Democrats to be slaughtered and they deserve it!

reply to post by Southern Guardian

What's the difference between democrats of the 1960's and Today?

They are a lot smarter for one.
Or the progressives that joined them in 1960-1964 were smarter.
They switched from the republicans to the Dems during this time.
I say they were smarter because they found a way to get themselves put in power and to give a lot of the Dems, of the time what they wanted as well.
An enslaved Minority and their vote to boot.
It all started in the 1930's with the "New Deal". Once it was passed, many minorities switched over to the Dem party ( a little known fact: prior to the New Deal almost all Minorities were Republican).
Anyway, the Progressives in the republican party were able to look back almost 30 years and see the "minority shift". They teamed up with the Top Dems and passed the Civil Rights bill in '64 (something the republicans had been trying to pass for years but were always blocked by the dems).
There were still some dems who could not see the big picture but they were small in numbers and could not block the bill.
So today we have a lot of the minorities enslaves by the state (entitlement programs) and their vote goes to the party that keeps them there. Pretty smart of them huh?
Read the following and you will get a clearer picture. Prior to 1960 most Dems were openly racist. Now they still have slaves but blame others for the racism, that's where the progressive "social programs" come in.

In 1789, Congress passes, and George Washington signs into law, a bill stating that no territory could become a state if it allowed slavery.

In 1792, the Democrat Party is formed. They are the party that promotes and seeks the continuance of slavery.

In 1808, Congress abolishes the slave trade in America.

In 1818, the Democrats become the majority in Congress. Using their majority, they begin to undo the 1808 and other anti-slavery decisions.

In 1820, the Democrat Party passes the Missouri Compromise, institutionalizing slavery in half of the territories.

For thirty years, Democrats pass multiple laws promoting and protecting slavery, culminating in 1850 with the Fugitive Slave Law. This law takes away all rights to jury trials, representation, and habeas corpus from any black who is so much as accused of being a slave.

In 1854, Democrats pass the Kansas-Nebraska act, opening up those territories to slavery, thus exceeding even the limits of the Missouri Compromise.

In 1854, the Republican party is formed to end slavery. Six of the nine planks in their fledgling platform statement deal with civil rights issues.

In 1857, the Supreme Court rules in Dred Scott v. Sanford that blacks are considered inferior and thus not covered by the phrase "all men" in the Declaration of Independence; that they are property covered by the 5th Amendment; and that no black—not even a free black—could ever become a citizen of the United States. The Democrats support the decision.

In 1861, Abraham Lincoln is inaugurated, and the anti-slavery Republican Party now controls the Executive Branch. The Democrat Party, in complete control of the South, splits the nation asunder and causes a war in order to maintain slavery. Innumerable horrors and 650,000 deaths are required to free the slaves and restore the union.

In 1865, Republicans pass the 13th Amendment, ending slavery.
100% of Republicans vote for it.
Even among northern Democrats, it receives the support of only 23%.

In spite of the 13th Amendment, Southern Democrats continue to deny blacks their citizenship rights, so...

In 1868, the 14th Amendment was passed, establishing citizenship and equal protection for all in Federal law.
100% of Republicans vote for it.
0% of Democrats vote for it.

In spite of the 14th Amendment, Southern Democrats continue to prevent blacks from enjoying the real fruits of this citizenship, especially the right to vote, so...

In 1869, the 15th Amendment is passed, establishing the right to vote for all people, regardless of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
98% of Republicans vote for it.
3% of Democrats vote for it.

From 1866–1875, the Republican Congress passes 19 civil rights laws. Democrats oppose them all.

In 1875, in order to counter the Democrats' passage of Jim Crow laws, Republicans pass the most sweeping civil rights legislation ever—the Civil Rights Act of 1875. Eight years later, the Supreme Court (mostly Democrat appointees) declares the act unconstitutional.

In 1876, Democrats take control of the House of Representatives. No more meaningful civil rights legislation is passed until 1964.

In 1892, Democrats take control of the White House and the Senate, and they keep control of the House. They immediately begin establishing Jim Crow laws and repealing all civil rights legislation passed by the Republicans. Any laws or amendments they cannot repeal, they skirt with poll taxes and literacy tests.

Beginning after the War, and thenceforward until 1935, ALL blacks elected to Congress are Republicans. In addition to those elected to Federal office, hundreds of blacks—all of them Republicans—are elected to state legislatures in the South.

