Some Say Moon Photos Show Signs of Alien Life (ATS video used in article! 11/1/10)

reply to post by game over man


One reason it is debunked by astronomers is because of the ridicule factor... People lose funding, grants and jobs for "not playing ball" It has been this way for many decades...

Some of the jaxa hi resolution footages are also very good and show incredible structures.....

Originally posted by alienreality
Some of the jaxa hi resolution footages are also very good and show incredible structures.

Then why not how us these images that show "Incredible structures"?

Why is it no astronomer has ever seen them?

reply to post by alienreality


I, too, would like to see these structures captured by JAXA.

Does anyone have any examples of this?

Go mikey!!!

Ahhh so the attention comes back to the Moon - which means we should all focus on some other part of our galaxy? I suggest Saturn ...

www.ciclops.org...

looky looky:
s3.amazonaws.com... 3D
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/92c6f095d52e.jpg[/atsimg]

reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow


Isn't that how the rings are supposed to look? I remember the formations being described as the result of small moonlets and other natural satellites within Saturn's ring system acting on one another.

reply to post by watchZEITGEISTnow


Funny you should mention Saturn. I just did this thread today about:
Giant Waves Solve Saturn Ring Mystery (great video too)
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Funny, the same picture too. Interesting.

If I may suggest, check out the other thread too.

I think all of the pictures look like natural occurances. Well exept for the last one, that is the only one that is intriguing to me.

reply to post by TorqueyThePig


Do you mean photo #9, of the Drygalski crater?

It looks like a pile of basalt, or some other naturally-occurring part of the Moon's crust. There are just so many easily explained possibilities without leaping "alien structures" speculation.

Especially since that photo was taken from here, on Earth, through a 14-inch telescope. Would be a better examination of the same spot, IF it had a series of other photos to compare, taken at different times of the Lunar "day", so the Sun's angle would be different. Then, the details could be puzzled out in better ways.

That's the problem with so many of these "smoking gun" types of images. One-off examples, tricks of light and shadow, are not definitive "proof" of anything unnatural.

Let me ask you this question, If you wanted to study exotic animals in the amazon jungle for a lengthy period of time,would it be easier to set up shop just outside the jungle or keep making flights from athens georgia back and forth?would it not be easier to be at a relatively closer distance?,we would first have to assume they traveled by light years,not thru folds in space or worm holes or even time because in that case distance would probably not apply(I'm just guessing),as for the structures on the moon I wouldn't doubt if there is,nasa airbrushes photos I'm sure,and did the same creators of the structures on the moon build the pyramids on earth because we damn sure didn't,now I'm a firm believer in that,anyone that honestly believes that we built those massive structures espeacially in that time period is a damn fool.Why were these structures on earth built?will they return?were they supposed to return but did not and why did they not?did they come back and take these civilizations with them?some of you may have researched the claims by former astronaughts that feel they were being watched while on or near the moon and even a claim by one former astronaught that huge spaceships were hovering on the far ridges of craters watching them and also stated that they were told to leave and never come back.If this is true why were they being watched so closely and why were they told to leave?were they too close to something that is not supposed to be seen?Is there in fact an alien moon base on the dark side of the moon?How many secrets are held in the dark,cold,unseen landscapes of our moon?

reply to post by weedwhacker
I was referring to the photo they show at the beginning, and I believe again at the end. I think I worded my response wrong. I was just saying out of all of the photos that was the only one that made me look twice. In no way I'm saying it's alien. I think your explainations are on point!

reply to post by Adept_Zero


yup, i do have some interesting images to show you...

1. a glass like dome 700 meters high.
media.abovetopsecret.com...&action=view&id=127860

2. an interesting cover up job by nasa i presume? and the question that begs the asking why cover this seemingly unimportant part of the moon if it is not that important at all?
media.abovetopsecret.com...&action=view&id=127865

3. though they missed out some...
media.abovetopsecret.com...&action=view&id=127864

4. heres one for the album...
media.abovetopsecret.com...&action=view&id=123930

5. and this babe is huge, sir!!!
media.abovetopsecret.com...&action=view&id=128566

you may look closer at the komarov crater and you will find networks of interesting facilities or whatever you may call it.


media.abovetopsecret.com...&action=view&id=123930

reply to post by alphaMegas


Thanks for posting those. I think you will get some grief from some ATSers but i appreciate them.

The problem is we won't know until we get feet on the ground and we can trust so we can verify this stuff.

I am getting tired of pics and obscure videos. I want the good stuff.

As far as disclosure, if there are things on the moon that are naturally made, the gov't will have to say something before these other countries start landing there in the next decade.

Originally posted by alphaMegas
reply to post by Adept_Zero

 

yup, i do have some interesting images to show you...

