Some Say Moon Photos Show Signs of Alien Life (ATS video used in article! 11/1/10)

It seems as if there is an "All Seeing Eye" up there on the moon with a face along with it like a message to the people below down on earth telling us that we are being watched.
Did some superior race carve the surface of the moon to make it that way, so that we can look upon the moon and stay charmed and hypnotized to the truths we should never be known of?

If you go to the Gray Area Forum, at the top of the list you will see a link to the John Lear stuff. All this has been discussed to the point of ridiculous. You will love those threads if your interested.

As others have pointed out, beware the interpolated crap and go to the originals. Nobody is hiding them and nobody can get any you can't get yourself.

Mostly Basalt features being misinterpreted and altered through incompetent handling or out and out fraud.

If you find a site that is altering the photo's in that manner, don't waste your time with it. Go to the original and if they won't give you the name of the original, they likely have never bothered with it themselves and they are posting other peoples stuff. The names make them easy to locate through the various libraries they exist in.

You will find a library, hosted by ATS from Lears stuff on a very long thread on this topic. If nothing else you will enjoy the Soul Catcher.

reply to post by alphaMegas


What a shameful waste of ATS bandwidth!

reply to post by The Shrike


hello mr. shrike...
got something even lesser or better than the waste i've got?
please share...

must be very interesting,,, the ones you have....

reply to post by Blaine91555


Thank you for that info.

I didn't know that info existed.

See, these threads do a good thing. Brings us noobs up to date.

Thanks again.

Originally posted by Little_Kona

I could be wrong,,but why does Nasa avoid the annomilies so much??,,,surely we could send rovers/probes there rather quickly,,,aim the hubble at it for a few days and explore our backyard a tad more than aiming it at galaxy z127 a billion light years away???

I have often felt the same way. In answer to your question, Little Kona, I would recommend reading Dark Mission by Hoagland and Bara. -TAT

Originally posted by Bigfoot73
MikeSingh may not be on ATS any more but he is on a couple of other forums I'm on, not Hoagland's or Icke's I hasten to point out. Some of his finds are a bit hit and miss, but he has definitely found some anomalies anybody would find very difficult to debunk.

As an experienced lunar anomaly skeptic and successful debunker, since the early 1980s, I look forward to comments such as yours. For the next step is to ask you to back your words. You can do this simply by giving unimpeachable sources although I'd rather you post the photo, any photo, that shows a single unexplainable anomaly.

Unfortunately his 'smoking gun' image in this video isn't one of them :- I've seen other renderings of it and there is actually nothing there, it's just shadows. However the most obviously debunk-prone image of the lot, that thing which looks like the blade off some huge digging machine, is for real. It was in the Clementine Lunar Image Browser 1.5, the NASA compilation of the Clementine orbiter's images taken in 1994. It was at Lat, -35. Long. 208, and was there for all to see until early this year when NASA 'retired' CLIB without explanation. Think you can all guess why. Hard to believe? Damn right it is , but there it was, and it's not the only obvious artefact NASA have inadvertently published images of.

You cannot say that anything seen in lunar photos is for real for the photo resolutions do not allow that kind of confidence. And for you to say that we can all guess why the Navy retired the CLIB without explanation, and I'm sure one can find an explanation if one searches thoroughly, smacks of conspiracy without foundation. NASA has never published an "obvious artefact" 'cause then we would all have seen it and commented on it/them.

He's also found some sort of buildings complex on top of a ridge on Mars and recently a silver UFO looking thing of about 30 feet long (HiRise resolution really is that good). The NASA browser gives pixel references and I tracked both of them down, as did other people, and they really are there in very good detail and colour - not shadows or tricks of the light.

Please include a source so that we can check it out and make up our own minds.

So how did they all get there? My personal pennysworth is that there were previous advanced civilizations on Earth, and global cataclysms have obliterated both them and all evidence of them - except for their activity on the Moon.As for Mars, well that's anybody's guess, but maybe that was us too.

You have nothing but uneducated opinion.

Originally posted by alphaMegas
reply to post by The Shrike

 

hello mr. shrike...
got something even lesser or better than the waste i've got?
please share...

must be very interesting,,, the ones you have....

If you do a search you will find that I've contributed plenty. Not insulting you, mind you, just criticizing.

The pictures in the video seemed too pixelated/low res, to identify any structures or features made by intelligent life. Also i didn't see anything out of the ordinary even in the suggested patterns.

When discussing life on the moon first think of this:
Why would anyone advanced enough to reach our solar system would settle on the moon that has no protection from the solar wind and temperatures ranging from -280 degrees on the dark side to +260 during day time ?

I have to admit it makes for a good observation outpost for the Earth, but if anyone is up there they are definitely not from our neighborhood

[redacted]

Just not worth it

:shk:

Originally posted by zorgon
[redacted]

Just not worth it

:shk:

ditto
Cool thread btw nice Op

Ocker

Originally posted by ocker

Originally posted by zorgon
[redacted]

Just not worth it

:shk:

ditto
Cool thread btw nice Op

Ocker

add me to that list.

maybe one day...