In 1866, Democrats form the KKK with the express purpose of preventing the election of Republicans in the South. Democrats admit—under oath in Congressional hearings in 1872—that the Klan is a Democrat creation intended to restore Democrat control of the South. The Klan carries out this plan by means of a series of massacres at Republican Party meetings.

In 1901, Republican President Theodore Roosevelt invites Booker T. Washington to the White House. Democrats and the media are outraged.

In the 1920s, Republicans propose anti-lynching legislation. The legislation passes the house but is killed by the Democrat-controlled Senate.

In 1947, Republican businessman Branch Rickey, owner of the Brooklyn Dodgers, hires Jackie Robinson (also a Republican), thus integrating Major League Baseball.

In 1954, Republican Chief Justice Earl Warren (appointed by Republican Dwight Eisenhower) authors the desegregation decision of Brown v. Board of Education.

In 1956, Democrats express their opposition to Brown v. Board of Education in the "Southern Manifesto." One hundred and one members of Congress—all but four of them Democrats—sign the manifesto.

In 1957, Republican President Eisenhower authors a Civil Rights Bill, hoping to repair the damage done to blacks and their civil rights by Democrats since 1892. Passage of the bill is blocked by Senate Democrats. When the bill finally goes through, it is significantly weakened due to lack of support from Democrats.

In 1960, Republican Senator Everett Dirksen authors a Voting Rights Bill, again, in an effort to undo the disenfranchisement of blacks by Democrats through poll taxes, literacy tests, and threats of violence by the KKK. And once again, Senate Democrats attempt (though in the end unsuccessfully) to block passage of the bill.

In 1964, Congress passes, and President Lyndon Johnson signs into law, the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This is essentially the law originally authored by Eisenhower in 1957. Democrats, including still-serving Senator Robert Byrd (a former KKK member), employ a filibuster of the bill. Once the filibuster is overcome, a larger percentage of Republicans vote for passage than do Democrats.

In 1965, Congress passes, and President Lyndon Johnson signs into law, the Voting Rights Act of 1964. This is the law originally authored by Eisenhower in 1959. A filibuster is prevented, and passage of this bill also enjoys support from a greater percentage of Republicans than Democrats

If you would like more proof...... www.abovetopsecret.com...
Southern Guardian you may now dissect my post, take it out of context and twist it as much as you like (figured I would give you permission because your going to do it anyway).

reply to post by Stewie


I have come to the conclusion that the entire government is corrupt. Both parties seem selfish and don't really care about the people. All they care about is getting elected, having a nice paycheck, and a short work week. The only time they seem interested in our needs is during an election year.

You do know that nothing from this post of yours has anything to do with the financial crises or how the Democratic congress caused the recession? You just argued that the Democrats held a racist past, much in contradiction to what they stand for now, and just furthered my point towards Stewie?

Why don't you stop and actually read, thanks.

Originally posted by Quadrivium
reply to post by Southern Guardian

 

What's the difference between democrats of the 1960's and Today?

They are a lot smarter for one.
Or the progressives that joined them in 1960-1964 were smarter.
They switched from the republicans to the Dems during this time.

Oh, you mean the so called progressives that opposed the 1964 civil rights act ending segregation? Those 'progressives' that left the Democratic party for the Republican party?

Anyway, the Progressives in the republican party were able to look back almost 30 years and see the "minority shift". They teamed up with the Top Dems and passed the Civil Rights bill in '64 (something the republicans had been trying to pass for years but were always blocked by the dems).

So you are blaming the Democrats for passing the civil rights act before the Republicans did? Yes many Republicans supported the civil rights act as with the Democrats, but most opposed it at the time. The Republicans used what they called the Southern strategy:

It was called "the southern strategy," started under Richard M. Nixon in 1968, and described Republican efforts to use race as a wedge issue -- on matters such as desegregation and busing -- to appeal to white southern voters.

www.washingtonpost.com...

Here was the Republican party presidential nominee Barry Goldwater in 1964:



The Republicans prior to the 60's atleast stood for liberty as they did in the 19th century, that all changed with the Southern shift and in turn the Southern strategy. As for the old Democrats? Anybody who argues that the old Democrats held better positions in the interest of the people then than at current are over their heads, and your arguments so clearly put it to my point.

So today we have a lot of the minorities enslaves by the state (entitlement programs) and their vote goes to the party that keeps them there. Pretty smart of them huh?

What does the civil rights act of 1964 have to do with entitlement programmes again?

Read the following and you will get a clearer picture. Prior to 1960 most Dems were openly racist.

