It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Resurrectio
They had already released what they felt was sufficient evidence..
But.. with the birth of "birthers" he now feels it is necessary to release more info.
He is going to look for Obama's approval, but is prepared to stop the madness on his own if he has to.
Wonder what all the birthers will have to cry about once they see his birth certificate?
Will they find a new cause? Or will they call it a fake.. One thing is for sure.. THEY WILL NOT BE SATISFIED!
I can hear it now.. "Why did it take so long" Simple answer - They released what they felt was sufficient evidence.. Now they are being faced with a mob of ignorant people that are demanding more.
As a Govt. official, they must draw the line on providing evidence to everyone that asks. Imagine if they fulfilled every request for every thing that the public wants... They would have to employ 5 to 10 new employees in every state to handle this work load.
Then, at what point do you draw the line? Do you bow to every request? Every doubt? Every conspiracy nut, with nothing better to do?
I always thought, why not release it? But again, they felt they covered all bases with the first document release.
And from the sounds of it, they have to make policy changes that would allow Hawaii to release additional evidence that Obama was born in Honolulu on Aug. 4, 1961.
So now, our Govt. is having to make policy changes to appease the nuts! What a great state of affairs we are in.
www.examiner.com
(visit the link for the full news article)edit on 12/28/2010 by Resurrectio because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by Honor93
two (2) of them, both proven false.
When were they proven false?
also, his dual citizenship with the UK from birth is both disturbing and disqualifying to say the least.
Again, just making things up.
Originally posted by Resurrectio
reply to post by filosophia
They released the certificate of live birth.. Which, in most cases is sufficient.. But not to birthers.. They want the swaddle blanket from the birthing room thrown in too!
"Also being a dual citizen doesn't exclude you from holding the office of president"
Originally posted by Sinnthia
reply to post by Honor93
Before I even pretend to humor your factless post, let me ask you something seriously.
How do you rectify the dichotomy of beliefs it takes to post what you post? You say that you cannot believe the CLAIM that Obama is American because of insufficient evidence.
Please tell me why I should then value any claim made by anyone (I am looking at you) when they have NO EVIDENCE?
When you can explain that to me, maybe we can get on an even keel.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by JohhnyBGood
any links for this?? "Congress has admitted in a confidential memo - that no-one ever vetted his elligability." ... i would be very curious to see this admission in writing
MEMORANDUM
Subject: Qualifications for the Office of President of the United States and Legal Challenges to the Eligibility of a Candidate.
From: Jack Maskell
Legislative Attorney
American Law Division
This memorandum was prepared to enable distribution to more than one
Congressional office.
..........................
Concerning the production or release of an original birth certificate, it should be noted that there is no federal law, regulation, rule, guideline, or requirement that a candidate for federal office produce his or her original birth certificate, or a certified copy of the record of live birth, to any official of the United States Government; nor is there a requirement for federal candidates to publicly release such personal record or documentation. Furthermore, there is no specific federal agency or office that “vets” candidates for federal office as to qualifications or eligibility prior to election.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
reply to post by Honor93
Before I even pretend to humor your factless post, let me ask you something seriously.
How do you rectify the dichotomy of beliefs it takes to post what you post? You say that you cannot believe the CLAIM that Obama is American because of insufficient evidence.
Please tell me why I should then value any claim made by anyone (I am looking at you) when they have NO EVIDENCE?
When you can explain that to me, maybe we can get on an even keel.