It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The radioactive particles are attracted to the neodymium core.
Originally posted by beebs
I am sorry, but answers to your questions can only be found in your own investigation. I don't think I can elaborate on it any more than I already have. Also, I am looking at its operations through my interpretation of physics, which is not necessarily the same as Searl's.
I do not have the time to transcribe an entire interview, there is like 6 parts - turn your speakers up. And it isn't just Searl talking, the other guys talk as well and are more clear.
I recommend the John Searl Story documentary for the basics of his life and the operations of the SEG... there might be a torrent out there somewhere.
The youtube account TheRealVerbz has quite a lot of material for you to study as well.
Originally posted by -PLB-
As for the interview, I don't want you to make a transcript yourself of course .
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Bearden is featured in the first 5 1/2 minutes of this video (the rest is an ad for a DVD). He talks about the need for an overhaul of classical electrodynamics. He says that the EM wave in the vacuum flux is like a sound wave, that it's longitudinal, not transverse, and that Tesla knew this from his experiments.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Science becoming dogma, among other things, is discussed in this 8 part interview of Tom Bearden taped in 2001: "Applied Scalar Wave Technology - Tom Bearden interview 1 of 8"
Originally posted by Mary Rose
reply to post by Mary Rose
In 4 of 8, Bearden mentions Sach's Unified Field Theory. Maybe this is it: "Unified Field Theory Mendel Sachs."
I find this an very unsatisfying response. My answers can only be found by watching hours and hours of Youtube videos? I am not going to engage in that.
As for the interview, I don't want you to make a transcript yourself of course . But maybe you knew one available somewhere. I may give it another try. But he has to come with something convincing real quick, I don't really care about his dreams to be honest.
It's even worse in the interview.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Out of many pieces of mindless mumbo-jumbo in this quote from Searl, this one stands out:
The radioactive particles are attracted to the neodymium core.
Part 2 4:15 Fernando Morris
we're dealing with a different kind of electricity here...
With the SEG it actually forms a pair of electrons, or a boson
You still get the electric currents and all that, it's just that it behaves more like a photon.
When it does exit the machine, it splits up again and you see a little bit of a halo, because photons are being emitted"
Rich : Photons emerge?
Fernando:between material layers, using the hall effect
That's how photons are compressed
Once they become a pair of electrons it no longer behaves like an electron, it behaves like a photon
Therefore it creates high velocities, whereas with normal electricity you only have a drift current of a fraction of an inch per second.
By the time they exit, they could be going near the speed of light
Rich:It's kind of hard to get my head around because this wasn't included in my electrical engineering degree, it's merging into physics
Part 3 4:00
Searl: on scaling up the SEG to the size of the Earth/moon:
make plate size of planet earth
and roller size of moon
The distance at which that roller would go around is the same distance as the moon to the Earth
The same laws are applied.
This is almost as many breakthroughs at the same time as Marko Rodin, not only free energy, but superconducting with ordinary materials on top of it, not to mention antigravity, and solving the global warming problem, etc etc.
Part 3 continued
4:49 superconducting element of this, have you measured any change in temperature?
Fernando "I'm not at that stage yet, that's why we're looking for more funding and resources"
6:10 The SEG has Two modes, above superconductivity it becomes a generator, below it becomes a transportation device
Originally posted by Mary Rose
All truth-seekers need to read Walter Russell's A New Concept of the Universe.
IV
THE COULOMB LAW MISCONCEPTION
The Coulomb law statement that opposites attract and likes repel is not true to Natural law.
Opposite conditions ARE opposite conditions. Likewise. they are opposite effects caused by each thrusting in opposite directions. It is not logical to say that opposites fulfill any other office than to OPPOSE. Nor is it logical to say that opposing things attract each other.
In all this universe, like conditions seek like conditions. Gases and vapors seek gases and vapors by rising to find them. Liquids and solids seek liquids and solids by falling toward them.
Radiating matter seeks a radiating condition in the outward direction of radiation. Gravitating matter seeks the inward radial direction of condensation to find its like condition.
Opposite poles of a bar magnet thrust away from each other as far as they can go. That is the very purpose of the electric current which divides the universal equilibrium. If opposite poles attracted each other they would have to be together in the middle, instead of "pushing" away from each other to the very ends.
When depolarization takes place the poles seem to draw closer together, but that is because of their lessening vitality. They still thrust away from each other until devitalization is complete. When motion ceases, the matter which it manifests ceases to be.
Scientific observers have been deceived by their senses into thinking that opposites attract each other because of seeing the north pole of one magnet "pull" toward the south pole of another magnet.
The fact that opposite polarities void each other when thus contacted has not been considered as a factor in the matter. It is a fact, however, when two opposites are thus brought together by their seeming eagerness to contact each other, both poles cease to be. Each one has voided the other as completely as the chemical opposites sodium and chlorine void each other and leave no trace of either one after that contact.
