It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dJbdJb
... and I think they (ETs) would send something clearer if they wanted to communicate with us.
D.
Originally posted by tallpaul1984
This is a very compelling thread indeed!!
I was just wondering however; you say you altered the pitch of the file in order to make it audible to human ears, I am just curious to know if it would make any difference to the image if it was displayed unaltered.
regards,
Paul
Originally posted by dJbdJb
Could the symmetry not have been added by the software that you recorded the sound with? I'm not saying that you did it on purpose to hoax us or anything, but it could just be accidental.
Hear me out...
The original sound was in mono, and you recorded it from youtube onto whatever software you used. If you are recording in stereo, then the mono signal will be duplicated on to 2-track stereo resulting in two identical tracks (symmetry). It will automatically do this so that the sound isn't only coming out of one speaker. You should try it recording other mono signals on to stereo.
Personally I think you're all looking for things that aren't there. I've had a good scan of the image, and I think they (ETs) would send something clearer if they wanted to communicate with us.
D.edit on 28-10-2010 by dJbdJb because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ch1n1t0
Hi D.
The audio I worked on wasn't downloaded from youtube, it was downloaded from the Cassini original website, so it's the closest to original source we can get. It is in mono and I have worked it in mono. You can see this by watching the video I upped and noticing how both the left and right channel always go together. Also, what you're seeing here can't be resulting from stereo sound. First, because there's no such, and second, because such symmetry can't be produced by combining the left and right signals into mono and then feeding it through a spectrogram, UNLESS, the left and right signal are tonal mirrors of each other. In plain English, this means that if you have an A-B-C-D note/frequency/tone pattern in your left channel, you will need the exact opposite, D-C-B-A pattern to be present in the same time.
I'm only explaining this fyi, as it is important to show how these could've emerged in various ways, however, this way is not relevant to the subject.
Thanks for your input, as this was something I already thought about but haven't written anywhere yet.
Also, there's no possible way my software to have accidentally created those mirror frequencies with this certain signal only. Remember, I've been doing this for the last 10 years and I would've seen the same discrepancy appear at least once.
EDIT - also when speaking about MONO, this is not exactly symmetry, at least not mirror. When having MONO signal you have two 100% identical signals playing in both your left and right speaker. This, however, doesn't imply MIRROR symmetry as shown in the spectrogram. Because the second signal should've been inverted to the total opposite of the first signal. Which automatically excludes MONO as the signals that will be playing will be totally different from one another in spectral characteristics, making them 100% different in audible aspect.edit on 28-10-2010 by ch1n1t0 because: addedit on 28-10-2010 by ch1n1t0 because: (no reason given)
Echo effect - On Earth, lightning produces a similar low frequency radio signal. The radio waves then bounce back and forth between the ground and the upper reaches of our atmosphere. This echo effect enhances some frequencies and lets others die out, resulting in signals with precisely defined frequencies, similar to what was detected on Titan. The water ice that makes up Titan's exterior is a poor reflector of radio waves, so if the signal comes from an echo effect like that on Earth, there would have to be a more reflective material below the surface. An ocean of liquid water beneath the surface could do the job, the team says. "We do not need a subsurface ocean but require a subsurface reflector," Simoes told New Scientist. "If a subsurface ocean exists, the solid-liquid interface would be a good reflector."
EDIT - If that would be the case, wouldn't we be observing such symmetries more than once?edit on 28-10-2010 by ch1n1t0 because: 2nd edit
Originally posted by theukbloke
EDIT - If that would be the case, wouldn't we be observing such symmetries more than once?edit on 28-10-2010 by ch1n1t0 because: 2nd edit
I think we are seeing such things in your image - it looks like signal deamplification combined with reflection over a short amount of time i.e.origanal radio wave looks like this
ABCDABCD
reflected looks like this
dcbadcba
new reflection looks like
abcdabcd
........ . .........cutting it short
I think signal falloff thru mirroring makes art
Originally posted by 11118
A significant point to note is that the message is coming from Saturn.
Doing research on Saturn the planet in itself in historical context as well as physical appearance is quite an amusing trail of bread crumbs.