Lights Over El Paso, TX October 15, 2010 (SOLVED/Identified - SkyDivers)

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
How can there be a streak of light, which suddenly turns into 3 lights, with no streaks, and which hovers in mid-air for a while without looking like they're falling, and why did the lights suddenly vanish?

Three parachutists holding hands jump out of an aircraft with fireworks attached to their feet. These parachutists are so close together that from far away the fire works look like one big fire work. As they are falling 120 mph making one big streak behind them, the parachutists separate in 3 different directions so they can pull their parachute cord and not crash into each other, which creates 3 different streaks.

Once they pull the parachute cord, BAM!, they instantly go from 120 mph to 12 mph experiencing from 3 to 4 G's of force. Once they are going 12 mph (very slow and looks like they are hovering) the streaks from the fire works are no more. They are just a small fountain of fire, and from far away look like a single point of light.

Because the sky is black, and because the camera is following them, you can't tell they are moving at all. Once the fire works burn out, they are hidden in the darkness, and appear to "suddenly vanish".

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
Wouldn't the light go with them all the way to the ground?

Depends how long the fireworks were made to last, and how long it took them to reach the ground.

Originally posted by xxshadowfaxx
What would have caused the lights to streak like that, creating a tail, surely a skydiver can't move that fast....?

Skydivers fall at 120 mph, that is fast. That would create a nice streak. Those are display fireworks too... the sparks are made to last for a second or so.

Airforce Airshow planes, balloons, chinese lanterns, meteor, flares real deal flares, meteor, chinese lanterns, balloons, Airforce Airshow Planes

Be funny if the military was given a schedule (by the real deals) and the real deal happens sometime next week>

Get everyone primed to think balloons, flares, chinese lanterns, airplane, helicopters. (when the real deal) shows up.
(Good move by Airforce and Navy) you got a thumbs up from me

FIRE and Parachutes??? Those be some real smarty pants...what a safe combination

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Mr. D

 

Good idea.
You should get right on it. First you'll have to find out what time the sighting was made though.
Or, you could believe what the officials of the airshow said and compare the OP video to other videos.

Sorry i fail to see that, skydivers at night?
skeptics at been worse,and believing the officials is like believing and saying that the recession is really over.

And also i fail the see the video as a 3 skydivers team

Unless we got proof proving they were actually skydivers then we will put this to rest, but why are you believing the air force and navy? thats what they said about the UFO Crash of 1947 now the military is coming with new lies

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Sorry i fail to see that, skydivers at night?
skeptics at been worse,and believing the officials is like believing and saying that the recession is really over.

And also i fail the see the video as a 3 skydivers team

What is your opinion about this video?

Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Oh good video.. What a bomb shell at the end though to find out that there was an air show going on and they were doing maneuvers....

The op's video doesn't look like flares. The trail of light that flares leave behind them. Flares burn unevenly that's why the trail of light left behind them is all broken up just look at the video of the skydivers the trail is all broken with pieces going everywhere. Now look at the op's video the trail of light is solid from the beginning to the the part of the video where they begin to hover. I saw many night jumps when I was stationed at El Paso and none of them even came close to the op's video.

Originally posted by maluminse
I was mentioning yesterday regarding our response if a few refuse to believe. Belgium (of course) has taken the lead in determining a response. This part of this UFO series is interesting and a step in the direction of recognition.

edit on 16-10-2010 by maluminse because: add vid

I just downloaded the COMETA doc mentioned in the vid. Very good info on UFO testimonies, overall very interesting read. Thanks for sharing.

Originally posted by 0ne10

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
Sorry i fail to see that, skydivers at night?
skeptics at been worse,and believing the officials is like believing and saying that the recession is really over.

And also i fail the see the video as a 3 skydivers team

What is your opinion about this video?

They dont match, the flares aren't the same, not to mention the formation doesn't tell me.

reply to post by buster2010


I agree they are not flares... they are fireworks.

However, "flares" is a common name for some fireworks.

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter


So are you saying these following images do not look the same?


"UFOs"

Golden Knights

"UFOs"

Golden Knights

Here is the same exact image, however, I added "blur" and made it "greyscale".

Golden Knights

Looks exactly identical.

"UFOs"

The camera for the UFO was out of focus, and set to black and white for some odd reason. If the Golden Knights camera was zoomed out a bit more, the trails would appear shorter and smaller. If it was out of focus and set to black and white it would look 100% identical.

Sorry still they aren't the same, its funny skeptics not buying the eyewitness account.

The camera for the UFO was out of focus, and set to black and white for some odd reason. If the Golden Knights camera was zoomed out a bit more, the trails would appear shorter and smaller. If it was out of focus and set to black and white it would look 100% identical.

to claim this you have to prove it.
and skeptics also believe the government that the UFO crash in 1947 was a weather balloon right?
skeptics haven't changed there methods, only now you and other skeptics will attack users for believing if this was UFO or otherwise.

reply to post by Agent_USA_Supporter


Please, list all the differences in the images then.

Also, what did the witnesses say that skeptical people are not buying? Please list what they said.

reply to post by 0ne10

The camera for the UFO was out of focus, and set to black and white for some odd reason.

How do you know the camera was set to black and white, maybe the objects were the color we see..

BTW, I agree when you change the GK film to greyscale it does look closer.

reply to post by scitpeks


If you watch it again, you can see it really does like like black and white...

I was so hoping this was the one we're looking for. I don't know if it is though.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Mr. D

 

Good idea.
You should get right on it. First you'll have to find out what time the sighting was made though.
Or, you could believe what the officials of the airshow said and compare the OP video to other videos.

Phage, do you want me to do all of your work for you? I thought you were the debunker here?

Originally posted by Aggie Man
I'm inclined to go with the Golden Knights explanation, as it is the most plausible. However, I looked up their schedule and they are listed as being in Atlanta, GA on October 16 & 17.

October
2-3 MCAS Miramar, CA Open
9-10 Little Rock AFB, AR -----Open
16-17 Open -----Atlanta, GA
23-24 Open Army Ten-Miler
30-31 Fort Worth Alliance, TX ---- Open

indytransponder.blogspot.com...

Maybe, just maybe...their schedule suddenly changed this morning....after last night's unexplained lights? Is it possible? Or is that beyond the government to do such a thing? Anybody have a different schedule that is dated before October 15th that places the Golden Knights in El Paso?

Is it possible for someone to film the performance, including a complete descent so that we could make a more accurate comparison? Thanks

reply to post by Mr. D

My work is pretty much done.
It was the Golden Knights.

Originally posted by SonicInfinity
Guys, it doesn't matter if it was skydivers or not. Phage's logic is absolute, and anyone who argues against him obviously has absolutely no idea what they're talking about and needs to do more research.

No one's logic is absolute. I'm not trying to get testy here, but I think it's appropriate enough for everyone to present their own thoughts or evidence, and allow everyone else to come to their own conclusion. It's dangerous to say that only one person has all of the information. JMHO. Thanks

reply to post by Phage

My work is pretty much done.
It was the Golden Knights.

Yes and thankyou for your opinion.