If the Coulomb law were valid, it would not be possible to gather together one ounce of any one element.
Let's look at that claim, try to mentally scale the roller to the same size as the moon as Searl suggests, then what distance would the moon sized roller "orbit" at? The same distance as the moon from the Earth as Searl claims?
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
Part 3 4:00
Searl: on scaling up the SEG to the size of the Earth/moon:
make plate size of planet earth
and roller size of moon
The distance at which that roller would go around is the same distance as the moon to the Earth
The same laws are applied.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
did you get the part where they say it would be good if the "magnetic bearings" were used in industry? Did they calculate how much energy would be dissipated in eddy currents they say would do the job?
Originally posted by -PLB-
Originally posted by buddhasystem
did you get the part where they say it would be good if the "magnetic bearings" were used in industry? Did they calculate how much energy would be dissipated in eddy currents they say would do the job?
I did some reading on it (well, Wikipedia), and there is also a passive solution. The trick is that the eddy currents are inducted in a rotating conductor by permanent magnets. So the faster the rotation, the stronger the eddy currents.
See this Wiki: en.wikipedia.org...
* Sleeve bearing fans use two surfaces lubricated with oil or grease as a friction contact. ..
* Rifle bearing fans are similar to sleeve bearing, but are quieter and have almost as much lifespan as ball bearings..
* Ball bearing fans use ball bearings. ..
* Fluid bearing fans have the advantages of near-silent operation and high life expectancy (comparable to ball bearing fans). However, these fans tend to be the most expensive..
* Magnetic bearing or maglev fans, in which the fan is repelled from the bearing by magnetism.
the Enlobal bearing, which uses a magnetic field in place of balls or oil. The Enlobal bearing is like a maglev train, in which the train is suspended on a magnetic cushion above the track, with only air between the two. Thus, friction between the moving parts is greatly reduced, since most of the time they are only in contact with the air, not each other. (That said, it is worth pointing out that at least one SPCR user has found that oiling the Enlobal bearing improved both vibration and noise dramatically).
The advantages of reduced friction are not hard to recognize: Less wear, reduced power requirements, less heat produced — and less noise. And, indeed, these are exactly the benefits that Enermax uses to sell the fans that use Enlobal bearings, including the Marathon that we looked at. The question is, how much do these theoretical benefits actually come out in practice? Have Enermax' engineers done a good job implementing the technology? Is it cost effective?
All of these are open questions, and not all are easy to address in a short review. For example, we cannot evaluate longevity or reliability, and Enermax' documentation conspicuously omits any hard numbers in this respect. Even a ballpark MTBF number would be welcome here. What we can examine are things like power, airflow and noise, and our hands-on review showed the Marathon to be unusual in a number of ways.
One things that surprised us initially was how little power it required — and how little the power consumption changed when we adjusted the input voltage. In fact, it required less power per rotation than any other 120mm fan we've tested — and not by a small amount! This stands to reason; with less friction to deal with, the fan's electric motor would not need to work as hard.
2. Consider the possibility that the current model is incorrect or incomplete, and the related possibility that perhaps a person not in your personal circle of friends has figured out something you didn't know/didn't think of already.
3. Research and familiarize yourself with context (yeah, like the other crazies and hoaxers).
4. Do not listen to that voice in your head which says we are all ignorant/crazy/hoaxers/brainsfallingout/etc.
5. Do not conflate the general term of 'free energy' with 'impossible violation of physics', but rather interpret the term as 'new, clean, renewable, different, etc.' with the perpetual motion already existing in the natural world.
Originally posted by beebs
but I understand what he is trying to say - and that is all that matters.
Originally posted by beebs
You would get nowhere in life if all you do is nitpick peoples specific words, interpret them as literally as you can, and then blow the whole thing up into the most magnificent criticism of their ideas as a whole.
First, I said that EM was stronger than Earth's gravity by about 100000000000000000000000000000000000000 times, so don't you understand this statement IS in fact claiming a relationship between them regarding their relative magnitudes? Yet you misrepresent what I wrote and said I won't admit that they are somehow related. So that is a claim of a relationship, which I think even your friend Nassim Haramein has stated. He references this website in his manifesto, have you read this?
Originally posted by beebs
Dude, the way your mind works is so wacky...
Just because you won't admit that gravity and EM have to somehow be related, doesn't mean they aren't related in any way.
And I don't necessarily agree with Searl's terminology, but I understand what he is trying to say - and that is all that matters.
You would get nowhere in life if all you do is nitpick peoples specific words, interpret them as literally as you can, and then blow the whole thing up into the most magnificent criticism of their ideas as a whole.