It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by mishigas
im still trying to figure that out myself
constitution does give freedom of religion and since sharia law is a major part of any muslim the constitution guarantees the freedom to practice sharia law
stoning and hanging and cutting off womens noses etc is legal under sharia law since it trumps us constitutional rights they can not be prosecuted.
now see how they can twist that?
[edit on 14-8-2010 by neo96]
Originally posted by dreamwalker74
reply to post by dreamwalker74
Look simple thing we we should be asking: "Do any of you back Shariah law"? If so explain why. This goes out to every Muslim and Non Muslim, specifically in the U.S. Why would you ever support Shariah law?
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by neo96
Exactly. What they fail to admit is that to a muslim, the religion is the law. A mosque is much more than a simple place to worship.
You're right about sharia trumping American law.
Look at Britain. I had a Brit tell me recently that the US is only a few years away from what has happened to the UK.
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
Could you explain how the president exactly failed on this issue? By upholding the freedom and rights of all americans of all backrounds his a failure? Aside from the other policies and actions he has made that I will in some cases agree with you on, your view on his decision as faliure on demonstrates your unwillingness to acknowledge true freedom in this country.
Yes, he could have remained silent on this issue. Instead he used it to further his be nice and make the Arabs feel good agenda. He should consider American "Feelings" first. He should have just kept his mouth shut on this one.
He did not in any meaningful way do one single thing he promissed.
Like what? The healthcare plan? The healthcare plan we ended up with was corporate infested but as much as we can blame the president for not having pushed the public option enough, we must remember that a portion of the Democrats voted against it. The issue is not just the president himself when it comes the healthcare bill, the issue stems to both parties.
He failed to close Guantánamo Bay. He has yet to end the wars. And he chickend out on healthcare.
Hillary would have been an excellent President.
How so? Her policies were 99% in line with Obama's and considering there are Democrats just as much in the tank for big business as there are Republicans, I fail to see what exactly would have changed?
She along with Bill would have brought much more experience and wisdom to the White House. She also would not be kissing the rear end of the Arabs. Don't get me wrong I have nothing against the Arabs I am against our president kissing their rear ends.
So you think Dan Quayle is going to replace Hillary Clinton for you? If thats the case then your support for Hillary or prior support for Obama certainly does not appear to be on the issues or policies.
Presidents have limited power. Dan Quayle now has the experience and wisdom brought by life to make good decisions for the country. His political agenda would be appropriately "balanced" by Congress.
In my opinion DQ would be a better president than Obama.
Originally posted by dreamwalker74
reply to post by dreamwalker74
Here's where I personally stop on your logic wheel.
Radical Muslims have attacked a major U.S. city, have killed thousands of U.S. citizens. Yet only ten years later, they want to put a mosque,
led by a questionable Imam,
who is getting $100,000,000 in support from "unknown sources",
on a site where thousands died because of a direct result of radical islamists.
That stopped my "logic wheel" right there.
Originally posted by dreamwalker74
reply to post by ~Lucidity
Dear Lucidity, If you had lost a Mother, Father, Or even a close friend, I tend to believe you would be throwing a Holey Fit.
and I would be backing you. Explain your PC mentality, to the mother who lost her husband and the two and three year olds she had in day care in the buildings.
Some people will NEVER get over this, and I support them till the end.
Originally posted by mishigas
When you make unfounded accusations against a person or a group, be prepared to defend yourself. Like with a linky thing to proof that the TPM "are protesting mosques all over the country now".
Sure. How about this one?
Tea Party Movement Protests Mosques Across USA
Maybe this one?
California Tea Party will bring dogs to anti-mosque protest
Funny, all I really meant was thanks tea party for fomenting this anti-American hate-filled, protest anything not White, Christian, and Republican for giving us the atmosphere the welcomes groups of angry morons to protest angry moron ideals but hey I found the links anyway.
“An Islamic Mosque is planned to be built in Temecula. Islam is not a religion. It is a worldwide political movement meant on domination of the world. And it is meant to subjugate all people under Islamic law … Islam treats women as second class people and they also hate dogs. Women are forbidden to sing and dogs are killed. We will not be submissive to Shariah Law.
Originally posted by dreamwalker74
reply to post by ~Lucidity
I who lost two friends, care quite a bit. The only difference is I've pulled my head out of the sand long enough to identify the enemy.
I'm not a religeous man, I don't forgive. I don't forget.
I will not allow the assimilation of my county to the people who perpetrated this.
I will not forget. I WILL NOT FOGIVE!
I will fight to see that every time any radical religion regardless of what it is threatens thousands if not millions of my fellow citizens, I am first in line to not only point it out, but stop it if I can.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Magnus47
it took decades for americans animosity towards japanese to subside
9 years is not nearly long enough for some feelings to go away
as to americans owning america not hardly its almost to the point where more foreigners own a substantial part of america
Originally posted by dreamwalker74
reply to post by neo96
We still haven't forgiven the Nazi's. They never hurt the U.S. Near as much as the radicall Muslims.
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Muslims would never let the west build a Haliburton office in Central baghdad... so why should we let them build a mosque at ground zero.
there' needs to be some cultural sensitivity .
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by whatukno
I forgot... what is the Sharia equivalent of Freedom of Speech and Religion again? You want us to celebrate the stoning of women and hanging of homoseshuals because....???
Let's compare apples with apples, i.e., law with law, Constitution with Sharia. Not religion vs law, or islam vs Constitution.
How about American law Vs. American law?
Why do you need to stretch so far to try and make it out to be something else? This is only about American law- under which they have the right to build that mosque but not the right to stone anyone to death. There are over 100 mosques in NYC now. Is stoning legal there now?
Originally posted by mishigas
The NYT? Bwahahahaha
Originally posted by Adevoc Satanae
Originally posted by Agit8dChop
Muslims would never let the west build a Haliburton office in Central baghdad... so why should we let them build a mosque at ground zero.
there' needs to be some cultural sensitivity .
We are supposed to be better than baghdada, no?
For that matter, how do you equate a company that poisons and abuses our soldiers in the name of profit to a house of worship? Do you worship Haliburton? What do you like best about them? Stealing our tax dollars to drive empty trucks or stealing our tax dollars to short the soldiers what they need?
got any proof of that cameltoe?
links maybe?
or just some..hey wait a minute! you getting paid for this sewage you spouting?
Why do you all keep with this argument?
This is what you are saying-
"We are America and we are better than you, unless it comes to some standard of something that irritates us, then we want to lower ourselves to your standards until you get better."
See if you can run a competitive business that way and tell me how that works out.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by neo96
Exactly. What they fail to admit is that to a muslim, the religion is the law. A mosque is much more than a simple place to worship.
Again, EXPLAIN WHY MY MUSLIM FRIENDS DO NOT TRY TO KILL ME AS AN INFIDEL!!!!!!
what is the problem with this question? It applies directly to your logic.
Look at Britain. I had a Brit tell me recently that the US is only a few years away from what has happened to the UK.
Of course. Who would have more insight into the intricate inner workings of the United States and how law are being rewritten in secret to appease this one mosque than some brit you talked to.
]Neighbor's dog tell you anything too?