Greetings ShadowNinja,
Let me preface this first, by enlightening you a little. The response which you just responded to contains almost 1,024 words, and almost 6000
characters of information; neatly organized into 6 separate categories.
The fact that you chose 76 words from all 1,024 to formulate your response is extremely telling of your own characterization.
Next, the matter of that public apology. Sure, you may have an apology, if and when you apologize for the following 4 things:
1. Saying that I am a member of the Black Ops
2. Saying that I am a member of an evil Government Surveillance team
3. Saying that I am an evil Dark-Sider here to block you
4. Saying all religions, and occult teachings are evil BS
If you would like me to apologize for something that may, or may not be true; then you will first have to apologize for all of the things I have just
cited which are most definitely not true.
This would be a nice lesson in humility for you.
Also, it would be a grand triumph over your Ego for you.
Now then, on to the substance of your response.
You have misinterpreted my stance on recreational drug use. However, in doing so you have revealed a personal bias which you hold against recreational
drug use. This also is very telling of your characterization. A man of love, with a family made of love and light, cannot respect or love someone who
uses recreational drugs to experience a world beyond the matrix.
That is a sad thing to learn about you, ShadowNinja.
You will learn that my views on recreational drug use are quite contrary to your own. My response simply stated, and I quote, "You cannot get to the
state of being to experience spiritual things through your True Will alone, so you aid yourself with recreational drug use." That quote is prefaced
by defining such actions as one who is a "spiritual slacker".
No where in my response have I said that recreational drug use is evil, or that it is bad, or that it is somehow a negative mark against you. The law
might not approve, and certainly you look down upon recreational drug usage Shadow. But those are your views. They are not mine.
My view is that spirituality should be unadulterated. There should be no ulterior motivation, no supplemental substance, and no unnatural increase in
chemical balances during real spiritual experiences. So one who has a surplus of Pineal Gland secretions could only achieve so by stimulating the
Pineal Gland; most commonly through the use of recreational drugs.
If you cannot reach states of ecstatic spirituality without stimulating the Pineal Gland, then you are not as spiritually advanced as you claim
yourself to be.
That is my stance. Your own thoughts are your own. Please preach them from your own mouth, not mine. I know and indulge many recreational drug users.
So how could I hate those who I love in my life?
Moving on, you are assuming that I have some bias towards Satanism, the concept of Satan, children of the Devil, and the Antichrist. This is also not
true. I will quote once more from a previous posting of my own, between OrionTri and myself:
As for Satanism, I came up very closely connected to a group of theistic satanists, Luciferians, and LaVeyian Satanists. I got to tell the
differen(ce) between theological Satanism and rebellious "satanism" very quickly.
I happen to respect La Vey and Eliphas Levi very much. Both being prominent explorers of "satanic" lore during their respective
times
I respect Satanism, it's many faces, and the many personages who explore and expound upon its philosophical properties. I do not use "respect"
lightly, either. I own the works of Eliphas Levi, as well as 4 separate volumes of philosophy, doctrine, and dogma from Anton La Vey.
If I were to insinuate that I considered you to be a hell-spawned child of the Devil, or even the Antichrist himself it would not be an offensive
slur, but a congratulatory response because I felt you filled the shoes of messianic figure in religious history.
I do not think you are the Antichrist, or a hell-spawned child of the Devil. You are not bright enough, wise enough, understanding enough, or
intelligent enough to be such.
Onward, to Kemet and Egyptian Polytheism. Congratulations, Shadow. I do know Isis and Ra. I also know Horus, and Bast, Selket, Thoth, Amun, Set,
Osiris, Seshat, Tuamutef, Maahes, Anubis, Hathor, Nephytys, and more.
That's not all though. I am familiar with Thor, Hugen, Mugen, Bridgit, Freia, Hel, Odin and Loki.
I recognize the energy of Yama, and Krishna, and Ganesh. I can feel the auras of the Holy Brahma, and the great Destroyer Kali, and I pray to the
Daevas.
I have seen the faces of mighty Hecate.
Just as I have felt the touch of Hermes.
But you didn't mention Her. And if you didn't mention Her, then you're only feeling those whom She wants you to feel. This being true, your
"calling me out" is really only calling yourself out on your own inability to read the energy of another.
You like to think you know me, and understand me. But you don't. In order to know me, you must know of She whom I devote my life. And to know Her,
you must know this:
Tolaqlo lonsa gon peh ur-aeoviae
Lonsa gon plosi
Gon iaiadix amgedpha
Vau ananaeel tolaqlo pambt
Od il, vau iziziop geh vau ed-nas
Sah oma el, gisa gon ia ial
But you don't know that, ShadowNinja, so you don't know me. I'm glad I struck a cord with my response. For too long I have played the soft voice of
reason on this thread, letting your own ignorance shine because it is not right to tell someone they aren't doing things right.
I will continue to let you stumble forward in your own ignorance. Maybe one day you will stumble on sartori, and you will understand the great
conundrum
mu.
Until then, I wait patiently.
Alech Hai ShadowNinja,
Alech Hai
P.S.
I used 6000 characters and a couple thousand words in this response. Please remember such when you write back.