It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by havok
Here's the real thought of this 'apology'.
Since that took place 60 years ago...
...What have they done since?
And how bad will it get?
I imagine that if one knew that answer, they would go insane.
The pattern held true from "Star Trek: The Motion Picture" through "Star Trek Insurrection". Unlike the majority of the "Star Trek" films, "Star Trek Insurrection" hinged on a moral question, rather than a practical one. The question of whether the needs of the many should permit the exploitation of the few. Star Trek Insurrection's answer that the few could never be exploited and dispossessed, regardless of the great benefits this exploitation would bring to the many, did not sit well with critics, many of whom like Roger Ebert protested that they would actually support Admiral Doughery's actions and in doing so only further demonstrated the timeliness of the ideas in the movie they were attacking. We live in a WallMart world driven by consumerism and the lowest deal, living by buying shoddy products from third world countries made by slave or child labor. Not only do the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, but we live in an economy where the needs of the few outweigh the needs of the many. The Son'a with their plastic surgery and their greedy pursuit of youth represent a mirror for our culture and society. The Ba'ku by contrast, with their emphasis on a peaceful and simple life, represent an alternative path.
There are different conclusions as to the purpose of non-interference. One is that the ends do not justify the means. No matter how well-intentioned, stepping in and effecting change could have disastrous consequences. Another conclusion (strongly implied in the ENT episode "Dear Doctor") is a belief that evolution has a "plan" of sorts, driving species toward purposes. Interference would therefore be unnatural, in that it would go against what is supposed to happen to the species in question.
Originally posted by Faiol
why only 16 flags? well, probably because most americans dont want to even read this news
I mean ... didnt the nazis do that to some kind of group of people, anyone remember?
isnt that ... the freaking same ???????????????????????????????????????? ...
edit on 2/10/10 by Faiol because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Icarus Rising
Now, according to the US government, these atrocities were perpetrated over 60 years ago. I'm sure this is just the tip of the iceberg. If this is what they are willing to admit to, who knows what other heinous acts they are still hiding? It puts all the stories of the US government testing biological agents on unsuspecting populations at home and abroad in a new light.