Mysterious Missile Launch Over California - 11/8/2010

Originally posted by backinblack

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by backinblack

 

DIFFERENT ALTITUDES!!!

Read it.

Ohh come on now WW..Do I really need to search back in the thread to where you and others stated clearly that flight 808 was in perfect contrail space???
It's really a little sad..I thought you'd be man enouth to admit when you're wrong..

You are obviously not grasping this.

They were both in altitudes where they COULD produce contrails...doesn't mean they both HAVE to produce contrails.

They were also at DIFFERENT altitudes (both altitudes where they COULD produce a contrail), so it is possible that one would produce a contrail and one wouldn't.


It's not really that hard to understand.

reply to post by backinblack


I'm interested to hear what you think of this event?

It seems like you really really want to believe this was a missile...so please tell me what evidence you have that it was a missile.

reply to post by OutKast Searcher

You are obviously not grasping this

You are obviously not grasping the funny side of this...
Two days ago the same people were argueing why this flight 808 DID produce a contrail...

Today the same people are argueing why this same flight 808 DIDN'T produce a contrail...

Thats priceless, I almost peed myself..

reply to post by backinblack

Thats not what you thought or said when you were convinced it was flight 808..
You all checked the flightpath, altitudes, weather, the whole lot and said yep, perfect for contrails...
It would be nice to hear an, I was wrong.....

That was before we had an exact time for the sighting. For all we know, US808 did create a contrail 30 minutes earlier.

reply to post by backinblack


Who said US808 didn't produce a contrail?

reply to post by Phage

Thats true, no one was really looking..
But come on, your human..I bet you had just a little chuckle right?

But seriously, the only part I can't get my head around is that pic showing the trail 160 miles away..
I have to do a country trip on thursday basically right under the Syd Melb flightpath..
There's nearly always some contrails and it has been cold..I'll be there early morning..
I'll look out for them and try to get some perspective of distance...

reply to post by backinblack

I don't really find it amusing when people distort what I say.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by backinblack

 

I don't really find it amusing when people distort what I say.

What did I distort?

reply to post by backinblack

Short memory?

Today the same people are argueing why this same flight 808 DIDN'T produce a contrail... Thats priceless, I almost peed myself..

i]reply to post by Phage

Since you seem to have missed it the first time:

Any one or more of a number of reasons.

Different aircraft/engines. Different contrail characteristics.

Different altitudes. US808 was 2,000 feet lower than UPS902. Different atmospheric conditions.

US808 was over Catalina 30 minutes before UPS902.
a)With 75 knot winds at altitude, time for the contrail to drift more than 30 miles.
b)Time for a contrail to dissipate or spread.

My memory is fine Phage..Yours?

Different altitudes. US808 was 2,000 feet lower than UPS902. Different atmospheric conditions

reply to post by backinblack


What exactly are you trying to say?

Like I said before, you are obviously not grasping what Phage or WW are saying...so you are asking silly questions that don't make sense.


Are you going to answer my previous question as to what you believe this event was? And what evidence do you have to back up that opinion?

reply to post by backinblack

Where did I say that US808 did not create a contrail?

reply to post by Phage


What was this meant to be saying

Any one or more of a number of reasons.

Different aircraft/engines. Different contrail characteristics.

Different altitudes. US808 was 2,000 feet lower than UPS902. Different atmospheric conditions.

reply to post by OutKast Searcher

.doesn't mean they both HAVE to produce contrails.

Just want to add...

Doesn't mean EITHER one produced contrails.

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by backinblack

 

What exactly are you trying to say?

Like I said before, you are obviously not grasping what Phage or WW are saying...so you are asking silly questions that don't make sense.


Are you going to answer my previous question as to what you believe this event was? And what evidence do you have to back up that opinion?

I've posted what I think many time..Go read them..

reply to post by backinblack

I've posted what I think many time..Go read them..

LOL...so search 170+ pages for your opinion?

What a dumb suggestion...is it that hard for you to type them out here?

Look...I'll type mine again....I believe it is a jet contrail...see...that wasn't too hard.


So I'll ask again. What are your thoughts on this event and what evidence do you have to back that up.

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by OutKast Searcher

 

.doesn't mean they both HAVE to produce contrails.

Just want to add...

Doesn't mean EITHER one produced contrails.

I'll ask you the same question...what are your thoughts on this event and what is your evidence?

reply to post by OutKast Searcher
I think it was an odd-looking trail that was captured on the video. It does look a lot like a Trident missile launch trail, which I have witnessed personally. However that is just an opinion.

I have seen NO evidence that this event was a missile OR an airplane.

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by OutKast Searcher

 

I think it was an odd-looking trail that was captured on the video. It does look a lot like a Trident missile launch trail, which I have witnessed personally. However that is just an opinion.

I have seen NO evidence that this event was a missile OR an airplane.

Looking at your post history in this thread...it seems like you are very much saying it was a missile. And that you are very much saying that the "planers" are just delusional.

www.abovetopsecret.com...&mem=butcherguy


Would you care to explain why you seem to accept one theory over the other if you claim that neither have any evidence?

reply to post by OutKast Searcher
Would you care to tell me if you are referring to my reply to the Estes rocket quote???
Please paste the quote you are specifically referring to so that I might respond to it.

I have said that the trail looks like that which an SLBM would leave in the sky. That is just my opinion. At the beginning of this thread, I thought it looked so much like a missile that I believed it was a missile launch that was taped. After seeing some still shots of aircraft contrails, I can see where it could be a contrail, but again, there's no proof either way.

While you are at it show me proof that it was a missile OR proof that a plane left a contrail, instead of calling my stand on this in question. My stand is that a lot of people have presented a lot of nothing. Zero real evidence either way.