It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IAMIAM
Had Christ resisted being put to death, he would have acted contrary to his own teachings of love and forgiveness.
This is why Constantine had to convert.
This is good my friend. How would you stop it without harming anyone else?
When you are willing to put your life on the line for all your fellow man, then you will know Christs message.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Jesus neither loved nor forgave those in the temple.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Constantine converted following the Battle of Milvian Bridge following a rather arbitrary "vision".
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Which message? He had much to say. He claimed he was here to fulfill the law. This still goes back to my original point. Only a major sacrifice - in this case human sacrifice - was good enough for Jesus' Lord. I do not believe in human sacrifice, nor worshipping bloodthirsty gods. If this was the purpose of Jesus' death I disagree with it in every way.
Originally posted by IAMIAM
This is a legend my friend, nothing more. Does Constantines actions reflect those of a convert?
The message reflected in his life and death, not just the words. When you are dead and gone, others will be free to attribute many things to be said by you as well. What will others have to discern what is truth and what is false about what YOU said in this life?
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Which message? He had much to say. He claimed he was here to fulfill the law. This still goes back to my original point. Only a major sacrifice - in this case human sacrifice - was good enough for Jesus' Lord. I do not believe in human sacrifice, nor worshipping bloodthirsty gods. If this was the purpose of Jesus' death I disagree with it in every way.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Though Jesus was radically merciful about some things (and said some abhorrent things as well), why does his self-sacrifice to a bloodthirsty god give them any more merit? The "golden rule" existed long before Jesus. Human sacrifice does not particularly elevate his message, save those who are impressed by martyrdom.
Originally posted by IAMIAM
Jesus did not sacrifice himself to a blood thirsty God my friend. I am uncertain where you get this idea from. Jesus saw God as love and forgiveness, which is why he taught love and forgiveness.
We seem to have a misunderstanding. What do you think was the lessons Jesus taught and how do you derive from those teachings that he followed a blood thirsty God?
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
You see, but saw nothing. You hear, but heard nothing. You read, but comprehended nothing.
Still your heart for once and listen. That's where the real temple of our Creator resides in, not artificial man made pride contructs.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
The whole "Jesus died for our sins" thing.
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
The "old testament" makes it very certain that the god character was bloodthirsty. Jesus taught many things. Some uncommonly merciful for the time, some things that were simply bad advice.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Originally posted by traditionaldrummer
Which message? He had much to say. He claimed he was here to fulfill the law. This still goes back to my original point. Only a major sacrifice - in this case human sacrifice - was good enough for Jesus' Lord. I do not believe in human sacrifice, nor worshipping bloodthirsty gods. If this was the purpose of Jesus' death I disagree with it in every way.
You see, but saw nothing. You hear, but heard nothing. You read, but comprehended nothing.
Still your heart for once and listen. That's where the real temple of our Creator resides in, not artificial man made pride contructs.
The Messiah HAD NEVER asked to be sacrificed. He, in his wisdom, knew that was the only end for his attempt to save humanity, jews and gentiles, by your idols -mortal pharasees. It was they that demanded human sacrifice, even as the roman governer baulked at such requests for the Messiah's supposed 'crime' for speaking out.
Still your heart and listen instead, I plead..
Matthew 13
10 The disciples came to him and asked, “Why do you speak to the people in parables?”
11 He replied, “Because the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of heaven has been given to you, but not to them. 12 Whoever has will be given more, and they will have an abundance. Whoever does not have, even what they have will be taken from them. 13 This is why I speak to them in parables:
“Though seeing, they do not see;
though hearing, they do not hear or understand.
14 In them is fulfilled the prophecy of Isaiah:
“‘You will be ever hearing but never understanding;
you will be ever seeing but never perceiving.
15 For this people’s heart has become calloused;
they hardly hear with their ears,
and they have closed their eyes.
Otherwise they might see with their eyes,
hear with their ears,
understand with their hearts
and turn, and I would heal them.
16 But blessed are your eyes because they see, and your ears because they hear. 17 For truly I tell you, many prophets and righteous people longed to see what you see but did not see it, and to hear what you hear but did not hear it.
Originally posted by Unity_99
One day there will be a galactic ascension, the new creation.
.
And as do I. How do we know Christ is what the Bible says he is
I start with knowing full well there must be a God
.
.If there is a God he must be powerful enough to to get a communicado to us
Finding that communication shouldn't be hard. It would stand out from anything known to man. Well the Bible fits that bill one hundred times over.
Gods word can't have a bunch of crap in it .
Originally posted by dontreally
Whats there for me to say?
You already completely disagree with the fact that Judaism is completely incompatible with Jesus' core teachings.
Originally posted by dontreally
And as for the 613 laws and the oral tradition. There was no 'forgetting'. An oral tradition simply means that the inner, esoteric knowledge was passed down from teacher to student, and not put into writing.
Originally posted by dontreally
The 613 laws themselves are based on quite a deep concept. The basic 10 commandments are laws between G-d and man (the first 5) and man and man (the last 5). The rest of the 603 laws in Judaism have to do with obedience and submission to the divine will. The divine willl in kabbalistic context is Keter - the highest sphere. Keter means 'crown' and refers to the crown of the soul. In human faculties, Keter represents the power of will which transcends conscious understanding. It is superconscious, and as as such, the power to will is considered a particularly godly function. When man negates his own will for the divine will he unites the most internal aspect that man can know - G-ds will, and unites it with this physical world, malkuth which is seen as being removed from G-d. Because the universe is made up of two properties, the rational and irrational, the only way for man to overcome the limitations of the natural order (the name Elohim) is for him to overcome his own nature, and by doing so, draws down the name YHWH into this world, thus merging the infinite with the fnite, the limited with the miraculous. It all depends on human action.
Originally posted by dontreally
So the intrinsic idea behind the 613 commandments is superrational. They really only apply to Jews, whereas non Jews have the basic 7 laws of noach to perform (which are more or less, the 10 commandments) all of which have a basic rational explanation.
Originally posted by dontreally
This has been the point of Judaism from the very beginning and anyone who thinks differently probably has never studied the bible, and certainly hasnt done so in its original language (Hebrew).
Originally posted by dontreally
There is thus only one logical explanation for the phenomena of christianity. The earlier enemies of the Jews - the greco-romans, hatched a sagacious plot to both trivialize and reinvent the Jewish religion, which they knew threatened their own socio-political goals.
Originally posted by dontreally
People who dont understand this are generally people who have never read any rabbinic work and so have no clue what the attitude of the Jews are, and have obviously never read any of the greek classics - platos republic, hesiods theogany, homers illiad, etc. Because these works lay down in perfect crystal clear language how utterly opposed Greek thought is to Jewish thought. They are on two different sides of the spiritual spectrum. Their values are different, their lifestyles are different. The greeks with an insatiable imperialistic lust for power and more and more and progress ad infinitum. thats why it doesnt care that christianity is built on specious ground. It mutilated one religion (Judaism) and combined it with incompatiable aspects. And today its removing those Jewish garbs (those aspects) to return to its original pagan/dionysian foundations, which in anycase are unstable.