Explosive News

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by bigyin

 

I notice that you didn't reply to my question regarding your PE. That's okay, better to let it pass by than to answer with a lie.
I wonder how the faithers world looks through whatever lenses they are looking through?

Goodbye.

What's a PE ?

Originally posted by seethelight
reply to post by Odessy

 

The WTCs were the only building ever build like the WTCs.

And guess what, they were both hit by planes and they both behaved in the same way.

If only one had fallen (which would make less sense IMO) what would you guys be saying?

They didn't fall in free fall, the amount of thermite taken would've been, literally, TONS, there was no time for conventional explosives to have been placed, in the 10s of thousands, as they would be in a controlled demo, etc. etc.



[edit on 24-2-2010 by seethelight]

Soooooooooo, what about WTC7????

Originally posted by seethelight


The WTCs were the only building ever build like the WTCs.

Massive Fail

There have been a lot of buildings built as, tube in tube.

You keep screaming for us to stop lying.

Your the only one lying in this thread

No-one even was looking for evidence at the scene of the towers collapse in the days and weeks following 9/11...

We were all too worried about recieving military grade anthrax in the mail!
(no-one ever talks about that!)

Alot of the events of 9/11 simply don't add up.

Originally posted by rainfall

The Washington Times is covering Richard Gage....??.....

Isn't that MSM..??....

I think the tides are starting to turn...

If the MSM is covering this kind of stuff NOW, it would most likely be an alternative attempt to misdirect the masses from something else.

I hate that I have to say that, but...this is a conspiracy website, and there is always something else going on behind the scenes.

Originally posted by bigyin

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by bigyin

 

I notice that you didn't reply to my question regarding your PE. That's okay, better to let it pass by than to answer with a lie.
I wonder how the faithers world looks through whatever lenses they are looking through?

Goodbye.

What's a PE ?

It's what us 'non-engineers' don't have. When you have put in your time after college, you get to carry a card that says that you are a Professional Engineer!
P.S.: It doesn't come with the degree.


[edit on 24-2-2010 by butcherguy]

Originally posted by Bombeni

The question I still have is -- motive. What would TPTB have to gain by using additional explosive materials to bring down the twin towers? Were the fact that two jetliners being flown into them not enough to inspire retribution, if it was indeed a conspiracy? If the towers had not fallen, the act of flying into them would still have been enough to conjure up a war by the Bush administration.

Hi Bombeni......

After reading your post I can tell you have not researched 9-11....

Research it and you will find your answers....

Originally posted by dereks
Just what evidence would that be exactly?

You ask this on every thread, we tell you on every thread, and then you play dumb. What specific evidence are you looking for exactly? Besides someone piecing together an exploded bomb from dust, what evidence are you looking for in the first place?

And WTC7 free-falling AT ALL kills fire theories instantly. You have to have had (and understood, and recall) physics 101 to understand that though. Which I think is your real problem there. You only THINK you know it all.

I can't tell you how angry it makes me when people shut out the truth. You can always recognize them by the language they use- it's a laundry list of emotional adjectives, and if facts are mentioned at all, it's in the form of "go over there and look it up if you don't believe my tantrum".

Of course, this post of mine is very nearly a tantrum too...

This is a really hard subject to debate, isn't it? Everyone is SO emotional and sure they're right. How are we going to proceed here without a citizen-on-citizen civil war (a tributary gift for TPTB)?

reply to post by 11Indigo11


I already answered.

Keep up.

reply to post by bsbray11


WTC7 DIDN'T FREE FALL.

So there you go.

reply to post by Sean48


Actually that's NOT true.

Give me a single example of a building over 40 stories tall not made with steel re-enforced concrete.

go on.

Until you do you have no evidence I am lying.

Which makes you the... what's it again... oh yes... the liar.

Originally posted by seethelight
WTC7 DIDN'T FREE FALL.

Yeah it did, for a significant part of its total collapse time, and the rest of what we could see of it was also right on top of a free-fall acceleration curve. And this is also coming straight from NIST, the federal agency.

So there you go.

You're lying.

And you also have demonstrated you don't understand conservation of energy at all. Good job. You should really go take physics 101 again (or maybe for the first time) before you come on here to school all of us.

reply to post by dereks


investigate911.org...

Even the ex pm of italy has said 9/11 was an inside job.

Have a read of 2012time2growup.ning.com... instead of being a mug.

Look this has been debunked by several scientist and institutions, including leading universitys and pyro explosive experts. Believe it or not folks, the goverment did not kill 3000 innocent people, terroist did! They hijacked jets full of jet fuel, flew into buildings and it did some things to those buildings even some engineers were shocked at, because with all their figures and such, nothing compared to the real thing happening. I believe its a sad day when Americans believe their goverment killed innocent people, or was even apart of a plot to blow up buildings. Stay away from the peanutbutter folks, its making you nuts!

seethelight, your responses are all emotional, desperate dashes at the people you're typing to. You can almost feel your heartrate climbing and your breath faltering with your nerves. Why are you doing this to yourself? What's the worst thing that could be if the trade centers destruction was a crime by our government? Would you simply be unable to cope with a world where people are so ruthless? Even those who swear they're your allies, your protectors, your friends?

I dare you this: Just pretend to accept it for 24 hours to try it out. Give us a post that says, "o.k., I don't really agree with you guys, but I'll take the new guy's dare. for now, I accept what you're all saying and I'm going to go through one day with the belief that the trade centers were destroyed by our govt, and tomorrow I'll log back in and tell you what I experienced in that day that makes me want to stop believing that and go back to believing what the gov't says happened. see, I'm not just a little kid in a grown ups body."

...(waiting)...

[edit on 24-2-2010 by CultOfSkulls_D-A-ve]

reply to post by Mr_skepticc


how about you give ME proof.

you are not being skeptical when you believe the government story. You are only skeptical when you disbelieve the government story. When you are skeptical of the skeptics, you are for the initial claims, meaning you are not skeptical at all.

[edit on 24-2-2010 by ancient_wisdom]

Originally posted by Mr_skepticc
Look this has been debunked by several scientist and institutions, including leading universitys and pyro explosive experts.

Can you give some examples?

The list here is shorter than you seem to think.

Originally posted by butcherguy

Originally posted by bigyin

Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by bigyin

 

I notice that you didn't reply to my question regarding your PE. That's okay, better to let it pass by than to answer with a lie.
I wonder how the faithers world looks through whatever lenses they are looking through?

Goodbye.

What's a PE ?

It's what us 'non-engineers' don't have. When you have put in your time after college, you get to carry a card that says that you are a Professional Engineer!
P.S.: It doesn't come with the degree.

[edit on 24-2-2010 by butcherguy]

Well in another post I said I wasn't claiming to be an expert. No I don't have a degree in Engineering, I wasn't lucky enough to go to University, but I did go to coolege and got other certificates in Civil Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and also in Naval Architecture.

I used to be a designer on Nuclear Submarines working for the Ministry of Defense, so I know a bit about steel.

I'm still not a Qualified Professional Engineer though.

May I ask what your qualifications are in this field.

Originally posted by bigyin
but I did go to coolege and got other certificates in Civil Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and also in Naval Architecture.

Yet you didn't know what "PE" stood for or about professional licensing?

Something about that just doesn't line up for me.