It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by djusdjus
paranoid cherry picking nonsense.
Originally posted by djusdjus
paranoid cherry picking nonsense.
Can some of you please stop pushing your I hate Obama agendas with weak, cherry picked sound bytes.
This is like death panels and other nonsense all over again.
Back it up, or shut it up.
Originally posted by XTexan
I think that instead of a fine or jail time for not maintaining health insurance you should have to show that you have sufficient funds to pay a medical bill before receiving treatment.
That way if you show up to the doctor and you have no insurance and do not have the cash on hand to pay then you get turned away.
Then the bill will insure that those who can't afford health insurance will still receive it. If you can afford to pay your bills, then you'll be ok.
It will also insure that those of you who don't want to maintain health insurance and can't afford your medical bills will be turned away.
Works for me.
Originally posted by Erasurehead
reply to post by Rockstrongo37
People can choose not to drive a car if they don't want to pay for auto insurance. Mandatory health insurance amounts to a tax on just existing as a human being. This goes against everything America once stood for.
Originally posted by marg6043
Originally posted by chiron613
Fascist? I don't think so. How is this any different from requiring drivers to have auto insurance?
People who don't have health insurance become a drain on the economy when they get sick or injured. Not only can't they work, they wind up getting emergency treatment or being put on disability. The state picks up the tab, eventually - and we all pay for that.
This way, we'll be paying for our own insurance. Oh, and chances are better that people will get treatments earlier, which could very well help prevent them from becoming more seriously disabled by their illnesses. The way it is right no, people without insurance don't seek help until they're deathly ill, and by then their treatment may wind up being far more expensive than it would have been, had they gone sooner.
Originally posted by Izarith
Originally posted by Rockstrongo37
reply to post by clay2 baraka
Hey if your at all in question about the "jail" time punishment look here...
“H.R. 3962 provides that an individual (or a husband and wife in the case of a joint return) who does not, at any time during the taxable year, maintain acceptable health insurance coverage for himself or herself and each of his or her qualifying children is subject to an additional tax.” [page 1]
- - - - - - - - - -
“If the government determines that the taxpayer’s unpaid tax liability results from willful behavior, the following penalties could apply…” [page 2]
- - - - - - - - - -
“Criminal penalties
Prosecution is authorized under the Code for a variety of offenses. Depending on the level of the noncompliance, the following penalties could apply to an individual:
• Section 7203 – misdemeanor willful failure to pay is punishable by a fine of up to $25,000 and/or imprisonment of up to one year.
• Section 7201 – felony willful evasion is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.” [page 3]
Originally posted by TruthSeeker8300
reply to post by Izarith
...but where can I read the real bill?