It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by TheGhostViking
YOU unite the races, personally. each person does that.
any ideology that teaches the opposite, is missing the mark,
from what i can tell (i mean, just observing what transpires around
the world)
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by TheGhostViking
that's why i said, develop it for everyone to take advantage of (if they are personally interested or capable physically. i know that i'm not well enough to go to space, unless it's via some ET high tech thingy (in which case, i'd be asking if they could fix my physical problems, while wer'e out there, flying around lol)
Originally posted by TheGhostViking
we should have have hoverboards now and no diseases liviing til were 170 in cities that float !
but no were too busy seeing if swans like sudoku .
Originally posted by 547000
1) How is the system "fair" if the ones who produce have no choice but to give what they produce to the ones who only consume?
2) Wouldn't severe population control be needed to ensure no one would go hungry?
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by TheGhostViking
we were donating to alot of charities before hubby retired. he was out of work for a year before he could find another job, and in that time, all our bills skyrocketed with additional fees and interest rates. the charities we'd been donating to, called for more donations, and we couldn't help them because we weren't making enough to pay our own bills. long story short, ya first have to make sure you have the money (remember our discussion about south africa?) before you help others with it. if you give your stuff to someone else, when they need your help again, you'll both be broke.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFoxThere is more than enough food in the world to go around. It's just being hoarded, and wasted.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFoxThe same applies around the world. In Brazil, people are going hungry, while massive tracts of land are cleared to grow tons of corn... which all goes to cattle who take up even more land than the corn... which mostly gets exported to our fat, colon cancer-having asses here in the US. Think about how wasteful that is.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFoxThink of how much wheat and barley is blown on making Budweiser, and compare it to the people in Mali who are desperate for a bread crust.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFoxHunger is rampant in India, even among the communities that grow a lot of food, because our "charity" carries a debt with interest that the farmers must pay by selling all their crops - and which leads to widespread suicides when they can't make the debt, and see their children going hungry while shipping out tons of produce.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFoxAll that's needed is proper management of resources and a real effort to reduce waste, both in terms of food, and the land used to produce the food.
Originally posted by Visitor2012
It could mean freedom for a few decades, but we would have to get rid of the scarcity economic structure. All human needs wouldn't have a dollar value, they would be free. Everyone would work their talents to contribute to the growth and health of Earth and every living thing on her. A Global Christ conscience would hold it all together quite nicely. We could PARTY!!! SING and DANCE!!!
Originally posted by TheGhostViking
reply to post by marinesniper0351
"where is the incentive to be creative and invent if we all were equal, the world would suffer"
I value a humans right to NOT die of starvation over creativity , the world IS suffering because we are not equal !
Originally posted by Golf66
Originally posted by TheWalkingFoxThere is more than enough food in the world to go around. It's just being hoarded, and wasted.
So is oxygen - its being used up by people who continue to procreate without the means to support their offspring. If a company or person trades something of value for the food it is theirs to do with as they see fit; to eat it, give it away or to watch it slowly rot on the shelves. It is not for you, me or anyone to make them give it for free to anyone else.
If you lack something of value to trade be it in the form of money, goods or services in exchange for food and lack the ability to procure it legally for yourself - I guess you are just going to be hungry. Life is not fair.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFoxThe same applies around the world. In Brazil, people are going hungry, while massive tracts of land are cleared to grow tons of corn... which all goes to cattle who take up even more land than the corn... which mostly gets exported to our fat, colon cancer-having asses here in the US. Think about how wasteful that is.
Guess it sucks to not have money or a skill to earn any to get food. The land belongs to the land owner who can do with it anything he/she desires. I have cattle I could raise grain instead I guess and give it away but then what would I exchange for goods and services? That would be suicide.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFoxThink of how much wheat and barley is blown on making Budweiser, and compare it to the people in Mali who are desperate for a bread crust.
Sucks to be born in Mali then I guess - I bet if they were willing to pay more for the grain than Budweiser the farmers would gladly send it there. It’s a concept called capitalism and it runs under the theory of competition.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFoxHunger is rampant in India, even among the communities that grow a lot of food, because our "charity" carries a debt with interest that the farmers must pay by selling all their crops - and which leads to widespread suicides when they can't make the debt, and see their children going hungry while shipping out tons of produce.
Then they should not accept the "charity" and grow their own food then. Entirely their choice as I see it.
Originally posted by TheWalkingFoxAll that's needed is proper management of resources and a real effort to reduce waste, both in terms of food, and the land used to produce the food.
I think by management you mean confiscation of private property for "managed" redistribution to the poor - that's is a failed concept since people have no incentive to produce if they cannot enjoy the fruits of their labor. Communism as it is commonly known is a failed experiment.
It is a nice sentiment to care for those in need but to forcibly take from one person regardless of their relative wealth (be that force of law or point of a gun) and give it to someone else despite their relative “need” is called theft and is pretty much frowned upon in any society.
edit on 4/2/2011 by Golf66 because: (no reason given)edit on 4/2/2011 by Golf66 because: (no reason given)edit on 4/2/2011 by Golf66 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheGhostVikingyou sound like Cecil Rhodes and no thats not a compliment . Views like yours are shared by those who justify raping and pillaging foreign countries in order to expand Empires and are the reason people are dying of starvation while the fat cats make profit out of misery and legalised slavery .