It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by vor78
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Something is very wrong here. First it was a high powered assault rifle, now it's two hand guns. 42 people hit with two handguns. Either that guy was the best shot in the history of shooting, or this is a flat out lie.
If it happened in a confined area, its definitely plausible. That's basically what happened at Virginia Tech, which only involved handguns.
Originally posted by dwiggen
Here's an update because I haven't seen anything yet:
All three were soldiers, one was a Major (a fairly high ranking officer), and the original shooter was an Army mental health officer... ironic. All three are in their late thirties or early forties. That's the part that strikes me as the most odd. I could understand if these guys were a couple of young privates scared of getting deployed, or not happy with the way things were going in their lives. But these were middle aged men, with seemingly successful careers. Why would they suddenly throw that all away by shooting up a Soldier Readiness Center?
Also, they've already ruled out terrorism.
Originally posted by jefwane
reply to post by captaintyinknots
Umm you don't walk around in armor and armed on a millitary base unless you have a good reason to, like while training, on guard, or as an MP. This readiness center would have been like a mix between a gym and a suite of doctors offices. Security would have most likely been, maybe an armed civilian DoD guard or MP's. You'd have a large group of crowded people that would mostly bee unarmed, getting shot's filling out paper work in crowds and lines.
Originally posted by captaintyinknots
Yes but that was not on a military base. Obviously it takes reaction time to get to your weapons, but the guy was taking out cops and SWAT Team members. People in armor. People that were armed.
I'm sorry, but this is in no way possible.
Originally posted by dwiggen
Also, they've already ruled out terrorism.
Have you even read the info?
At least 3 SWAT team members were wounded. These are people that ABSOLUTELY would be in armor.
Originally posted by dwiggen
reply to post by redoubt
Well I guess I should have clarified: most of my info is coming from a buddy of mine who is stationed at Hood. And believe it or not, the evil dreaded MSM (shudder) actually has most of it right. Sometimes a few minutes late though.