It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Investigators: Obama using Connecticut Soc. Sec. Number!!

page: 11
70
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 13 2010 @ 08:34 PM
link   
reply to post by anon72
 


Sweet dreams OP:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/1dc4dd83a2dc.jpg[/atsimg]



posted on May, 13 2010 @ 08:36 PM
link   
I wonder who had to die in Connecticut so Obama could get his SSN?



posted on May, 13 2010 @ 09:04 PM
link   
Wasn't the point of getting a Social Security card and paying Social Security taxes all these years was so we could have retirement benefits? This is why we have "one" SS#.

Every time I've married, divorced or whatever... my name changed, job changed, state changed, it didn't matter because they could track me to "one" Social Security number.

Well, we have known for at least 10 years, there isn't any future retirement benefits. So it really doesn't matter if Obama has one or fifty Social Security numbers, as long as he paid the SS taxes for each job he had.

So why would anyone trick the Social Security office and apply for so many? Obviously he didn't want to be tracked.

Or maybe when he joined college.... for initiation.... the freshmen had to get as many SS#'s as they could to be accepted!

I really like the CIA theory though.



posted on May, 13 2010 @ 09:06 PM
link   
reply to post by jibeho
 



Originally posted by jibeho
Wasn’t Obama the guy who proclaimed, “Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency,” in welcoming remarks to his cabinet and senior staff just one day after he took the oath of office?


Today when I read the above quote it seemed eerily familiar, and then I remembered:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/fefa780b39e1.png[/atsimg]
Source

Stealing quotes now jibe? ATS has rules about plagiarism and quote attribution.

I will add to list. Sad, really quite sad.



[edit on 13-5-2010 by kinda kurious]



posted on May, 13 2010 @ 09:10 PM
link   
reply to post by TheImmaculateD1
 


The first 3 digits of the social security number are determined by what state/region you received your SSN in. Used to be a great parlor trick when I was preparing taxes - I could tell out of staters what region they came from based on those 3 digits. It's 0s and 1s on the east coast, 3XX in Michigan, 5s and 6s in Ca. I used to have a map of the others.



posted on May, 13 2010 @ 09:15 PM
link   
Christian Science Monitor (neutral enough source?) refers to SSN# claim as "internet rumor."


The birthers are instead turning to another claim against Obama’s legitimacy: an Internet rumor that questions the Obama social security number.


www.csmonitor.com...


[edit on 13-5-2010 by kinda kurious]



posted on May, 13 2010 @ 09:18 PM
link   

Originally posted by kinda kurious
reply to post by jibeho
 



Originally posted by jibeho
Wasn’t Obama the guy who proclaimed, “Transparency and the rule of law will be the touchstones of this presidency,” in welcoming remarks to his cabinet and senior staff just one day after he took the oath of office?


Today when I read the above quote it seemed eerily familiar, and then I remembered:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/fefa780b39e1.png[/atsimg]
Source

Stealing quotes now jibe? ATS has rules about plagiarism and quote attribution.

I will add to list. Sad, really quite sad.



[edit on 13-5-2010 by kinda kurious]


Oops! human error. Happens all the time. Keeping up with you in multiple threads made me forget to to use my little quote thingy. I'll take a mulligan on this one. Seems to work for everyone else including Obama and Michelle.

No plagiarism. Just a data entry error due to the juxtaposition of my keys.



posted on May, 13 2010 @ 09:30 PM
link   
reply to post by jibeho
 


Weak sauce excuse. PWND! What Joe Wilson said.


Must have been too busy hopping around doing hand stands, then POW!


[edit on 13-5-2010 by kinda kurious]



posted on May, 13 2010 @ 09:34 PM
link   
reply to post by kinda kurious
 


I wish my intentions were as nefarious as you would hope. Simple multitasking error.

