It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Scarcer
reply to post by demongoat
Whats more important than listing the side affects is the fact that the FDA gives green light to a lot of the more harmful drugs. There's room in the doctors office for some drugs, that people really need for conditions that aren't so easy to cure with therapy and natural means. But all the drugs that do too much damage? Why are they even legal?
Is the FDA really out for our interests?
Doesn't the head of the FDA rotate out every few years and get replaced by a corporate member?
Originally posted by gsuboy
JESUS CHRIST. All of you people bashing prescription meds sound just like Fox news when they use their famous "well some people say..." line.
Give. Concrete. Evidence. Give a specific example of how terribly awful and what pre-meditated trick it was. Yes, the FDA is a business. Everything is a business. I'm 100% positive that SOMEONE, SOMEWHERE would have a huge expose' about all these fake medicines that you are so adamant about.
Everything in life has side effects. If I happen to be the 1% that gets a headache when I take my anti-anxiety meds, then so be it and I'll talk to my doctor to switch to something else that doesn't react with my body that way.
Originally posted by toochaos4u
In some ways I agree and disagree with you. One might be able to manage depending on the severity of the problem. I was given large doses of Adderall and other things for ADHD and Bipolar for several years. It literally zombiefied me to the point that creativity was gone, zeal for anything was gone.
My psychiatrist at the time said that it was all trial and error because they didn't know exactly how anti-depressants worked because some people became worse on them while others showed improvement. Adderall for instance made me violent and ill natured. Prozac made me just not care about anything, calm, souless. Some of the others made me extremely sleepy all the time.
It helped me more so to recognize signs of problems upcoming within my own body. It is hard to describe but, I am also pre-diabetic and by the same account I know when my blood sugar is high or low. Meditation and leaving a stressful job that didn't hold my interests helped out so much. I am happy. I know when an episode is approaching and take a long nap to bypass most of it. Other times realizing that if a certain action is taken that it will be regretted later.
One of my good friends is on medication for schizophrenia. He really needs these meds because he will become a danger to himself. He thinks his parents are poisoning him and that Mormons want to kidnap him and are hiding in his house, bushes etc. It sounds kinda funny but, he is frightened out of his mind. There is just no way for him to be off his meds. It is odd though that when he first stops using medication he becomes extremely creative but, it fades within a day or so to madness. On meds he has no creativity.
Originally posted by gsuboy
JESUS CHRIST. All of you people bashing prescription meds sound just like Fox news when they use their famous "well some people say..." line.
Give. Concrete. Evidence. Give a specific example of how terribly awful and what pre-meditated trick it was. Yes, the FDA is a business. Everything is a business. I'm 100% positive that SOMEONE, SOMEWHERE would have a huge expose' about all these fake medicines that you are so adamant about.
Everything in life has side effects. If I happen to be the 1% that gets a headache when I take my anti-anxiety meds, then so be it and I'll talk to my doctor to switch to something else that doesn't react with my body that way.
Originally posted by demongoat
what drugs do you mean? a lot of the drugs they green light only become dangerous after they are put on the market, it is impossible to determine the outcome of every situation someone might have in the world.
i don't trust natural means, most natural means are less tested than the pharma stuff.
drugs that are safe for 99% of people, might be dangerous for that 1%, does that change the fact that 99% of the people that take the drug get better? or should we just get rid of all medicine that harms a 1% or less due to unforeseen issues?
i would hope so, but they are people and people aren't perfect
i'm not sure what relevance this has to what i posted?
Originally posted by ziggystar60
Originally posted by Full_Vision
No one should ever tell others what to think, what to do, how to act or anything of the sort..and as others here have pointed out as well, its the persons OWN fault if they take random advice without any background or follow up research into said advice..
But isn't this excactly what OzWeatherman said in his OP?
Perhaps you need to read the OP more carefully. Just a suggestion.
Originally posted by loner007
Well Anti depressents do not work full stop if anything they act just exactly like a placebo does. You want proof here www.newsweek.com... and read more links at the bottom.
I suffer from depression and no amount of "medication" will cure me. I have to come to realise people make me depressed and people not using their brains makes me so angry its beyond a joke. I swear I was born on the wrong planet......
To be sure, the drugs have helped tens of millions of people, and Kirsch certainly does not advocate that patients suffering from depression stop taking the drugs.
One criticism, however, could not be refuted: Kirsch had analyzed only some studies of antidepressants. Maybe if he included them all, the drugs would emerge head and shoulders superior to placebos.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by loner007
Well Anti depressents do not work full stop if anything they act just exactly like a placebo does. You want proof here www.newsweek.com... and read more links at the bottom.
I suffer from depression and no amount of "medication" will cure me. I have to come to realise people make me depressed and people not using their brains makes me so angry its beyond a joke. I swear I was born on the wrong planet......
Of course it wont, you dont have depression, you have none of the symptons. Obviously you are ignorant to what it is, or your research is flawed. Simply being angry at people that dont use their brains is nothing caompared to what depression is.
And like I said, yout article also stated this
To be sure, the drugs have helped tens of millions of people, and Kirsch certainly does not advocate that patients suffering from depression stop taking the drugs.
And...
One criticism, however, could not be refuted: Kirsch had analyzed only some studies of antidepressants. Maybe if he included them all, the drugs would emerge head and shoulders superior to placebos.
Hardly, 100% proof
Originally posted by loner007
and dont telll me I dont suffer from depression you dont know me. I have suffered from depression most of my life. you talk about ignorance I suggest you look in the mirror to see who is the ignorant one.
and another thing look up a thing called placebo effect.....
[edit on 24-2-2010 by loner007]
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by loner007
Well Anti depressents do not work full stop if anything they act just exactly like a placebo does. You want proof here www.newsweek.com... and read more links at the bottom.
I suffer from depression and no amount of "medication" will cure me. I have to come to realise people make me depressed and people not using their brains makes me so angry its beyond a joke. I swear I was born on the wrong planet......
Of course it wont, you dont have depression, you have none of the symptons. Obviously you are ignorant to what it is, or your research is flawed. Simply being angry at people that dont use their brains is nothing caompared to what depression is.
And like I said, yout article also stated this
To be sure, the drugs have helped tens of millions of people, and Kirsch certainly does not advocate that patients suffering from depression stop taking the drugs.
And...
One criticism, however, could not be refuted: Kirsch had analyzed only some studies of antidepressants. Maybe if he included them all, the drugs would emerge head and shoulders superior to placebos.
Hardly, 100% proof