the LHC, solar flares and 2012, this is how they are linked and why!

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by theAymen

 

Here is what I wrote:

I live at 37N and I have seen the northern lights in my area in the last decade. The historic maximum was not 1958. Again you seem to be making things up. It's getting to be an obvious pattern that others have pointed out.

You quoted me and wrote:

tut tut..that comment was copy & pasted from wikipedia..there was no need to make anything up.

That is a lie.

Here is your response:

firstly...stop calling me a liar..i never claimed its 100% fact.

That is a second lie. I never called you a liar.

Now you shout out another off topic straw man argument

WHY WOULD YOU WANT ME BANNED....AND HOW OFTEN DO YOU DO THIS TO PEOPLE.

Why are you making a lame attempt to divert attention from the obvious fact that you have posted a string of falsehoods in this thread?

Posting lies is frowned on. A simple way to stop people from pointing out your falsehoods is to stop posting falsehoods.

Since you have stooped to this level of discourse it seems safe to say that you cannot defend any of the items you have claimed. Thanks for admitting in your own coarse way that you are mistaken about these issues.

ahahha..i got to laugh...is this not the 2012 forum...then you talk about falsehoods...lol cmon do you see the irony....its a speculative thread in a speculative forum...

you called me a liar then you say you didnt in the next breath tutut...the solar flare article is from wikipedia..and it tells you. i actually took your point seriously enough to check it out as you sounded kind of right.
but you werent...read it, its probable the sames source you used to say it has an 11 year gap...but read on..
because there is a window of variation in the maximum periods which could last many years.

dont take it as fact...its a theory based on the myth of 2012...im not losing sleep over it

reply to post by theAymen


Please show me where I called you a liar. That is a lie. Just because I point out where you do not tell the truth does not mean I called you a liar. Is that a label you want to affix to yourself? I certainly did not do that. No matter how hard you try I dare you to go back to any of my posts and show where I called you a liar. You can't, because I didn't.

its a speculative thread in a speculative forum.

Speculating is quite different from posting falsehoods. A falsehood has no chance of happening. A speculation is possible. What we can hope to show is whether a speculative event is likely or not.

I see you took the time to read and learn that "cycles" are there, but not regualr. If they were regular like the passage of time it would be easy to make some types of predictions, but alas the length of a cycle is often given with the understanding that it is the mean time for the event to occur. Many times as in this case it is important to understand the caveats of the number. Kudos to you for understanding this important issue.

reply to post by dragnet53


Wow another pointless post. I know that I gave a star. I also know I have star some of your posts dragnet53. When you post good material I star it. I am not adding a star to this pointless post.

reply to post by dragnet53


Who would have thought that you'd make a pointless and vague post? I would for one since that is your norm.

Aren't you a bit suspicious about a post putting the time of the mythical great flood some 9000 years before the times you've posted?

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by theAymen

 

Please show me where I called you a liar. That is a lie.

um...just there

Speculating is quite different from posting falsehoods. A falsehood has no chance of happening. A speculation is possible. What we can hope to show is whether a speculative event is likely or not.

really?
firstly go familiarize yourself with string theory.
did you see the post on the first page by an astrophysist from harvard....i think he knows more than you.
it seems like this has more weight then what even i first thought.

this is definatley a speculation. forget "when" the flares could happen...but when they do....wev never collided atoms at that speed during a magnetic storm...

as for the jupiter point...the fact that it loses its bands before...do you think it correlates with the solar maximums.ie when the sun is more active...gases in the solar system are effected???

I see you took the time to read and learn that "cycles" are there, but not regualr. If they were regular like the passage of time it would be easy to make some types of predictions, but alas the length of a cycle is often given with the understanding that it is the mean time for the event to occur. Many times as in this case it is important to understand the caveats of the number. Kudos to you for understanding this important issue.

i didnt read anything.....its common sense

reply to post by theAymen


TheAymen.....

Regarding my recommendation that you compare & contrast your thread material with that of the previously plagiarised thread that used prettywell identical imagery to you, thereby effectively stating there are links between things where no links exist in reality.....

