The Gay Agenda -- You Can't Be Serious?

reply to post by bsbray11


Sorry, but you misunderstood. My fault for not being clear perhaps. I wanted to show that the whole idea is wrong from a natural, biological standpoint. But I must admit it took me over 50 years to realize it. And I will admit, because of my upbringing I am not comfortable with it, but more understanding.

Originally posted by concernedcitizan
reply to post by Blaine91555

 

It's been a very slow news week. Beats the reptilian threads.

I guess you have a point there. Of course the fact the Summit that determines 16% of our economy and could destroy our economy even further could be argued to be important?

Most of us could give a crap less if a person is Gay or Straight. I don't even want to know, nor do I care if a person is Gay or Straight. Why do people run around talking about their sexual orientation all the time anyway? Attention I suppose?

Perhaps there is a market for T-shirts advertising peoples sexual orientation and preferences. Maybe; "Hi, I'm Into Oral, Do You Swallow Or Spit?"

I know, I know, go wash my mouth out with soap

Mod's, I have an excuse. I've got a cold and I'm on Nyquil and as soon as I get home, 20 year old Single Malt neat.

Originally posted by Wyn Hawks

Originally posted by Blaine91555
Enough of the Gay crap already. We want our board back!!!!!!!!!!

...bear is edible...

That's a two year old Kodiak playing in a river with his brother in the avatar. It's only about four hundred pounds. I however am fully grown and heavily armed.

Originally posted by OrphenFire

Originally posted by Annee

Originally posted by OrphenFire
reply to post by undo

 

Evolutionarily speaking, homosexuality would be less-than-desirable in our gene pool at that time.

Are you saying gays are incapable of reproducing?

Attraction to same sex - - does not mean their sexual organs don't work.

No. Obviously (?) I'm not stupid enough to suggest that homosexuality somehow magically destroys the reproductive properties of sexual organs. I am suggesting that homosexuals would likely not survive in a completely survival-based world. Sure there are burly bear men who are gay, but most gays I know are those effeminate types that act girlier than valley girls lol. They wouldn't be as likely to survive a harsh hunter-gatherer wasteland like prehistoric humans. Plus, there would be idiots who would kill them just because they can.

OK - your explanation is actually what I thought you meant - - not what I questioned.

But - you are stereotyping. We all recognize very feminine men - - because they are obvious and stand out.

They hardly represent the entire gay population. I would actually venture to state - - most gays go unnoticed.

I don't have any problems with gay people. But one thing i am concerned about is that, if gay marriage and all that becomes legal....then there would be increased number of children turning into gays.

reply to post by Benevolent Heretic


Chill out BH. That was an obvious joke. I did not mean to offend anyone.

It was in reference to the dueling threads going on.

Sexual orientation is nobody's business but the individuals. You have never seen me argue otherwise.

Originally posted by Ufokrazy
I don't have any problems with gay people. But one thing i am concerned about is that, if gay marriage and all that becomes legal....then there would be increased number of children turning into gays.

How do you figure?

Canadians have had legal same sex marriage for years now, and there is no more "increase" in gay couples.

Gay has become a non issue in Canada now that the government keeps their nose of out people's business when it comes to marriage and the equal law of citizens.

If anything it's made for LESS influence of gay's on our country simply because they are treated more like everybody else and have the same opportunities.

That's all were asking for.

People don't complain and make a fuss when things are fair.

~Keeper

Originally posted by Blaine91555
That was an obvious joke. I did not mean to offend anyone.

Apparently it wasn't so obvious. Sorry, I thought you were serious.

You have never seen me argue otherwise.

No, I haven't.

Originally posted by Ufokrazy
I don't have any problems with gay people. But one thing i am concerned about is that, if gay marriage and all that becomes legal....then there would be increased number of children turning into gays.

That's a knee-slapper! See, Blaine, your joke should have been as obvious as this one! Hilarious! Thanks for the laugh!

Originally posted by concernedcitizan
reply to post by craig732

 

It's up to the parents to hand out that condom.

NO - its not.

Real information needs to be available and provided for ALL adolescents.

We don't need to play a guessing game on which parent will take on this responsibility and which will choose denial.

Originally posted by Ratkiller
reply to post by bsbray11

 

I wanted to show that the whole idea is wrong from a natural, biological standpoint.

You could say redheads are biologically wrong.

There are many biological birth "differences".

reply to post by tothetenthpower


hey guys just cause you are afraid of a big man in the sky who thinks gays are bad dosent mean you have to attack them and hate them they are just like us and have feelings too i have many gay friends they are all inteligent and kind people so leave em alone and pick on me instead im an evil communist

Originally posted by Bigwhammy
You all can pretend he's wearing a fine suit all you want but you know its a lie. The emperor has no clothes. To write and answer explaining the birds and bees would be to dignify your absurdness. The evidence is obvious to everyone. You really aren't even being sincere by asking. This is the agenda at work "Let's all pretend its normal. and feign incredulity at the opposition" Its not and you know its not.

there were faiths, religions, before christianity.

Originally posted by Emerald The Paradigm
The people who don't think there's a Gay Agenda are NOT seeing the bigger picture.

