It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TheApachekid
reply to post by Immortalgemini527
Simply, astronaut eye witness. If all the astronauts that saw ufo's , also witness the crime of murder and testified
in a court of law, there would be a conviction.This would be considered proof.
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
reply to post by Immortalgemini527
This is my only 1% conclusive evidence.www.youtube.com...
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
reply to post by TheFlash
i my self dont even know,i guess the kind of evidence thast doesnt land u over in the grey area or the hoax area,the same evidence that the mods look for?whatever that is.
Originally posted by TheFlash
Originally posted by Immortalgemini527
reply to post by TheFlash
i my self dont even know,i guess the kind of evidence thast doesnt land u over in the grey area or the hoax area,the same evidence that the mods look for?whatever that is.
Well can you see how it might be hard to provide what you want then even you "don't even know" what it is you are looking for?
I'll tell you this - I have seen people ask for certain knowledge in forums such as this before, when what they were looking for could not possibly be explained/transferred/communicated in 100 lines of text, or 1,000 or even 50,000. An example I might use is someone asking "explain calculus to me" in an email or message forum like this.
The way to get a knowledge of some complex and esoteric subjects is to put in the time and the work to review all (or a substantial portion of) the available information on the subject, assimilate that information, digest it and come to your own INFORMED. EDUCATED conclusion. The more information you are familiar with on the topic, the more valid your opinion on the subject will be, that seems to me to be plain common sense.
Another good example is a court case. A single 10 minute incident might take weeks or months of time and presenting of evidence in a court to explain exactly what happened to a jury. There is no conceivable one minute or 5 minute or 10 minute presentation of data can be used to clearly explain the details of a murder case for example. Likewise there is no single photograph, or video, or book, or speech that I can imagine that might convince or disprove the existence of things such as extraterrestrial visitation on Earth.
If you are truly interested in a subject such as this, and you want to determine the truth behind all the propaganda, kooks, hoaxes and cover-ups then you need to put in the work and study the vast topic for yourself. Sometimes there is no easy way. Like a lot of things in life, you get out of it what you put into it. One of the reasons that (alleged) government propaganda and cover-ups is so effective is that most people do not put in the work to dig up all the facts for themselves. I wonder how many people on this board have thoroughly researched the 9/11 events for example. I am quite sure that for the vast majority of the US population their opinions on the subject are NOT based on a thorough investigation of the available information, but based on what they WANT to believe about the subject.
Originally posted by TheFlash
The way to get a knowledge of some complex and esoteric subjects is to put in the time and the work to review all (or a substantial portion of) the available information on the subject, assimilate that information, digest it and come to your own INFORMED. EDUCATED conclusion. The more information you are familiar with on the topic, the more valid your opinion on the subject will be, that seems to me to be plain common sense.