Yes I am well aware of that. President Johnson remarked at the passing of the civil rights act that they 'lost the Southern block', Republicans took the opportunity to move those former pro-segregation Democratic party voters to their side. The policies of the Democratic party then was not in the interests of the people, and? You are just furthering my point again.

Southern Guardian you may now dissect my post, take it out of context and twist it as much as you like (figured I would give you permission because your going to do it anyway).

It makes no difference how I reply to you. You make choices over what arguments you choose to make and I reply to them accordingly. Make a better argument next time if you don't like the way I reply to you.

reply to post by bobs_uruncle

Interesting history, thanks for sharing.
I think we, as a people in the world, should not pass up this opportunity to throw out the criminal cabal that has brought such pain onto so many people. It may just take a spontaneous action by the masses around the world as you say, I am all for it. But, I would like to see some guillotines rolled out, and not for people that disagree with me, but for these evil, secret society types that orchestrate destruction for their own personal gain.
I think we can find them.

reply to post by Stewie


So you think at least in the short term, the Republicans are the solution?? Some people have short memories!

Refresh my memory, who (as in which party) got us in this mess in the first place?

reply to post by whaaa

???
Hatred? Read your post! Try a little less reading "between" the lines, and a little more reading THE lines. I think everyone, except you apparently, understood what I meant by "slaughter".
Bring it?
Really, now.
I am not the one segregating people into the left and the right, the north and the south as it were, YOU are. I did not insult you, I merely stated I do not see YOU as the opposite of me, but you read between the wrong lines I suppose.
Peace.

It's a dream for us to disband both the corrupt Democrat and Republican parties (for both serve the same globalist elite masters), but the globalist U.S. government would just not budge.

reply to post by MrXYZ

First, I think people are the solution. It just so happens that to have any real chance of getting elected, you have to run as a Democrat or a Republican.
Frankly, I don't think we have either in office, we have a criminal class.
If you stop and think about it, who is destroying our country? Who is destroying what it means to BE a Democrat for example? Answer, the Democrats. The same for the Republicans, most would prefer another choice because no one likes these guys. They are only a better choice because they are an unknown, over a known piece of crap which are the incumbent class.
Democrats lined up behind Obama, Pelosi, and Reid. They will pay for not representing the people, not even their OWN people. Pharmaceutical companies, Insurance companies, Wall Street, yes. You and me, no.
We have a federal government OWNED by international powerful corporations policed by an out of control CIA, and we have to get it back, somehow.

Originally posted by Stewie

Reign in the executive branch. Prosecute the Wall Street criminals. Establish a REAL 911 commission. Review ALL DUAL CITIZENSHIP CITIZENS!! Especially, our "friends", the Israelis. Let's END their influence in Washington NOW.

What do YOU think?

Wow! all of these things sounds great mate, but do honestly believe that the Republicans will go through and do all the things above for the American people Stewie?

Isn't that a bit naive?

And seriously, would GOP rally for the prosecution the Wall Street criminals & the Banksters and review dual citizenship Israelis?

Man! sorry to say this, but!...I don't think so!

Neither side of the political aisle would do such a thing in the U.S I'm afraid!

That would need a divine miracle for that to happen!

For the "people" to take back the power in the U.S you need first to dismantle the power-structure and the power of influence in politics by the mega corporations - and reverse the Supreme Court's decision that their corporations has the same right as a person.

Then you need to deal with the pesky Lobbyists, and dismantle their power-structure and power of influence, so they're not able to corrupt the representatives of the "people" anymore.

And if that was not enough, you would still need to get the Fed Reserve out of the equation as well.

The "people" in the U.S would unfortunately not be free nor have any fair chance in hell to change anything until these three things are happening! - no matter of what team you're voting for - it doesn't matter, Red nor Blue!

The only thing that can change the status quo and the current situation would be a world wide revolution since the problem has gone global - but most of the sheeple are unfortunately still asleep worldwide, so that wouldn't happen either unless some genius finds some new miraculous way of waking them up quickly before it's too late.

