It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TortoiseKweek
Whoa, I have a problem with this...
The article says:
". . . On September 27, 2010,"
It's September 25 today! Am I missing something?
You may want to check out your sources and references first.
On September 27th, during a press conference at the National Press Club in Washington D.C. , six former U.S. Air Force officers and one former enlisted man will
Originally posted by TortoiseKweek
Either ATS has been hacked, or some one is playing games! It's not funny!! F*** off!!!
Originally posted by Simple
Never before published. that does not meann it has never been leaked. Any how this thread has been side tracked a bit with most discussing a photo. the real thing about this is that FOX news and other main stream news facilities are begining to cover this topic as if it was real ...
Originally posted by nonanonymous
reply to post by Frank Warren
1. Honestly I don't mean any disrespect. I just want the truth at this time (maybe when I find out the truth I might not want it)
2. Note, I didn't say the Profit is always the driver for these type of stories, but there are plenty that are driven by it. However,. On the contrary I think a more plausible explanation when High ranking officials are involved is that perhaps they have been commissioned to put out dis-information. Perhaps a few of them are not dis-info agents but they saw the latest human exotic military technology that they weren't suppose to see..
3. I'm glad that you specially corrected me on on the technicality of using the term "UFO" and "Alien" interchangeably.. However, if you were not talking about Aliens then this leads me to understand that you and those military men acknowledge that what they saw could still be from this earth and not under alien control?
Therefore obviously if you and those men are using the term "UFO" for its correct meaning then you nor them have any proof of alien technology. Then I ask why the big news conference?
If its not alien then why all the buzz for hidden technology that the government is hiding? If any thing the real buzz should be about government intrusions that have occurred that could cause us to go to war with another country, but that is not how the story is being presented.
As I said in my previous post, this lends creditability to the the "dis-info" conspiracy to hide military technology or the what not.. Why didn't they come out before, why now? Why no national security implications now for talking about classified incidents? wouldn't a authorized "dis-info" agent prevent them from any national security implications? I suppose you could say that it would look like the government is trying to hide something by prosecuting them.
However, I'm not trying to say yes or no aliens exists and our government knows about it, All I'm saying is that there are existing valid, realistic and logical scenarios that can't easily be overlooked which haven't been addressed. Therefore, its going to take a lot more than words from non active high ranking officials in order for people to FULLY (without a doubt) accept such and incredible leap of faith.
We need to answer why aren't those military men "dis-info" agents then we can talk about the truth of what they are saying. Note those men appear very convincing and honest but wouldn't a "dis-info" agent do the same if it was to protect the nations security and they were task to do so?
From the presented evidence to date it boils down to two possibility IMO:
A..True, an alien government cover up exists and our government is aware of it.
B. False, alien technology is a military cover up of exotic technologies.
Note: this is an improvement from a decade ago, where option "C" would have been included to list the UFO topic as a joke. I think the military men that have step forward have done away with option "C".
I don't think this press conference or book is going to prove (A) without a doubt.. Like it or not it appears that the government has done an outstanding job in covering this up with all the information and dis-information that exists out there. Therefore, like it or not its going to take concrete proof and not words unless the words themselves come from the president of which ever country you are from, but even then it would require concrete proof. Once again like it or not the president of a country with tangible proof will be the official disclosure not an author.
I would not be surprised if the "UFO" topic would not be included as material for the CIA/FBI to study as a form of intelligence handling. ,