I went back and clarified the post with an edit to give you full credit of course. I'm good at that. I understand that I am also a great liar.



posted on May, 13 2010 @ 10:53 PM
link   
I was born in Connecticut. My SSN# starts with 047. I was born in 1984

[edit on 13-5-2010 by SneakAPeek]



posted on May, 13 2010 @ 11:35 PM
link   
May I ask something?

If this is SUCH big news, why is it then featured mainly on WND, a site that HATES Obama? If this was huge, why isn't Fox News running it, who many on this website claim is not apart of the MSM?

Why is it only fringe websites that support this story?



posted on May, 13 2010 @ 11:35 PM
link   
Ok a conservative here battling stupidty across the birther board. All children don't recieve or haven't always recieved a SSN at birth. Obama recieved his at 17. Why at 17? Needed it for college. Was living in Indonesia at the time. Probably took a college visit, inquired which ssn office gave the fastest issuance and sent it to the connn office. You don't have to apply for a ssn in the state of your birth, you can send it to any one of the issuance offices.

The PI is a PI because he isn't smart enough to work for the FBI.

Let this birther crap go. Thisguy is screwing up the country bad enough without fabricating things about him.



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 12:23 AM
link   
LOL I am still in shock people still follow Obama even after all this BS going on. he still hasn't fixed the economy. I personally find this fishy. I don't care who you are if you were born in the state , then you should receive the SSN from that state. People are strange.



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 12:57 AM
link   
I think that your expert investigators should check again. Connecticut has zip codes beginning with 06xxx. The only 04xxx zip codes are in Maine according to the USPS. I suspect that, in addition to getting the state wrong by a considerable margin, I would question whether they actually know Obama's SSN.

Before 1973 (when Obama turned 12), SSNs started with a three-digit number that indicated the state it was issued in which, as the official Social Security website points out, doesn't have to be your state of residence. Beginning in 1973, all SSNs were issued from the Social Security Baltimore office, and consisted of the first three digits of the zip code on the mailing address on the application - and still don't have to be the state of residence.

Before the changeover, when Obama was a pre-teen, the numbers for cards issued by regional offices in Connecticut were 040 to 049. It is highly unlikely that Obama applied to a Connecticut office or any other office when he was 11 or younger. Before Obama, who was born in August of 1961, turned 12, the numbers for Connecticut became zip code numbers - which begin with 06. The zip codes starting with 04 are, as I pointed out above, in Maine.

So, it looks like the entire story is nothing but a blivet (100 pounds of steaming cow manure stuffed into a 50 pound sack).



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 01:13 AM
link   
reply to post by dragnet53
 


Supply-siders and laissez-fairytale free-market zealots have been undermining the economy for 30 years, leading to the second worst economic collapse in our history. And, since Obama replaced Bush, Republicans have been using every trick fair or foul to force the Democrats to water down their efforts to repair the economy so that they can label Obama and the Dems a failure in the 2010 and 2012 elections. They don't care how much damage the GOP is doing to the recovery as long as it undermines Democrats at the polls. Actually, the recovery (and we are recovering) is progressing faster than I would have predicted a year ago (note: I have been consulting to major banks and financial houses on Wall Street for decades, including designing software algorithms for quant modeling as well as risk assessment and valuation of MBS, CMBS, CDO and other complex derivatives, so I'm not quite as economically illiterate as 99% of my fellow citizens). Just how much did you complain, dragnet53, for the 8 years that Bush and his sockpuppet Congress were helping Wall Street push the economy over the cliff? And, now, you blame Obama for not producing a miracle?

Its as if Bush pushed a guy off the top of the Empire State Building, and Obama came into office when he was plummeting past the tenth story. The real miracle is that the guy never hit the ground, but started to rise back up a dozen floors in the last year. I'm not a fan of Obama by any means. I don't like leaders who let political pragmatism trump principals. But, in this case, he has managed at least to save the economy from total collapse and even reverse its course with the entire Republican Party and the Blue Dog Democrats trying to sabotage his efforts.



