reply to post by DjSharperimage
My earlier post was an immediate reaction. Now I've watched the video and read the OP.
I'll begin with a few comments about the latter.
First, what do Avlon's CV and the antecedents of his wife have to do with the issue? And what is so sinister about them, anyway? He is a political
centrist, a moderate, in other words, who believes that extremes of both left and right are foolish and dangerous. This is a perfectly valid
ideological position--it is what the Greeks called the Golden Mean: 'nothing to excess'. It happens to be my own position, more or less, though I
tend to be a bit to right of centre in economic terms, and left of centre in social ones.
Obviously he is politically engaged, has been for years, and is connected to a political family. Since when have these attributes been crimes, or even
indictments?
They are not, except in the mind of one kind of person:
a conspiracy theorist. Someone whose connexion with reality is so twisted that he or
she has come to see a simple middle-of-the-road position as somehow wicked or wrong.
*
Now to the video itself.
I agree heartily with what the commentator says. Distance lends perspective by making trends more easily visible, and from my perspective, several
thousand miles distant from the USA, it is all too clear that a wave of conspiracist hyteria is washing over the country, sweeping ordinary people
along with it as public discourse is hijacked by ranting, hate-filled anti-authoritarian conspiracy theorists. On ATS, one is ideally positioned to
see it happening--both the mentally unbalanced conspiracy 'thought leaders' and the hysteria victims they make out of ordinary, usually quite normal
people are strongly represented among the site membership.
*
Paranoia and hysteria have always been well represented on the extreme right of American politics, but they have never dominated mainstream discourse
in quite the way they now do. I think there are three reasons for this.
- First, American society has (not for the first time in history) reached a point where massive intervention by the state is necessary in
order to keep the country on the rails--the laissez-faire approach so beloved of Americans is not working. Thus the state has recently obliged
to impose significant restrictions on citizens' privacy and freedom of movement to protect them against terrorism (even though the 'war against
terrorism' is, itself, something of a overreaction necessary to placate terrified, hysterical voters); it has been obliged to intervene massively in
the economy in order to stabilize it; and it will soon be obliged to intervene on an equally huge scale to avert the catastrophic environmental
consequences of overconsumption, in particular, climate change.
These huge interventions have understandably caused great resentment, even among ordinary, well-adjusted people. For mentally unstable political
naifs, however, they are evidence of a massive conspiracy by the government, or some shadowy force behind the government, to take away from patriotic
Americans their freedoms (and their precious guns). This resentment--which is, at bottom, resentment at being forced to become a bit more like the
rest of the world in order to survive when you are no longer the dominant force in it--is the first of the three causes I mentioned earlier.
- The second of these causes is the internet. Conspiracy theorists are, or were, rare and marginal in any real-world community, their mad ideas given
short shrift by the majority of levelheaded, normal citizens. But the internet clusters like-minded conspiracy theorists in a nongeographical way,
giving them and their theories a visibility and apparent importance they would not otherwise have. ATS itself is an example of how this works. The
internet allows conspiracy theorists to exchange ideas, helping them refine their delusions through consensual convergence. This makes the theories
more persuasive to ordinary people ripe for hysterical upsweep. And of course, the internet allows conspiracy theorists to organize--to whatever
degree these inveterate, antisocial loners are capable of organizing at all.
- Finally, there is the immediate, precipitating circumstance: a black man in the White House. This, sadly, appears to be more than many white
Americans can stand; it honestly seems to be driving large numbers of them over the edge.
Given this historical conjunction of factors, something like the present epidemic of conspiracist hysteria was probably inevitable.
*
America's historical decline, which began in the 1990s, deserves to be long and slow, as decorous and magnificent in its way as Rome's. The antics
of paranoid conspiracists, however, seem to threaten a catastrophic implosion in which the country destroys itself in a paroxysm of self-hating,
hysterical violence--America running amok, gashing and maiming itself. A terrifying thought, since it is quite likely to take a big chunk of the rest
of the world along with it.
But I remain hopeful. Most Americans are, I believe, wholesome, sensible people. And the internet, though something of a rogue technology at the
moment, will surely be better understood as time goes on, enabling us to see apparently salient fringe ideas and groups in their true perspective.
Good sense will prevail, as it has always done in the past; American democracy and cultural heterogeniety will ensure it. At any rate, let us hope
so.
*
Yes, this post is intended to provoke. It is intended to provoke thought. If it does that among a few thoughtful ATS members, I shall be satisfied. If
it provokes reasoned and thoughtful argument, I shall be more than satisfied; I shall be delighted. It will, of course, provoke more or less abusive
rebuttals from the many hysterical, mentally unstable conspiracy theorists among the membership. I shall not care about them, nor shall I respond to
their ravings.