It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by LadySkadi
I think people actually might not know how to make a difference. There are ways to both understand and help without rushing to judging or making moves that you think are helping that might in fact be making things worse for the very people you're trying to help. The first thing you have to do if see if they're even willing to accept help. And, if so, what kind.
[edit on 8/1/2010 by ~Lucidity]
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
Those who blame "religion" for this might also be discounting cultural factors and just plain insanity. It's not as if abuse of women is limited to a particular religion. It happens everyday all over the world. Even in the good ole USA.
Originally posted by LostNemesis
I am female.
I feel that whether or not I support how they treat women in the middle east, it is NOT our place, or anyones' to be policing the world. I am sure we have practices that people in other countries don't approve of.
It's just not our place to tell people on the other side of the world how to live.
Originally posted by dreamwalker74
reply to post by ~Lucidity
Never once supported war to solve this, and am still outraged by the lack of female retaliation in defence of other women. Especially in the countries where we have free speach. Such as the U.S.A.
Originally posted by sweetliberty
I believe the OP is suggesting we women stop long enough to walk into the shoes of the oppressed.
I don't believe he is talking about women who "choose" to live their, but how they are treated and I feel the same mentality and culture exists with them when they are on our soil.
I do not think all are of that mindset but many are.
I believe if we walked a mile in the shoes of the oppressed, we would take more into consideration before taking a stand.
"People didn't go hungry in those days in Iraq," Quandt said. "Saddam improved the school system in Iraq and literacy for women was phenomenal for that of an Arab country at the time."
In a 2001 interview, Aburish discussed the support for the dictator with PBS's Frontline.
"We knew Saddam was tough. But the balance was completely different then. He was also delivering. The Iraqi people were getting a great deal of things that they needed and wanted and he was popular."
The revolution was populist, nationalist and later Shi'a Islamic. It was in part a conservative backlash against the Westernizing and secularizing efforts of the Western-backed Shah,[18] and not-so-conservative reaction to social injustice and other shortcomings of the ancien régime.[19] The Shah was perceived by many as beholden to — if not a puppet of — a non-Muslim Western power (the United States)[20][21] whose culture was contaminating that of Iran.