posted on Feb, 26 2010 @ 06:57 PM
Actually I think this tread is excellent.
It is an excellent example of what is going on in the conspiracy-truther movements and so it should be put under psychology for that matter. There
seems to be an overflow of information and disinformation on all sorts of theories in such a way that even if the "truth" on a conspiracytheory will
be put on the net it wouldn't be recognized as truth.
We would still get the same reactions, some say; Hey that is just how I see it, others would say this is BS, throw it away please.So if there would be
a conspiracy by a group.... let me tell you, they won! The truthermovement will not be pleased by the truth, just because it hyped and there are too
many engaged with the truth and formed their own views.
The US government claims to be willing to stop those movements while they only need to sit back and enjoy the show. The conspiracytheorist will kill
themselves by not trusting, and they are right, their fellowmembers.
I allready put this up a little time ago.. It is just a process of mankind. You can only kill conspiracies with conspiracies. We can not do that much
about it if we want to be free in thinking and forming our own theories. We could have done something before it got a hype. Hypes kill the true nature
of ideas, theories and developments, some for the best some for the worst.
Ok maybe this tread is an reaction to the NZ-australiatread but who cares?? Nowadays sites like this are filled with BS, if you don't see that...
Well I love to be you, blessed are the ignorant. You just have to make a choice,are you willing to put your years of theory forming aside because
someone else shows you the truth? Are you in a state to recognize it as such? Or are you trying to make your side the truth, and is everything that is
usefull, true-info or dis-info just a tool to win in an argument, to make it true?
I know I'm not on the Topic of the OP, but I sure am on topic, just read between the lines of all treads. It becomes clear. I just wonder what some
of ATS guru's think about this, we allready know that their followers will believe, them!
I totally agree to put BS in BTS, butwho decides what is BS, if we would vote, like in democracy we would not get it right. Only the people envolved
could do that, if and only if they have the overview of the total truth AND are willing to put their opinions aside to explain the overview of the
truth. Even if they are I am not convinced that the consious of man is developed enough to grasp that.
So you tell me what is actually not BS?
(I totally accept some good one liners after this, followed by "second line