It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Honor93
two (2) of them, both proven false.
also, his dual citizenship with the UK from birth is both disturbing and disqualifying to say the least.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
reply to post by JohhnyBGood
Well when your source is a man who is making money off the birthers continuing to believe in the birther conspiracy and his bottom line relies on convincing you he is right, how can it not be biased or tainted?
I swear the birther threads now look like the ones from a year ago but with a limp and a slur.
Originally posted by Sinnthia
Originally posted by TexasChem
Actually my source is from the Hawaii state.gov website sugar britches!
Too bad you did not understand what you were reading.
The state of Hawaii actually changed the wording from Certification of birth to Certificate of birth per my own investigation into this subject over the course of a year.After reviewing this matter please come back and tell me who is making what up my dear.
hawaii.gov...
I took the liberty of posting the sentences you should look for on this government website for you darlin.
Who is Eligible to Apply for an Amended Certificate of Birth?
A person born in a foreign country who has been legally adopted in the State of Hawaii.
How to Apply for an Amended Certificate of Birth
For a person born in a foreign country who has been legally adopted in the State of Hawaii:
An amended birth certificate will be prepared upon receipt of a certified copy of the adoption decree or the certificate of adoption, and payment of fees.
LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
How did you miss the key word "Ammended?" You do know that the type of birth certificate you are pointing to here will also state the actual place of birth? This has nothing to do with your short form/long form/certificate/certification argument. Yes, people from foreign places can get an ammended BC in Hawaii. Know what it says under place of birth? NOT HAWAII!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Nowhere on that page does it show how anyone can get a Hawaiian birth certificate CERTIFYING a HAWAIIAN BIRTH without actually proving they were born in Hawaii.
Please read your source next time. It will prevent this kind of foolishness.
Funny though. Thanks for that.
Originally posted by rlrsar
His place of birth is not as important as the FACT that his father was a Brittish subject. Obama was a dual citizen at birth because of his fathers nationality. Our Constitution requires that only natural born citizens are eligible for the office of President. That requirement has been upheld by several supreme court decisions going back over 100 years. As a dual citizen he was a native born citizen at birth, He was then adopted by an indonesian and became an Indonesian citizen, and was no longer a citizen of the USA at all. He could have become a Naturalized citizen when he returned to the USA, but there is no record of that.
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
Exactly how would you interpret this?
and any time a child was registered for a public school, the child’s name and citizenship status were verified through the Indonesian Government. See Constitution of Republic of Indonesia (Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945), Chapter 13, Law No. 62 of 1958 (all citizens of Indonesia have a right to education) – ** it does not say all children are entitled to an education, it specifies “all citizens” **.
Originally posted by rlrsar
reply to post by Resurrectio
If both of your parents were from the moon and you were born in Maine you would be a US citizen, a Native born citizen but NOT a Natrual born citizen. Natural born status is reserved for people born on US soil to parents (plural) that are citizens of the USA. The only place that this status matters is for the ofice of President. Our founding fathers did not want anyone with any loyalty to any other country (or the moon in your case) to be the head of this country.
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
reply to post by Resurrectio
You stated that it was preposterous to imagine that no-one in govt checked out his eligibility.
I point you to a confirmed (confidential) congressional memo, confirming that his eligibility was never checked or verified.
You ignore this - and still maintain he was vetted - I would say it is you who are looking like the crazy wacky denying conspiracy believer now!
Who is a natural-born citizen? Who, in other words, is a citizen at birth, such that that person can be a President someday?
The 14th Amendment defines citizenship this way: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside." But even this does not get specific enough. As usual, the Constitution provides the framework for the law, but it is the law that fills in the gaps. The Constitution authorizes the Congress to do create clarifying legislation in Section 5 of the 14th Amendment; the Constitution, in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4, also allows the Congress to create law regarding naturalization, which includes citizenship.
Currently, Title 8 of the U.S. Code fills in the gaps left by the Constitution. Section 1401 defines the following as people who are "citizens of the United States at birth:"
Anyone born inside the United States *
Any Indian or Eskimo born in the United States, provided being a citizen of the U.S. does not impair the person's status as a citizen of the tribe
Any one born outside the United States, both of whose parents are citizens of the U.S., as long as one parent has lived in the U.S.
Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year and the other parent is a U.S. national
Any one born in a U.S. possession, if one parent is a citizen and lived in the U.S. for at least one year
Any one found in the U.S. under the age of five, whose parentage cannot be determined, as long as proof of non-citizenship is not provided by age 21
Any one born outside the United States, if one parent is an alien and as long as the other parent is a citizen of the U.S. who lived in the U.S. for at least five years (with military and diplomatic service included in this time)
A final, historical condition: a person born before 5/24/1934 of an alien father and a U.S. citizen mother who has lived in the U.S.
For a natural-born citizen, losing your citizenship is actually quite difficult. The law prohibits the taking of your citizenship against your will, but there are certain actions a citizen can take which are assumed to be a free-will decision that constitutes a voluntary renunciation of the citizenship.
Moving to another country for an extended period of time does not constitute an act that presumes renunciation. Neither does taking a routine-level job with a foreign government. This stand is quite different from U.S. policy of the past, where even being naturalized in another nation could be seen as renunciation. The sections of the law that pertained to losing ones nationality for many of these cases was found at 8 USC 1482 and related sections.
The U.S. Code does, however, see some acts as creating the possibility of a loss of nationality. When you lose your U.S. nationality, you are no longer under the protection or jurisdiction of the United States. When the United States considers you to no longer be of U.S. nationality, it in effect considers you to no longer be a citizen. Note that these are things you can do that may force you to lose your citizenship. The law also says that these acts must be voluntary and with the intent of losing U.S. citizenship. The ways to lose citizenship are detailed in 8 USC 1481:
Becoming naturalized in another country
Swearing an oath of allegiance to another country
Serving in the armed forces of a nation at war with the U.S., or if you are an officer in that force
Working for the government of another nation if doing so requires that you become naturalized or that you swear an oath of allegiance
Formally renouncing citizenship at a U.S. consular office
Formally renouncing citizenship to the U.S. Attorney General
By being convicted of committing treason
Originally posted by Everwatcher33
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
reply to post by Resurrectio
You stated that it was preposterous to imagine that no-one in govt checked out his eligibility.
I point you to a confirmed (confidential) congressional memo, confirming that his eligibility was never checked or verified.
You ignore this - and still maintain he was vetted - I would say it is you who are looking like the crazy wacky denying conspiracy believer now!
No one in government but when you are running a smear campaign as bad as that election was you don't think someone would be looking into that? I don't know about you but if I'm losing and I can my opponent isn't even eligible to run I'm going for it. Simple politics.
WND Exclusive BORN IN THE USA? Eye-popper: Is Nancy Pelosi in on eligibility cover-up? Online images for certification of nomination raise questions Posted: September 11, 2009 8:01 pm Eastern By Bob Unruh © 2010 WorldNetDaily A commentator at Canada Free Press says he has obtained copies of two documents apparently prepared by Democrats to certify Barack Obama as their nominee for president in 2008 that suggest House Speaker Nancy Pelosi knew there was an unresolved issue with his eligibility under the U.S. Constitution. Writer JB Williams describes himself as a "no nonsense commentator on American politics, American history, and American philosophy." And he say's he's gotten possession of copies of the documents in question. The first includes a verification that Obama and Joe Biden, then-candidate for vice president, "are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution." One image of the certification for Barack Obama's nomination, including the affirmation Obama and Joe Biden "are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution" The second form obtained by Williams appears identical, down to a typographical error in "through." But in this one, the verification of eligibility under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution is gone. Another image of a certification, on which the certification of eligibility has been removed "Now this is the stuff real conspiracies are made of!" Williams, who also maintains his own website, wrote. "Please allow me to connect the dots here…" (Story continues below) "The DNC drafted, signed and notarized TWO slightly different versions of their Official Certification of Nomination documents, not one," he wrote. "One of those documents had complete legal language, and one of them was missing the text concerning the constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama. Read more: Eye-popper: Is Nancy Pelosi in on eligibility cover-up? www.wnd.com...
Originally posted by JohhnyBGood
Fact is you cannot point to anyone who knows for sure where he was born - crucially Pelosi who signed the certificates of nomination for the DNC - left out the crucial elligibility clause.
A certified copy is printed on special safety paper and contains a raised, embossed seal.
...
An authenticated (exemplified or containing an apostille) record is typically required by a foreign government for adoption, work visas, or establishing residency. An authenticated document is NOT needed for foreign travel. You must provide the name of the FOREIGN country where the document will be used. An apostille CANNOT be applied to a document that will be used in the United States.
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
reply to post by HappilyEverAfter
Could you possibly provide a source LINK when you source outside material, so the rest of us could look into it? Thanks.
What's the difference between an authenticated and certified copy?edit on 12/29/2010 by Benevolent Heretic because: (no reason given)