It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by dubiousone
Originally posted by hooper
reply to post by TiffanyInLA
Well, of course I can not speak for my "Tricky" friend but I can say, again, thanks for your opinion!
By the way, if I tell them I know you can I get a little discount on the evidence that the United States government conspired to commit 3000 acts of first degree murder of its own citizens? $15.95 is a little steep for a DVD!
Is that a failed attempt at humor or did you just prove beyond any doubt that you have nothing worth hearing to say on this thread?
Originally posted by Snarf
so if it's not a rocket, it's thermite
if it's not thermite, it's a hologram
if it's not a hologram, it's a radio controlled airplane
if it's not that, then we call into question the speed of the aircraft?
You people never give up, do you?
No matter how many times you're proven wrong...you just keep on going.
Originally posted by hdutton
I frankly find it amazing how "the official story" continues to fall apart as more and more logic is applied to the evidence.
I know there are "safe operating limits" in place for these craft. That does not mean these limits can't be exceeded, it simply means not many sane people would push beyond them.
However, just what are the operating limits of a human beings while preforming some of the manuevers done that day. Even trained pilots have trouble with "G" forces within the range which these planes experienced.
I can't figure out how a person can fly a plane while their eyeballs bounce around in their heads or after they black out.
Originally posted by hooper
Oh, and by the way, on the little homemade diagram you posted the redzone is labeled "structural failure" and on the little diagrams you just linked to the redzones are labeled "structural damage or failure". Care to comment on that edit?
Originally posted by hooper
First, I am just asking questions. Second, no humor. This whole thread is basically spam to move traffic over to another webiste and sell DVD's. Why do you think the OP keeps linking to the website when it would be just as easy and clearer to just cut and paste the material?
Originally posted by TiffanyInLA
Are you willing to put your name to your above claims as did Deets, Aimer and Kolstad?
It appears it is you trebor, who is trying to sell snake-oil.
A court may dismiss a claim as "factually frivolous" if the facts alleged are "clearly baseless", that is, "fanciful", fantastic" or "delusional" Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992) (quoting Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319,325,327,328 (1989)) Courts have not hesitated to dismiss complaints asserting delusional claims of conspiracy.3 Indeed, courts have dismissed other cases alleging delusional conspiracy theories about the attacks of September 11,2001. Because Gallop's claims are factually baseless -- indeed, because they are fanciful, fantastic, and delusional -- they are dismissed.
Originally posted by Mobius1974
Tiffany,
I am going to make a bunch of assumptions.... First one is.. I assume I am right in my assumptions.
You know way to much about this subject.
You are not a new member here.. Just a new name!
You are not a woman! (Nice pic... makes me want to agree with you)
You are not leaving any of this open for debate.. You came in here with your mind made up.
You didnt post this article for debate.. You were trolling( In the fishing sense of the word)
You were waiting for a few to disagree...and already had this arsenal of "facts".
This entire thread was a set up... you already caught a few fish, that are all excited now!
Good luck in your fishing expedition!
But as usual, I need to repeat myself.
Originally posted by trebor451
Originally posted by TiffanyInLA
Are you willing to put your name to your above claims as did Deets, Aimer and Kolstad?
It appears it is you trebor, who is trying to sell snake-oil.
Fine. Take your "experts" and go to court. Wait...you already tried that and it was thrown out, I believe, before anyone could even burp:
Isn't it counter productive to post free streaming video if you're trying to sell the DVD?