I don't believe any of it OP.

But a star and flag for an interesting find and a well constructed introduction to the topic.

AOL News eh?

Aren't they part of the Time Warner NWO camp?

-m0r

My apollogies for if this is "off topic".. but i need to put it out there.. if there is a better place to post this, please someone let me know, or copy/paste if possible.. in reguards to moon & mars anomolies, aliens & ufos, underground military/et bases, which indeed (in my opinoin) exists.. does the vast majority public see the proof?.. if the "government" or which ever organization known or not, would disclose all knowledge, would this cause "mass panic". ( i don't think so) its not a national security issue.. its a world wide issue.. lets all take a censous.. involving "how much of a panic you would be in, if you found out aliens, (and the above) were real".. send the results to the "government" (prolly would do no good) and show "them" we as humans are not afraid of the truth, but need to know the truth!!.. maybe,,,,, just maybe someone in there will say its time to 100% disclose!!

What I see is pictures of the moon's surface and arrows pointing at stones. It's just what you wanna see.

Could be wrong. Will probably never know.

I hope there is something, but... I've seen a lot of things or thought I'd seen and when nothing ever changes, you get tired of the fantasy.

No, truth is I'm bitter over the secrecy and not knowing if someone's lying.

I mean what can you do, call the cops? Hey NASA is lying, there's pyramids on the moon, and Obama is an alien. People who study these are deep thinkers (which certainly doesn't mean they're all sane), unlike the majority, and the only ones who take us seriously are in control of what information is released, unfortunately. I think it's possible there is something on the moon. I think India asked NASA to make it public. Thing is, UFO's are not talked of in public because of the misunderstanding of the term, and the careful approach by military to publicize these cases. Of course if there are ruins on the moon, USA might want to keep it to themselves. It would indeed be cool if they started talking about our galaxy cousins' lost civilization ruins in the moon in school classes.

I still read this stuff but won't spend time researching it too much.

As for the astronauts... I think someone of them said something along the lines of "oh the aliens, I said things about them but that was just fantasy, the truth is they're not there." Correct me if I'm wrong. I kind of lost taste on the astronaut matter after that.

I don't want to appear like I'm cruel or a "misinformation agent" breeding lies I'm very very open minded, but sometimes it's nice to be calm for change instead of diving into the conspiracy. I regard myself a bright-minded individual.

reply to post by IAMTAT


ok friend,,,i will,,,

reply to post by The Shrike


thanks for the critizism but what is wanting is validisation. a one line critisism coming from a "sucessful debunker" sounds very unconvincing at all.and what is needed here is a constructive one. i share these images for all to put in for whats its worth...
as for the contributions well , thats what we are here for , right mate? ...

Originally posted by alphaMegas
reply to post by The Shrike

 

thanks for the critizism but what is wanting is validisation. a one line critisism coming from a "sucessful debunker" sounds very unconvincing at all.and what is needed here is a constructive one. i share these images for all to put in for whats its worth...
as for the contributions well , thats what we are here for , right mate? ...

The criticism is the validation. Your OP is a waste of bandwidth because there have been a ton of similar threads all amount to nothing. Look for the thread recently started that criticizes the lack of threads dealing with lunar anomalies now that we have higher resolution Kayuga and other missions photos that clearly show nothing as far as said anomalies/structures. That's why using references such as Mike Singh, Richard Hoagland, et al, are meaningless.

A "successful debunker"?

Originally posted by The Shrike
Your OP is a waste of bandwidth because there have been a ton of similar threads all amount to nothing.

And yet... you feel the need to consume even more bandwidth with your opinions.. which seem to not amount to much either. I wouldn't worry about the band width. The number and variety of threads at ATS draw viewers of all types and that helps pay the bills and salaries

Look for the thread recently started that criticizes the lack of threads dealing with lunar anomalies now that we have higher resolution Kayuga and other missions photos that clearly show nothing as far as said anomalies/structures.

Actually I have found and posted several anomalies in LRO images and Japans HDTV looks like plastic sculpters but the reason there are so few thread about it is because all those who took the time to look and present those threads are no longer here... which I suppose is a victory to the skeptic fringe

So hope you enjoy all the wasted bandwidth used arguing about whether the latest hoax youtube UFO is a balloon, a lantern or CGI

That's why using references such as Mike Singh, Richard Hoagland, et al, are meaningless.

Only to "successful debunkers" But then ATS was not created by or for debunkers. There was a time when it was a cool place to discuss alternative thinking, whether wrong or right.

Well debunk away but I just bet your not the life of the party

Originally posted by Blaine91555
Mostly Basalt features being misinterpreted and altered through incompetent handling or out and out fraud.

Mostly Sedimentary rock



I sure would like to do a little excavating around here