Did you do that?

Have you arrived at any conclusions?

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not
reply to post by theAymen

 

TheAymen.....

Regarding my recommendation that you compare & contrast your thread material with that of the previously plagiarised thread that used prettywell identical imagery to you, thereby effectively stating there are links between things where no links exist in reality.....

Did you do that?

Have you arrived at any conclusions?

i have arrived at a conclusion yes..... though im sure you dont want to hear it.

as for comparing the threads...yes i have...it was an interesting read...the section on egypt had me drooling.
but as for similarites he doesnt mention the sun once or a magnetic storm....the content is not relevant to my points which have stated over & over....

as for the pictures...im not lucky enough to have been to the lhc to take my own images..these would do just fine.
its cool that you think the pictures are similar...its of the same thing!!! lol

i could of easily of used the images from that thread...why not!...my content is what counts..not images from google that illustrates and helps the reader visualise the content in the text of my thread

reply to post by theAymen


Ok so what you are saying is I shouldn't expect the sun to somehow energize the Arch so much that the statue over a mile away somehow starts walking out of a building (that it was never inside to begin with) that does not look like a womb (though you say it does).
Gasp.
Or no? Was the photo of St. Louis actually at all related to your thread?

eta: I also wanted to remind you of my request to include photos of Heidi Klum in your next thread to "tart it up" as you say.

reply to post by Chamberf=6


lolol...no mate its just art....but from that angle it looks like they line up...

is it freakin u out! lol...its nothing, i saw it on google when i was searching for wormholes, i liked it so i added it.

Originally posted by theAymen
reply to post by Chamberf=6

 

lolol...no mate its just art....but from that angle it looks like they line up... Is it freakin u out! lol...its nothing, i saw it on google when i was searching for wormholes, i liked it so i added it.

TheAyman.....

lol...its nothing

That's the problem.....

None of the material makes sense.

In that sense, as for the material...

"lol...its nothing"

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

reply to post by theAymen


I think you are getting the the distinction between a liar and someone who tells a lie. You point to a place where I do NOT call you a liar and you use that for evidence. I think you are learning. That's good.

firstly go familiarize yourself with string theory.

It is abundantly clear that even the simplest of scientific issues is a difficulty for you. Your utter failures to even understand electrolysis is a good example of that.

Your suggestion that using the LHC in a magnetic storm is shear nonsense since you can't show that the sun's magnetic field or any effects from that field can be detected at the LHC.

So now you ask me if I think that Jupiter's cloud bands are affected by the sun. Well let's see here. Astronomers cannot determine the cause of the missing band and they know more than us so I'll pass and see what those with the knowledge, expertise, and instruments can tell us.

Finally, you admit that you did not read the material. That's no surprise to me. Your claims sure sound like someone with no knowledge of the material.

Originally posted by Maybe...maybe not

Originally posted by theAymen
reply to post by Chamberf=6

 

lolol...no mate its just art....but from that angle it looks like they line up... Is it freakin u out! lol...its nothing, i saw it on google when i was searching for wormholes, i liked it so i added it.

TheAyman.....

lol...its nothing

That's the problem.....

None of the material makes sense.

In that sense, as for the material...

"lol...its nothing"

Kind regards
Maybe...maybe not

my material would make sense if you understood string theory.

i want to ask you something...it seems like, even when you urinate, you get a star..!!

but stereologist gets 2 everytime he posts you get one....does he outrank you...is he your super mod.
cmon mr mod tut tit

reply to post by stereologist


so whats your beef exactly...?

if the lhc was made to contact dimensions/gods then it wouldnt be mankinds first attempt...
Pharaoh SETI1 was famous for contacting the gods, is it a coincidence that our sattelites to contact ETs are called SETI.
is it a coincidence that the collider has been built at this time..just before 2012

this theory coincides perfectly for this forum

and the point i made on electrolysis....ok...take your mind way back ...in school when your teacher did an experiment in front of you..she got about a litre of water...and stuck two magnetic rods into the water.one - one +....she tuned on a current then on one rod positive ions gathered on the other negative...!!!
to add i also believe they used sound frequency to seperated the ions which generated electricity....the large pyramid powered the seb carnival next to the step pyramid......now attack!!! but this has nothing to do with my intitial theory.

reply to post by theAymen


Here you are pretending to understand anything whatsoever about string theory and you don not understand electrolysis.

