you see the increase of dementia,alzheimers,parkinsons,rheumetiod arthritis only to name a few.Who would want to live a long life under these conditions?I didn't know anything about these chemicals until my son was diagnosed with a condition that is directly linked to aspartame,that was two years ago and I have changed what we eat,to the shampoo we use and drink bottled water.I do have a well but I'm sure that's polluted also.I also question some conditions that came out of nowhere back in the 80's when aspartame first hit the market,I carried a tumor(size of a grapefruit) on my placenta when I was pregnant with my second child,my Dr never found out why I had it.and I didn't have a clue about aspartame back then.This angers me so much,never will I trust the government and the agencies under them.
Originally posted by mutantgenius
Originally posted by Gixxer
how do you explain the avg life expectancy as high as it is now , compared to 100 years ago since all of this stuff is so bad?
I don't really have any facts to back this up...but....I think the average life expectancy is in decline....cancer, chidhood diabetes, strokes and heart attacks in 20-30 yr olds, wars etc.. I don't think we can really say that our generation is going to live quite a long life as our grandparents, who by the way, weren't exposed to half the # in their formative years of growth as our children are. Its all cummulative. Also, what's the quality of life going to be in those latter years? Especially for someone who is morbidly obese, imagine carrying all that weight around on your old, brittle bones? Or an elderly person on agressive chemo-therapy? That's my opinion.
Originally posted by DragonSpirit2
reply to post by hypervalentiodine
Relationship between aluminum and alzheimers does exist
Aluminum info and studies
3 Personal Hygeine Mistakes That Could Be Harming Your Health
Originally posted by DragonSpirit2
reply to post by hypervalentiodine
Why We Are Losing The War On Cancer (B17 Laetrile)
Informative article on the stance many holistic physicians and naturopaths are taking regarding B17 Laetrile and cyanide poisoning
Originally posted by TWILITE22
Your right the quality of life is the key,you see the increase of dementia,alzheimers,parkinsons,rheumetiod arthritis only to name a few.Who would want to live a long life under these conditions?I didn't know anything about these chemicals until my son was diagnosed with a condition that is directly linked to aspartame,that was two years ago and I have changed what we eat,to the shampoo we use and drink bottled water.I do have a well but I'm sure that's polluted also.I also question some conditions that came out of nowhere back in the 80's when aspartame first hit the market,I carried a tumor(size of a grapefruit) on my placenta when I was pregnant with my second child,my Dr never found out why I had it.and I didn't have a clue about aspartame back then.This angers me so much,never will I trust the government and the agencies under them.
Originally posted by moleskin
Great post and I think, if we can expand it to focus on the DO's and Guidelines rather than the Don'ts - then as its more positive in nature and direct in action it might act as a great guide for others to follow.
What I do know is that you don't need to be a scientist to realize we, as humans, are a part of the natural chain of things. We are connected to all things natural as they are to us. Whilst we like to separate ourselves from the natural world, we are still enslaved to it in some ways.
BUT by using the terms enslaved, what I really mean is dependent upon it for our food and nutrition. Therefore it makes perfect sense that the more natural or in-line with nature we eat, the healthier our minds and bodies should also be.
We have evolved from a survival perspective far better than most creatures on this planet. We have a massive range of foods available to support our growth, health and well-being. But we were never designed to take on-board excessive levels of dangerous metals and/or chemicals. At some point or another our systems will trip up as a result - be it through illness or disease.
Natural Pregnancy Rates are down, gender benders are on the up, as is obesity, auto immune diseases. Maybe the science hasn't yet connected the dots, but surely, a healthy body and mind can only be achieved through the most natural, and dare I say it, sustainable practices we can work with?
There is an irony in the world presently, the Westernized Populations are grossly overweight, consuming too much garbage, whilst many of the human race in non Westernized (underdeveloped) countries are severely underweight. What unites those two groups is that both are most probably malnourished - neither consumes anything of real nutritional quality. What is sad is that the overconsumption spent on food by westernized people could be re-directed to sustainable farming practices on a macro scale... but thats a whole other subject.
My tips or suggestions:
1. Grow as much fruit, veg and herbs as possible. This instantly removes some of the power of Big Corporate. Say no to convenience and get out there and tend to your vegie patches or planters. It's amazing how many people fill their gardens with nice trees, plants and flowers, yet have NO food coming from them - what a waste of soil, water etc etc. The other effect of growing as much as possible is simple, reduced carbon emissions from the food journey going out into the atmosphere - adding pollution to air/water systems.
2. Recycle - and no I am not talking about plastics etc - I am talking about food wastes and scraps. A few options here:
a - Get some Chickens - they love food scraps, and in return can help fertilize ground with a nice healthy by-product known as eggs - a great source of protein!!!!
b - Compost - yep, free fertilizer - probably not quite organic, but composting food wastes is a great way of keeping naturally degradable products from landfill, whilst creating a great substance for adding to your plants, thereby replacing some of the nutrients lost through the growing process.
c - Water - yes water too can be recycled. This ignores the flouride aspects, but your shower water, washing up water etc could all be used to water non food plants. Switching to environmentally friendly cleaning products severely lessons any impact these products have on the environment to almost none.
3. Eat Seasonally - yes we would all love bright red apples all year round, but lets be really honest here, how good do they taste all year round? Again storage of these perishables all year round is a massive strain on the environment. The foods need to be chilled and most probably caked in preservatives in order to look nice on the shelves.
4. Support local farmers/diaries/butchers etc - most but probably not all of the pre-mentioned groups have a great knowledge of the foods they produce and/or distribute. Years ago I worked for my uncle as a butcher kid assisting on the weekends and he knew the farms his meat came from. It cost slightly more, but it was fresh and superior in terms of nutritional quality when compared with supermarket meats. Again locally sourced produce has a much smaller environmental impact. Plus it keeps the money flow OUT of big corporate hands.
I could go on, but dont want the thread to die lol - but the big issues we face in some ways have been brought about by our love of convenience. We allowed the power of the few to control our food systems in order to have ease of access. The only way to change the system is to change our ways now. Nutritionally rich food may cost more, but we need a lot less of it to thrive on. I know I have veered slightly from the main chemically based conversation, but there is a massive link between the convenience consumers demand and the cost we pay, either financially or through poor health.
Moley