It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SonsOfAnarchy
reply to post by Deaf Alien
Just reading it over a few times and thinking about it you said "They could not help it." If they could not control themselves from killing someone, what role do these people play in society?? I used the example of Charles Manson a couple times in this thread...he pretty much created his own colony of murderers, I might not know everything about this guy but I know enough to deem him a bad person. I believe he was supposed to get the death penalty but it was abolished in California and he got life in prison instead. So tax payers paid to keep this guy alive instead of getting rid of this scum.
Originally posted by SonsOfAnarchy
Today, for the first, I saw the Boondock Saints and started thinking whether killing bad/evil people is okay. I was always against any sort of violence but honestly in today's world with all these gangs, drug dealers, rapists etc. I think killing them may be a viable option...What do you guys think?? Is it okay to kill bad people(who are clearly bad)??
Originally posted by LadySkadi
reply to post by rcwj1975
I'm going to pass on the video...
A more scary thought, there are people in this world that will do so without emotional response because they are incapable of the emotional response. Some people are wired differently (or maybe mis-wired) is a better concept.
[edit on 5-2-2010 by LadySkadi]
Originally posted by superrat
Of course it is.
We are engaged in a battle with enemies that want us all dead and will stop at nothing to accomplish that. The alternative to killing them is to just wait until they kill us. I don't think so. That is plain stupid.
Kill them before they kill us.
Originally posted by bowlbyville
Remember the Bible verse, "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" - what that means is that if someone blinds you in one eye, you can't go back to them and take two from them. It's called "measured justice."
Justice requires that you match the punishment with the crime. So while I believe it's OK to put a person to death for certain crimes, the penalty of death has to be measured against their crime.
Originally posted by SonsOfAnarchy
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Yes, and highly encouraged also
We KNOW who the bad people are also...so, here is a checklist, kill any in these groups
rapists
thieves
drug dealers
drug users
alchoholics
republicans
communists
democrats
anyone over 45
men with beards
women with beards
sex offenders
sex addicts
sexually repressed
sexy women that wont date me
satanists
christians
anyone not a christian
politicians
the white man
the brown man
the yellow man
the red man
hmm...think thats a good start...more may come later.
I understand where you are coming from...that basically someone who hates Jews may call Jews evil or someone who hates Muslims may call Muslims evil but I mean more like unanimous decisions such as a cereal killer who has killed a few dozen innocent people. Would this person or other murderers, rapists or drug dealers okay to kill?
[edit on 4-2-2010 by SonsOfAnarchy]
I was bad once...a long time ago. I payed my dues and now I am not the same person I was back then. I'm glad no one killed me.
Originally posted by IceHappy
reply to post by grey580
But who is responsible for the next victims family????? .
Its fine for all of you to say let live but who is responsible for the next crime?
Remember it could have been preventable, and that is the major point I have been making which none of you Nimby's have been addressing!!!!!
Opposite motto of the Mercs "Let them all live and let God sort them out!!
But what about the victims and their families????
edit to enter last three paragraphs
[edit on 2/5/2010 by IceHappy]
Originally posted by IceHappy
reply to post by jrmcleod
You still have not suggested what you would say to the kin of the next victim of this attacker if you had a chance to stop them and did not. What would you say to their mother. Say the second victim was your cousin, what would you say to your aunt. You just stood there and did nothing. What would she say to you??? "Oh well I can make another child"?????
edited for spelling
[edit on 2/5/2010 by IceHappy]
Originally posted by IceHappy
reply to post by jrmcleod
As you just suggested Kill everyone who commit murder would end this arguement by the fact that there would no further murders and no further victims by a known killer! Seems like a solution... I don't understand your tree business as I never in my life heard of someone die from a tree that repeated uprooted itself killing many people after being caught as a killer tree!
Originally posted by IceHappy
reply to post by jrmcleod
I am glad you are not related to me or be my neighbour or at any time served in the same service as myself.
I also do not know anyone who would have lost a child knowing you could have prevented it allow you to speak to them again let alone a lame attempt of comfort. Hugging does not bring back the dead nor does it make a girl who was innocent before her rape a virgin.
The pioneers that settled the west as the west kept moving would have no time for you. That is IMHO... May your God bless you.