Sorry to say this mate, but the future looks dark and grim my friend - soon, all of us will be living in a global regionalised version of their Fascist and fedualistic surveillance society of the NewWorldOrder!

reply to post by ironfalcon

For the first time, on the ballot in my county, there were Libertarians running for most of the offices. I voted for practically every one of them.
We have a huge problem, but we can fix it. Hopefully without blood in the streets and people hauled off to camps somewhere.

reply to post by Chevalerous

Your vision of the future is dark! Accurate, maybe.
I may be naive, a dreamer. In fact, I know I am a dreamer, but I also act upon my convictions.
I have seen it happen, that is one person can make a difference. If we sit back and wait for this mass awakening I am afraid we will be disappointed. Not everyone has to act, but enough do. What is enough? I don't know.
Doing nothing is not an option for those that understand what we are up against. It may be as little as spreading truth, or as much as running for office. One thing we cannot do is to fight the wrong enemy, ourselves.

Originally posted by Stewie
One thing we cannot do is to fight the wrong enemy, ourselves.

Perhaps you need to tell that to Rush, Sean, Palin, Savage, ORiley, Beck, Medved and Boortz because their whole program is to divide the American people into a "we" "them" paradigm and it's working quite well as many people even here on ATS seem to have adopted their ideology of hate and division.

Democrats to be slaughtered and they deserve it!,

I'm not reading between the lines here sir, their message is clear as a bell.

It will take divine intervention to break down the barriers of hate that the rightwing talkshow hosts have erected.
It's obvious, at least to me, that the rightwing stratagy is to divide and conquer, to foster a Fascist state in America. Scapegoating is just part of the plan.

Sound familiar. If not read...."The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich"

no more republicrats no more fed reserve no more being paid in scrip-frn and we must have term limits period. never trust your govt and always question authority remember they all work for us no if and or buts about it

Yeah get rid of those Democrats and let's get back to the party that brought us:

To the brink of economic collapse
Brought us the loss of our rights with the patriot act (to protect us)
destroyed our honor in the face of the world by using torture against "enemy combatants"
handed over more control to corporate interests
helped the insurance companies to deny needed medical care to human beings

I could go on all night but yes vote republican because Obama is really Hitler you know.

reply to post by whaaa

Perhaps you can post some of the more objectionable quotes from these people. I do not watch television at all.
I am not happy with the federal government at all. I don't see the labels the same way as you I guess. I don't like to be labeled as "extreme" because then I start to think that these people are indoctrinated robots that consider individual human thought to be "extreme", because that is all I have to offer.
I would like to see the federal government reigned in, I don't care what labels do it. Nothing less than our future is at stake.

reply to post by damwel

I think you will find that the economic crisis took many years in the making, all with the blessing of Democrats and Republicans alike. But, see, they only dress a certain way, with a Donkey or an Elephant pinned on their breast. They are simply criminals.
I believe you can have an honest Democrat and an honest Republican discuss ideas. This hostility is nothing but state sponsored sabotage of the American people.
Obama has not attempted to reverse the oppression of the past administration, but has exacerbated the problem by enlarging an unaccountable federal government.

Originally posted by Use your brain
I'll see you in four years when the exact same thing is being said about the republicans. Anyone buying into either side's ideology at this point is borderline mentally retarded in my opinion.

...And that's it in a nutshell. The partisan crap doesn't get anywhere. It's all the same cabal anyway. I think that all of the partisan talking points and the seeming diametrical social issues are simply ways to keep us from seeing the real problem, give us a false sense of being able to 'do something', and honestly... keep us and them entertained. I think most people buy it, not out of sheer stupidity but because they need to feel that they can control it somehow. They are fooling themselves for the false sense of comfort it gives.

Originally posted by Stewie
I don't like to be labeled as "extreme" because then I start to think that these people are indoctrinated robots that consider individual human thought to be "extreme", because that is all I have to offer.

You don't like to be labeled as "extreme" yet you offer up this little gem.

Democrats to be slaughtered and they deserve it!,

And this is exactly the thing that Rush, Sean and Savage would say.

To me that sounds very extreme and that's why I said "Bring it" because I'm a Democrat.

Perhaps if you temper your rhetoric you might sound more convincing. So far....Fail

How do you propose to bring the two sides together when most of what you offer is hatred of Obama.

reply to post by whaaa

At the polls.
I brought my sources, and yes, I believe they deserve it. If you honestly believe they have represented YOU, or if they HAVE represented YOU, you are in a clear minority.
Don't worry, you have protection in law, no one is going to try to hurt you.

Originally posted by Stewie
reply to post by whaaa

 

At the polls.
I brought my sources, and yes, I believe they deserve it. If you honestly believe they have represented YOU, or if they HAVE represented YOU, you are in a clear minority.
Don't worry, you have protection in law, no one is going to try to hurt you.

That's what they said to the Jews