1. a glass like dome 700 meters high.
media.abovetopsecret.com...&action=view&id=127860

Where is the glass like dome in the picture? How about referencing the original NASA picture, not the one you photoshopped.... the same goes for all your pictures, reference the original NASA pictures, not your photoshopped ones!

reply to post by alphaMegas


What are we looking at, exactly? Your links all go to your "ATS Media" page, and all the albums.

The "big babe" album? Low resolution photos of a crater? Looks like it.

The "strange ones". One is labeled "NASA cover-up", but it merely shows the rectangular black blocks of missing data that is common in many images from space...scanning artifaccts of missing data, or a mosaic that is incomplete...can't tell which.

Not seeing any "700 meter glass domes", as claimed.

reply to post by dereks


sorry matey, those pix came fromgoogle moon apps, not photo shopped never did any of that, no idea how to do it.reference???you can see the nasa/selene/jaxa labels on the bottom part of the screen.

fact is im trying to validate these pix...as for the quality, well thats how high my resolutions can get with my toshiba lap.

Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by alphaMegas

 

The "strange ones". One is labeled "NASA cover-up", but it merely shows the rectangular black blocks of missing data that is common in many images from space...scanning artifaccts of missing data, or a mosaic that is incomplete...can't tell which.

Not seeing any "700 meter glass domes", as claimed.

edit on 2 November 2010 by weedwhacker because: Format

sorry for the inconvenience...

media.abovetopsecret.com...&action=view&id=127856

it seems to me that those black blocks comes very handy for nasa techies...
i'll try to patch the dome image...

sorry, cant seem to patch that particular image...but its on the "strange ones" album.

i thought i typed "glass like"

I couldn't really make anything out of those pictures. The tracks seemed odd. I have no doubt we are not alone in the universe, to think so is arrogant. Have we seen any images of what is on the dark side of the moon? If there were to be any kind of base I would expect it would be opposite of our view to hide it.

good post and gets one thinking,,,,,,,reguardless,,,

I know images can be cofusing and taken how one veiws it,,,

I could be wrong,,but why does Nasa avoid the annomilies so much??,,,surely we could send rovers/probes there rather quickly,,,aim the hubble at it for a few days and explore our backyard a tad more than aiming it at galaxy z127 a billion light years away???

Im not an expert so maybe i sound silly,,lol

It seems we are avoiding our own solar system a tad to much???

Nasa tends to concentrate on spy sattle lights and cell phone contracts yet its a tax payer funded program,,,

I know they are very important for weather,cell phones and luvvv the results but it seems we are not getting a tad more honesty,,,

The moons are very important in studying life of a planet,,,

And if the photos are bad all I can say is blame NASA,,,not us for posting them,,,,,,

some beautifull clear images and the rest (85%)are blurry and crappy,,,????

sorry if I seem dumb,,,and probly wrong somewhat,,,

To me it not wanting to beleive it just a feeling there was a residue of something on the moon and mars as well,,,

I bet there are some small springs of water on mars as of now and the moon had them as well and water there and not frozen some time back,,,

I get the feeling if water was on a planet for a few million years it wouldnt just be microbes,,we are talking like seaweed or tiny snails and bugs then,,,,,depending on the conditions I guess,,,

I remeber reading a few years back when a scientist wrote if their was even the possibilty of water on mars it would be microbes,,,now some scientist say there was big rivers and seas on mars,,,and evn the possibilty one could grow asparregus???

I think Alge would grow within years,,,

Im not talking ET's or greylings,,,some small snails or mini shell bugs would happen fast,,,

Life has a way of its own on how/when it pops up,,,

sorry to go crazy on my reply....lol

Kona

reply to post by Little_Kona


No, no. Go right ahead. I enjoy looking at and reading your response.

Very thought provoking in it's own right.

Thanks and I have to say, you hit the nail on the head with most of it.

Star for you my friend.

Though I have no accolades for Mr. Hoagland or Mr. Icke. I find mainstream, corporate, and religious scientists just as questionable, if not more so, than those who are on the fringe. Both are opportunists. And in some cases, outright con men.
As for the photos, There will never be definitive proof because all the photos and "evidence" being analyzed are from one source. And they have a vested interest in keeping the shell game going. I'm sure they find all of our arguments and debates quite amusing. Considering none of us can give definitive proof of anything. For or against. We can only quote so and so, and that other guy. And just exactly who is so and so? Or that other guy? They are usually mouthpieces of the establishment. So until the day comes when they decide to tell us what they want us to know, we are relegated to combing over the few scraps they give us to fuel the debate, and perpetuate the division they are so good at creating, and we are so eager to help them accomplish.
Personally, I find the idea of ancient ruins on the moon and mars an interesting one. And have read and studied good arguments for and against. But thats all they are. Arguments. The only people who can decisively end the debate have chosen not to do so. Because they like things as they are. It's up to the citizens of this country, and indeed, the world, to apply the pressure needed to get the truth. However, I don't see that happening. We're all too busy calling each other derogatory names, and sticking out our chests, to come together with one goal in mind. To force the truth from those who are refusing to be forthcoming with it.