It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by rufusdrak
1. someone mentioned some people heard explosions
2. some saw fuel leaking out of the plane
3. some saw the plane turned perilously sideways with its wingtip pointing towards the ground
4. some said there was a 16 minute communications blackout.
where did people get all this stuff from? This sounds like 911 and all those testimonies that were quickly covered up afterwards.
Originally posted by rufusdrak
1. someone mentioned some people heard explosions
Originally posted by rufusdrak
2. some saw fuel leaking out of the plane
Originally posted by rufusdrak
3. some saw the plane turned perilously sideways with its wingtip pointing towards the ground
Originally posted by rufusdrak
4. some said there was a 16 minute communications blackout.
where did people get all this stuff from?
Originally posted by savvys84
reply to post by harrytuttle
Very fishy indeed. Im a Pilot.The TU 154 can lan automatically in zero vis. So fog is no issue. The pilot insisted on landing there, after being warned is also fishy.
16 mins of comm failure b4 crash hmmm.
Fuel leaking from plane. Poppycock. The TU 154 lands at 150 kts approach speed and fuel leaking will vaporise and you wont see jack of fuel.
Originally posted by jumpingbeanz
to take such a risk wit all those people on board does not make any sense watsoever
Originally posted by BobAthome
reply to post by savvys84
Beautifull,, fog ya right never thought of the possibility that "fog" would would have Zero effect.
It's so nice when real people remind us that "we" can only speculate "they" KNOW.
Originally posted by rufusdrak
something just doesn't make sense to me. Now I'm no avionics expert but, when a plane is landing isn't it already pretty much slowed down with flaps and all to such a degree that:
1. if it crashes, the speed is not great enough to always kill everyone on board..a landing crash often has many if not all survivors
2. speed is definitely not great enough for the entire plane to completely disintegrate and have pieces strewn everywhere.
The type of crash they're describing and the look of the area seems like the plane blew up many miles in the air going very fast rather than a landing at which point the plane is already going pretty slowly
Originally posted by rufusdrak
try educating yourself sometime. It makes wonders. Modern planes have no problem with fog, in fact you can land a modern plane without even having windows in it so fog isn't exactly a killer. The instruments would have allowed him to land.
Originally posted by Vitchilo
reply to post by spearhead
Yes that may be a possibility but since he's really pro-NATO, kinda hates Russia and accepted CIA torture camps in the first place, he's considered ``part of the elite`` IMO so he wouldn't be killed by the US at least.