It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by forklift
Op ignoring all the other genocides that took place in Africa and around the word since WW2?
Originally posted by babloyi
Do you deny that 90% of what you wrote in your OP was false?
Originally posted by babloyi
[ Did you respond to I AM LEGIONS post on page 11? Because I am going through the whole thread slowly now, but I have yet to see it.
Originally posted by archasama
Let's talk about present shall we?
Israel now is a Nazi state.
First of all the Protocols is not a 'Nazi-ideoligy'
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by forklift
Op ignoring all the other genocides that took place in Africa and around the word since WW2?
Which of these Genocides or any other were done by Jews?
Is it a Hoax that the Muslim Brotherhood is responsible for the largest Genocide since WWII? Not hardly.
Originally posted by AbuMusaab
Just for the record, insulting the Prophet, sallallahu alayhi wa salaam, is punishable by death, and there is enough evidence in the hadith for it. If there are enough reliable witnesses, then the sentence should be carried out.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
First of all the Protocols is not a 'Nazi-ideoligy'
Hitler used it. Goebbels used it. Himmler used it. It was invented by Russians but it was most used by the Nazis. Today it is most used by Islamofascists to justify their agenda to exterminate all Jews.
Originally posted by babloyi
All you proved was that Amin Al-Husayni visited Nazi Germany, and met with Hitler...and that was already common knowledge. While he was generally patted on the back by them (who would turn away an ally during a war?), it is quite obvious they didn't consider him anything but a naive idiot who was helping by being a thorn in the side of the enemy.
Originally posted by forklift
It doesn't matter who used it, the point i am trying to make is IT IS NOT A 'Nazi Ideoligy' as you're trying to make it out to make your thread look more legit by linking it with Hamas and Co and indirectly blaming all the muslims planning to kill all the jews because they don't recognise the illegal establishment of israel in Middle East.
Originally posted by name pending
Almost 90% of what Skyfloating has said in his opening thread post is made of conjuncture and false information.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
All the filings for the removal of this thread are pathetic. Facist-mindset at its finest.
What about moving the hundreds of threads on the "Protocols of the Wise Elders of Zion" to the Hoax Forum?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
So Hamas and Hezbollah do not share the same Ideology as Hitler which they acquired through suicide-bomber cults such as the Muslim Brotherhood?
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by forklift
It doesn't matter who used it, the point i am trying to make is IT IS NOT A 'Nazi Ideoligy' as you're trying to make it out to make your thread look more legit by linking it with Hamas and Co and indirectly blaming all the muslims planning to kill all the jews because they don't recognise the illegal establishment of israel in Middle East.
The idea that Jews are the ruling parasites of the world is most certainly Nazi-Ideology.
By their own Admission. Similar philosophies are Hamas, by their own ADMISSION..
You are denying stuff the people themselves admit.
And again: This has nothing to do with muslims.. I know muslims. I can tell the difference between muslims and Islamofascists.
Most muslims are like us...they just want to lead a normal and peaceful life.
The Islamofascists you keep embracing, are the enemy of muslims
Originally posted by name pending
After seeing your response I have just now reported your thread to be moved to hoax section. Pathetic is presenting incorrect information and presenting them as facts.
Originally posted by name pending
No. You have already been disproven on these on Page 11.
Originally posted by Skyfloating
Originally posted by name pending
No. You have already been disproven on these on Page 11.
Try telling Wikipedia that all their information on the subject is false and see if they remove it.
One or two inaccuracies does not mean the general OP is "disproven".edit on 25-11-2010 by Skyfloating because: (no reason given)