It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Congress shall make no lawrespecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
It is unlawful to parade, stand, or move in processions or assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds, or to display in the Building and grounds a flag, banner, or device designed or adapted to bring into public notice a party, organization, or movement. Read more: vlex.com...
Wonder how different the responses in this topic would be if instead of Christians this was Muslims who got told they couldn't pray there.
I will give you that people have the right to worship as they please, that is in fact the 1st Amendment. I completely agree with that.
However, I doubt that that freedom covers the attempted brainwashing of unsuspecting passers by.
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
Wonder how different the responses in this topic would be if instead of Christians this was Muslims who got told they couldn't pray there.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
?????
ATS is not usually so gullible?
The law states "It is unlawful to parade, stand, or move in processions or
assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds"
Originally posted by ~Lucidity
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Yes you have. And perhaps they may have challenged it. Or perhaps the thread would have just drawn different people.
I'm still wondering if this was more of an issue with assembly without a permit issue though.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
I will give you that people have the right to worship as they please, that is in fact the 1st Amendment. I completely agree with that.
However, I doubt that that freedom covers the attempted brainwashing of unsuspecting passers by.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
people do not need to seek permission to do what they have a right to do.
[edit on 17-7-2010 by Jean Paul Zodeaux]
It may be constitutionally contentious with may friend JPZ, but I think gay folks should be wed if they please and be afforded the same legal regards as a man and women.
I still think it's a dangerous game to have cult members preforming brainwashing rites on the steps of the SC.
and the only people that would require a license for marriage are brothers and sisters, or mother and child. Something real sick like that.
Could this group have done or said something in manner that would warrant dispersal, interference in your eyes,
Is there a point when you subjective self would cancel out your objective nature JPZ?
A building that is officious in nature, intended to perform and function-
Could JPZ the cop be compelled to use "authority"?