Here is what you said.

ancient Egyptians knew how to extract electricity from water using electrolysis.

Now you state.

and stuck two magnetic rods into the water.one - one +

The rods are not magnetized in electrolysis.

Like I said before, you obviously don't understand even basic science. That's ok. Everyone has to start somewhere. There are so few things you get correct it almost looks like these are random occurrences in a lot of guesses and mistakes.

So let's get back to the original question you posted, "so whats your beef exactly." I believe I've already made it clear that almost all of what you post is wrong or confused. Your guess, not a theory, is a mess.

One thing I agree on is that your nonsense makes as little sense as the rest of what is posted in the hoax called 2012.

Originally posted by theAymen

Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by theAymen

 

Frankly, I haven't got a clue what you are attempting to convey in that post.

im just saying.."apparently" 12,500 years ago someone also called noah was predicting a catycalismic event.

Soooo..... You equate yourself to Noah?

IRM

Originally posted by dragnet53
careful there son. They are just baiting you to get banned. Their small weak egos need to be inflated. They don't want real talk and just want to spread disinfo. It is sad really.

Dragnet53 offering sage advice to theAymen....

It just doesn't get any better than that!!

To Stereologist, may I simply say that you are doing a wonderful, patient, and absolutely accurate job of demolishing ignorance. Well done.

You can tell it is absolutely accurate, by the way dragnet53 doesn't go near anything you have said, and theAymen can only resort to ignoring it and saying the absolute reverse.

dragnet has learnt well from promoting Apollo denial - the only way to fight the truth is to avoid it...

reply to post by InfaRedMan


no..!!??

NOAA satelilite and Noah 12,500 yrs ago.

reply to post by stereologist


awarded yourself 3 stars for that! lol cmon mate haha.

firstly string theory suggests there are other dimensions...the fabric of which differs to the local sun....with stars as gateways into/out of other dimensions.

electrolysys consists of extracting electricity from water yes...you think the rods are not magnetised cool..
but what has that got to do with my orginal post...

face it the egyptians could extract electrity from water...rods magnetised or not...
i hate the 2012 theory as much as the next man....but the lhc being fully functional intime for 2012...!!??

if the sun does have a polar shift..and does send massive solar flare our way...with a collider being used...

this is definatly an experiment into dimensions....

so share a point...do some research...then attack me with sence.

reply to post by theAymen

firstly string theory suggests there are other dimensions...the fabric of which differs to the local sun....with stars as gateways into/out of other dimensions.

If all you wanted to do was suggest the existence of other dimensions that there is no need to invoke string theory. After that your claims are simply word salad and unrelated to string theory. That figures since you have no idea what even a simple concept like electrolysis is.
1. Electrolysis is not extracting electricity form water.
2. The rods are often copper and carbon neither of which can be magnetized

Please provide any evidence that the Egyptians could extract electricity from water. This is just another ridiculous claim on your part.

The LHC was functional well before 2012. The year 2012 is nothing special.

You really need to take a basic course in science. The sun does not have pole shifts. The sun undergoes magnetic reversals on a regular basis, every 11 years on average. There is no evidence in anything you have posted that "this is definitely an experiment into dimensions." That's just another one of your unfounded inferences. The Earth is hit by higher power particles than anything the LHC can create on a regular basis. Can you show us where these natural experiments have definitely led to dimensions? No, because your claim is absurd.

Since nothing in your recent post makes any sense at all I strongly recommend a number of basic courses for you: electricity, magnetism, simple math, ancient history, chemistry and astronomy for starters.

Learn why you are completely mistaken about electrolysis, magnetic fields, ancient history, etc.