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 02:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Bad Wolf
So, it looks like the entire story is nothing but a blivet (100 pounds of steaming cow manure stuffed into a 50 pound sack).


First I want to say that I basically agree with you on this. But that said,:


Beginning in 1973, all SSNs were issued from the Social Security Baltimore office, and consisted of the first three digits of the zip code on the mailing address on the application - and still don't have to be the state of residence.


My SSN, which I got in the mid-1970's while living in Connecticut, begins with 04. Despite the fact that the zip code I was living in began 06.

I think the way it works is that the first three digits of the SSN were assigned to specific zip codes, but not identical to those zip codes.



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 02:56 AM
link   
"If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for a reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed."

-Albert Einstein

The Declaration of Independence states that in any incident that a seemingly unconstitutional law is passed that does infringe our rights that in that incident we shall overthrow the government and reestablish a newer, more efficient one. Often we go about our lives suspecting that our constitutional rights are fair and just and have not infringed anything in our lives unfairly, however, this is incorrect. For although your life might not be affected by the certain unjust principle in our laws, it does not, however, mean that it isn’t infringing the natural rights of others.

In the bill of rights it states that: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

Many people have told me things along the line of, "Your going to get yourself into trouble, your going to get people killed." Well in that case, the exercise to freedom of speech, and the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances, would all be trampled upon.

Why do we not exercise our right to show the will and power of the people. The government has and will continue to over extend their boundaries. We have the ability to alter or abolish as we please.

Within the 14th amendment, it states the following: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

Such infringements upon the 14th amendment are condoned in the Patriot Act which allows for the POSSIBILITY of torture, and the illegal wiretapping of American citizens.

This cannot be allowed to persist. I have started an initiative on this concept. You can search for the facebook group True Patriots of America. Together we can make history and fundamentally change the world as we know it.


[edit on 14-5-2010 by hedlesbill]



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 03:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by hedlesbill

Such infringements upon the 14th amendment are condoned in the Patriot Act which allows for the POSSIBILITY of torture, and the illegal wiretapping of American citizens.

This cannot be allowed to persist. I have started an initiative on this concept. You can search for the facebook group True Patriots of America. Together we can make history and fundamentally change the world as we know it.


[edit on 14-5-2010 by hedlesbill]


What is this "Patriot Act" you speak of and when did Obama first set it in motion?

Just curious, given the thread subject and all.



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 04:16 AM
link   
OMG!
I was born in Idaho and have a Mississippi social security number!
Please, remind me never to run for President, as this must mean I was born in Kenya, moved to Idaho, and then Mississippi!

Good Gods, can we find nothing better to discuss than the same old tired BS arguments?
Really, seriously...
If there was any "there" there, don't you think Hillary would have loved to trounce him with this in the primaries?
Come on, people... Think for yourselves.



posted on May, 14 2010 @ 04:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by wonkamaniac
OMG!
I was born in Idaho and have a Mississippi social security number!
Please, remind me never to run for President, as this must mean I was born in Kenya, moved to Idaho, and then Mississippi!

Nuh, we will give you the benefit of the doubt. Unless you can produce video of your wife saying you are Kenyan and that Kenya is your home country. Also it would be more convincing if you changed your name a few times, didn't release your birth certificate AND suppressed documents showing that you received aid as a foreign student despite being born in the USA.


Good Gods, can we find nothing better to discuss than the same old tired BS arguments?
Really, seriously...
If there was any "there" there, don't you think Hillary would have loved to trounce him with this in the primaries?
Come on, people... Think for yourselves.

How could she when he has been presented, groomed, funded and marketed by TPTB? Do you think it would be wise to press this kind of information about somebody with such connections? Do you find it strange that a virtual unknown 5 years ago was able to become the Commander in Chief of one of the most powerful armies on Earth? Where did he come from? Why is so little known about his history?

[edit on 14/5/2010 by Dark Ghost]




top topics



 
70
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join