It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Jesus said, "GOD IS LIGHT," and no man of that day knew what He meant. The day is now here when all men must know what Jesus meant when He said "GOD IS LIGHT."
For within the secret of Light is vast knowledge yet unrevealed to man. Light is all there is; it is all we have to deal with, but we do not yet know what it is. The purpose of this message is to tell what it is.
Today's civilization has advanced far in knowing HOW to deal with matter but we do not know WHAT matter is nor the WHY of it. Nor do we know what energy, electricity, magnetism, gravitation and radiation are. Nor do we know the purpose of the inert gases and WHAT they are. Nor do we know the structure of the elemental atoms nor the gyroscopic principle which determines that structure. Nor are we aware of the fact that this is a two-way continuous universe of balance in all effects of motion and not a one-way discontinuous universe. Nor have we even yet heard of or suspected the most important of all principles in physics, THE VOIDANCE PRINCIPLE and the mirrors and lenses of space which are the cause of illusion in all moving things.
Nor do we even consider the entire material electric universe to be the illusion which it is; there being no reality to it whatsoever.
Nor have we the slightest inkling of the cause of curvature of space, nor the voidance of that curvature in planes of zero curvature at wave field boundaries. No one now knows how it is that crystals get their various shapes. It will amaze the world to know that those shapes of crystals are determined in space by the shapes of the wave fields which bound the various elemental structures.
Nor have we the slightest conception of what constitutes the life principle, nor the principle of growth, nor the simultaneous unfoldment-refoldment principle which repeats all patterns in Nature sequentially and records and voids them as they are repeated. Nor are we aware of that recording principle by means of which the Creator carries forth the sum totals of every sequential cycle in His unfolding and refolding universe unto the very end of its manifestations upon one planet and its beginning on a new one.
Nor are we dynamically aware of the souls and seeds of things. These roots of universal repetition are now but metaphysical abstractions to religion and physical guesswork to science.
Within the secret of Light is the answer to all of these heretofore unanswered questions, and many more, which the ages have not yet solved. This revelation of the nature of Light will be the inheritance of man in this coming New Age of greater comprehension. Its unfoldment will prove the existence of God by methods and standards acceptable to science and religion alike. It will lay a spiritual foundation under the present material one of science.
The two greatest elements in civilization, religion and science, will thus find unity in marriage of the two. Likewise human relationships will become more balanced because of greater knowledge of universal law which lies behind all of the processes which light uses to interweave the patterned forms of this electric wave universe.
There is no department of life which will not be vitally affected by this new knowledge of the nature of Light, from the university to the laboratory, from government to industry, and from nation to nation.
I therefore give it to you with all of its clarity as I myself have become aware of it from behind the scenes of this cosmic cinema of light illusion which is our universe.
Have you researched Einstein's views on this?
Originally posted by Mary Rose
I like fusing science with religion - not organized religion but religious thinking. Otherwise, our picture of the universe is incomplete.
...Einstein seems to have thought there existed a 'true' religion that couldn't conflict with science.
The reservoir is the unmagnetized rare earth material Neodymium.
The dam itself is the dielectric material Teflon.
The electrons will accelerate from the rare earth material in an organized fashion
through the teflon like water shooting out of a pressurized and controlled hole
in a dam.
The teflon can only hold back so much electron pressure just like a dam can only
hold so much water pressure.
The electrons will pass through the teflon into the ferrite permanent magnet
layer where they are accelerated outward in a ring. The magnets act as the diode
and one way valve.
Here's a quote from that page:
Originally posted by Mary Rose
One of the links is to a page about Dr. Pallathadka Keshava Bhat, who has a theory which may help explain the discrepancy you are pointing out.
...the planet Earth never maintains a heliocentric orbit at all. Similar situation is observed with all the planets in the solar system. This statement is totally contradicting the existing views of Copernicus, Tycho Brahe, Kepler, Galileo, Newton and others including the modern astronomers that all the planets in the solar system follow heliocentric orbit.
I can vouch for that, I used to run a lab that did that kind of testing to failure. Electromagnetic fields can pass right through it, but electrons can't, not in any substantial quantity anyway.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Teflon is a pretty good insulator, suitable for high voltage fittings. How do electrons "pass" through teflon? The only way it's possible is the electric breakdown of that material. I've seen it happen in the lab. The result is somewhat like blue cheese, with teflon riddled with grey holes like made by worms. The part needs to be discarded, of course.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Let's marvel again at this piece of nonsense from Searl:
I've never seen that many names and institutions on a single paper before.
In conclusion, we study the invariant mass distribution of jet pairs produced in association with a W boson. The best t to the observed dijet mass distribution using known components, and modeling the dominant W+jets background using Alpgen+Pythia Monte Carlo, shows a statistically significant disagreement. One possible way to interpret this disagreement is as an excess in the 120- 160 GeV/c2 mass range. If we model the excess as a Gaussian component with a width compatible with the dijet invariant mass resolution, and perform a (Chi-squared) test for the presence of this additional component, we obtain a p-value of 7:6 x 10^-4, corresponding to a significance of 3.2 standard deviations, after accounting for all statistical and systematic uncertainties.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Let's marvel again at this piece of nonsense from Searl:
- You are referencing conventional machines where they heat up and experience resistance.
- You're referring to solo particles.
- Searl technology uses implosion or magnetics rather than explosion.
Using the word "nonsense" to describe Searl's technology is a typical mainstream/establishment response. This is an indication of closing off alternative science and technology.
Originally posted by Arbitrageur
reply to post by Americanist
I think this is the paper:
Invariant Mass Distribution of Jet Pairs Produced in Association with a W boson in ppbar Collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV
Maybe buddhasystem can comment on the significance because I don't work with this stuff like he does.
I've never seen that many names and institutions on a single paper before.
As I complained in an earlier post, some of the material in the video is contradictory like Fernando claiming it's EM affecting the rollers and Searl claiming it's gravity.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Also, in many places Searl is talking about neodymium magnets. In the excerpt, there is un-magnetized neodymium. Which one is true?
"The iron element in the SEG "plate" (the big ring) is magnetized with a combined DC and AC magnetizing sequence which causes many poles to form all over the surface of the iron, in a wave like pattern corresponding to the AC frequency used. The iron element is then combined with the others (which are NOT involved in the magnetizing process) in a process called sintering - pushing them together under pressure. The same is done for the smaller magnets, or "rollers", except that each roller consists of eight stacked segments held together by the magnetic field.
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Mary, implosion of what? Or, explosion of what?
Originally posted by buddhasystem
Further, where did I refer to solo particle?
Originally posted by buddhasystem
This is an indication of a functional mind, Mary . . .
As my signature says, and as I try to follow, it's good to have an open mind, but not so open your brain falls out.
Originally posted by Mary Rose
No, it's an indication of a closed mind.
Originally posted by beebs
I will not be convinced until you, or I, falsify Searl's claims experimentally with a replication of the SEG.