It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Police say prayer illegal on U.S. Supreme Court grounds
The Alliance Defense Fund sent a letter to U.S. Supreme Court officials Thursday that urges them to stop their police officers from prohibiting people from quietly praying outside the court building. Christian teacher Maureen Rigo, her students, and a few adults were told by a court police officer that they must stop praying there because it was against the law.
“Christians shouldn’t be silenced for exercising their beliefs through quiet prayer on public property,” said ADF Senior Counsel Nate Kellum. “The last place you’d expect this kind of obvious disregard for the First Amendment would be on the grounds of the U.S. Supreme Court itself, but that’s what happened.”
On May 5, Rigo, a teacher at Wickenburg Christian Academy in Arizona, along with her students and a few adults, were taking an educational tour of the Supreme Court complex. After arriving at the Oval Plaza, they stood off to the side at the bottom of the steps, bowed their heads, and quietly prayed amongst themselves to God.
Even though they were not obstructing traffic, not demonstrating, and praying quietly in a conversational tone so as to not attract attention, a court police officer approached the group and told them to stop praying in that public area immediately. The prayer was stopped based on a statute, 40 U.S.C. §6135, which bars parades and processions on Supreme Court grounds.
“Mrs. Rigo was not engaging in a parade, procession, or assembly. She was speaking in a conversational level to those around her with her head bowed,” the ADF letter to court officials explains. “There is no reason to silence Mrs. Rigo’s activities since these activities do not attract attention, create a crowd, or give off the appearance of impartiality. The ban on public prayers cannot hope to survive First Amendment scrutiny.”
Read more: Alliance Defence Fund
40 USC Sec. 6135 01/05/2009
-EXPCITE-
TITLE 40 - PUBLIC BUILDINGS, PROPERTY, AND WORKS
SUBTITLE II - PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND WORKS
PART C - FEDERAL BUILDING COMPLEXES
CHAPTER 61 - UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT BUILDING AND GROUNDS
SUBCHAPTER IV - PROHIBITIONS AND PENALTIES
-HEAD-
Sec. 6135. Parades, assemblages, and display of flags in the
Supreme Court Building and grounds
-STATUTE-
It is unlawful to parade, stand, or move in processions or
assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds, or to display
in the Building and grounds a flag, banner, or device designed or
adapted to bring into public notice a party, organization, or
movement.
US Code
Originally posted by getreadyalready
?????
ATS is not usually so gullible?
The law states "It is unlawful to parade, stand, or move in processions or
assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds"
It says nothing about prayer. In other words this same group could have stopped to have a group sandwich and the guard would still have hustled them along.
Turn waste office paper into toilet paper
While many environmentalists hope that we can eventually have a paperless office, one company in Japan has developed a machine that shreds paper and then converts the waste into readily usable toilet paper.
The process requires you to add water, and it requires about 30 minutes to thin out the paper and generate one roll of toilet paper. This 'TP' looks far from snuggly soft, but it's undeniably a significant step towards a greener office space. The entire process is automated, so it's definitely a big convenience.
The 'White Goat' as it's called is not a contraption that you're likely to squeeze under your desk however. It's mammoth size (1.8m tall and 600kg) would definitely be a better fit in your server room if you have one.
Gizmag
Originally posted by airspoon
Our first Amendment was subverted a long time ago. I would say all the way back when the government started to force us to get permission from them to assemble. So, in affect we had to ask the very system to assemble against them.
Originally posted by airspoon
Then, our 1st Amendment took another blow when our children were prevented from practicing their religion at school. Another blow came when corporations and mega-conglomerates started dominating our press. The final nail in the coffin? The Patriot Act and HGTPA (along with many other pieces of legislation), where you can land in a secret prison somewhere for speaking your mind, or speaking against the very agenda that is taking our liberties away.
Originally posted by airspoon
I would say that the 1st Amendment, along with most of our Constitution has been rendered useless a long time ago.
--airspoon
Well too bad they were not arrested and charged for it, because I'd love to see this one go up the appeals process and hear what the people inside the US Supreme Court have to say on the issue.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
?????
ATS is not usually so gullible?
The law states "It is unlawful to parade, stand, or move in processions or
assemblages in the Supreme Court Building or grounds"
It says nothing about prayer. In other words this same group could have stopped to have a group sandwich and the guard would still have hustled them along.
Come on folks. Don't let these religious articles get you in a tizzy. People love to pick out a tiny thing, call it something else that vaguely resembles it, and put it in the hands of a radical that will shout it from the rooftops.
It is perfectly legal to "pray" anywhere you want. You just can't do it in a large obstructive group. You also cannot assemble a large obstructive group to hear a lecture on paper airplane folding.
This isn't about any religious article.. it's about protecting the rights given to us by the U.S Constitution.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.