They are thinking "Oh my neighbor is gay and he is nice, so gay people can be nice."

It's NOT about small crap like that.

It's about degrading society as a whole to create a massive gender confused populace that will subvert to MORE CONTROL.

Regardless of how you want to look at it being gay is not normal and it will never be unless you bought into the propaganda.

[edit on 25-2-2010 by Emerald The Paradigm]

im willing to bet you couldnt define 'normal' if i asked you to.

define normal please

reply to post by Watcher-In-The-Shadows


I am still reading through the all the pages written since last night but I had to stop at this post, laugh, clap and star ...

You gotta love Kaku.

Thanks for that Watcher

Originally posted by leo123

Originally posted by tothetenthpower
I'm a gay male, married, have children.

Now how screwed up and incredibly selfish is that.

Quite clearly you couldn't give a rats ass about by being gay and having a wife and children. You had no business getting married or having children in the first place knowing that as they all will clearly and unfortunately carry the burden of your unfortunate decision to include them in their lives.

Shame on you - I hope you rot in hell for the pain you clearly will bring upon your wife and children.

You are a very selfish soul.

Again, I hope you rot in hell for what you have done to those close to you.

[edit on 25-2-2010 by leo123]

wow...

he is married to a MAN.

and is probably a better stand-up parent and Samaritan than you could ever hope to be

PS, my mom is a lawyer. why do you want to shoot her?

Originally posted by Niccawhois

all the gays that I know ( and trust me, I know a lot ) none of them want to bother you with their homosexuality.

I'm bothered by gay pride parades where men in ass-less leather chaps dry-hump one another on floats in public!

I'm bothered by books like (One Dad, Two Dads, Brown Dad, Blue Dads)&(Heather Has Two Mommies)being read to 4th grade school children.

I'm bothered by the fact you think I am homophobic

I'm bothered that gay people want the world to bend over for them because of the sex they prefer.

I'm bothered that a civil union between two gay people is not good enough for homosexuals.

I'm bothered don't ask don't tell is not good enough

To me the gay agenda is nothing more than a crusade to force people to accept that homosexuality is normal behavior, and give protected status to a group of people under the law for nothing more than the type of sex they like! Its all a sham!

Sometimes I think gays need convincing themselves that their lifestyle is just,and that's part of the reason there is such a push by the gay community to force non gays into accepting them as normal/natural!

If gay people are born gay then are child molesters born child molesters?
are panty sniffers born panty sniffers?
Or is it all simply sexual perversion?

If its a genetic condition? If so wouldn't natural selection weed out those whom choose not to procreate?

I believe homosexuality is deviant behavior,That is my belief! and what bothers me the most is that members of the gay community would love to
label me as not normal for feeling this way and convince others likewise

THAT MY FRIEND IS THE GAY AGENDA!

so you're bothered....

glad we got that out of the way.

Originally posted by V1g0r0u5

Originally posted by CHA0S

So people, I have a simple question to ask. How has homosexuality impacted YOUR life on a negative scale

Homosexuality has never impacted me in a negative way. In fact, I'd say it hasn't ever impacted me in any way at all. I don't really care what other people want to do, just as long as it doesn't impact anybody in a negative way. And homosexuals are not hurting anybody...you people are sticking your nose into other peoples business...just leave them alone for Christ sakes...and smash a glass bowl over your head while you're at it...because you're an idiot...

[edit on 25/2/10 by CHA0S]

I'm going to regret this...
The fact that some or other action or activity has never impacted you in a negative way does not make that activity right.
How many of us can say that we have been impacted negatively by rape , murder, racism, arson, highjacking, etc...?

Now I'm sure there will be some here who have been impacted negatively by the things I've mentioned, in my case murder and highjacking.
However, I have never been personally impacted by rape or arson. This does not mean it is right or acceptable.

Before, if you were openly gay you had the stuffing knocked out of you. These days gays are tolerated by those who consider them deviants.
I don't stick my nose in gays business. Wherever I look, gays want to stick their business in my nose!

Being gay is in your head. It is not genetic. Show me a scientific test for gayness.
If it is natural, will some men evolve wombs?
Look around you... look to nature to see what is natural.

Flame away

poor argument

you are aware that there are animals that exhibit homosexual behavior?

im willing to bet you didnt.... or else you prolly wouldnt have said that.

Originally posted by Jim Scott
There are people today in this world who are officially married to an animal.
There are people in this world since way back when who are officially married to children...even the founder of Islam---Mohammed.

The OP is not apparently aware of this slippery slope, and is presenting the gay movement as not leading to these perversions.

Please.

and homosexual marriage still isnt nationally recognized

what is your point

Originally posted by Blaine91555
I however am fully grown and heavily armed.

...heavily armed with what?... a winter sock and ping-pong balls?...

If the Gay Agenda involves window treatments, flowers, or GQ magazine, I'm against it (for me). I don't give a rip what you choose to do.

Gay Agenda is a phrase used by the religiously fascist and/or closeted. The straights (and the gays) have much more serious stuff to worry about. It's a non-argument.

But you know that.