It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
MysterX
You appear to be making a false assumption. You seem to be saying that if someone has a profound thought or idea, then that thought or idea actually IS profound outside of their imagination..
How is it any different from someone who dies in an accident and has never told anyone what they want done with their remains. What right does anyone have to bury or cremate the remains? It is based purely on the whims and preferences of the survivors, nothing else. Your argument is based on the premise that the majority of people in the world have the same viewpoint as yours, and you assume that, therefore, the owner of the skeleton would have wanted the same. Besides, what happens to unidentified bones does not affect any survivors, so how can it be an ethical issue?
MysterX
network dude
reply to post by MysterX
RIght, and those who would condemn something without understanding it are exactly where they belong. On the outside.
Lol..what's to understand mate?
A group of tossers drinking something from an animal or human skull is what it is, it's a group of tossers ascribing some ethereal meaning to it where none really exists...it means nothing, regardless of what those who would do it imagine it means. It's simply a dead part of an animals anatomy that can hold a liquid...apart from the barbaric, ghoulish aspect, that's about as deep as it goes IMO.
network dude
reply to post by oxford
just because you are not OK with it, doesn't mean everyone else has to stop doing what they are doing.
And check your drivers licences, if it has a little heart on it, they you too have offered whatever parts others want once you die. I have one. When my spirit leaves this earth, it will not be taking my body with it.
Saurus
oxford
No its not a Western pov, It just seems very unethical, would understand if they were former members etc but because most lodges don't even know where they come from,...
...Its because they are 'unknowns' and probably wouldn't agree to it while they were alive that bothers me, if it was one of your own lot I wouldn't bat an eyelash and could quite happily accept that.
How is it any different from someone who dies in an accident and has never told anyone what they want done with their remains. What right does anyone have to bury or cremate the remains? It is based purely on the whims and preferences of the survivors, nothing else. Your argument is based on the premise that the majority of people in the world have the same viewpoint as yours, and you assume that, therefore, the owner of the skeleton would have wanted the same. Besides, what happens to unidentified bones does not affect any survivors, so how can it be an ethical issue?
it comes across to me as the desecration of human remains.
...Just because people have been doing stuff for years or it might stem from an Indigenous tribe doesn't make it ok, it is more important to question what we do on a personal level rather than follow a tribe blindly.
I live in Africa where such practices are commonplace, and not considered to be desecration, nor are they considered unethical. In Preceptories where such practices are generally frowned upon, artificial skulls are used, and in some constitutions, such as the English constitution, they have actually substituted this piece of ritual with something slightly different.
Besides, how do you know it's desecration, when you don't know what the ritual entails, or symbolizes?
Just out of interest how many here would donate their own skull to their lodge for this initiation?
It's not an initiation!!!!!!
Oh my God, did you think this was all for fun or to embarrass the candidate. The part of the ritual in question teaches one of the deepest and most beautiful lessons on life and our own mortality in all of Freemasonry!
I don't care what my body is used for after I die - I would gladly have a Lodge using my bones. However, since what happens to my remains after I die affects the grieving process of my family, I will leave it up to them to decide.
Also, in the case of unidentified bones, relatives don't come into the issue, and there are, therefore, no such considerations to take into account.
edit on 17/12/2013 by Saurus because: (no reason given)
MysterX
reply to post by Aleister
Does eating ice cream from a skull mean that the brain freeze is halved?
oxford
If I got a camera crew and went out into the streets of Britain and asked a good selection of people, ‘How would you feel about the Masons using your Skull after you die, to drink out of in one of their rituals?’ I would be very surprised if I even found one person that would be ok with it, most would be downright horrified!
You say the English constitution has replaced this with something slightly different, so this ritual with real skulls isn’t practiced in the UK?
LABTECH767
... however it did most certainly not originate in the catholic church and begs the question of weather the quote made was made by someone whom has actually read the new testament,
Saurus
oxford
If I got a camera crew and went out into the streets of Britain and asked a good selection of people, ‘How would you feel about the Masons using your Skull after you die, to drink out of in one of their rituals?’ I would be very surprised if I even found one person that would be ok with it, most would be downright horrified!
You say the English constitution has replaced this with something slightly different, so this ritual with real skulls isn’t practiced in the UK?
Correct.
English constitution Masons (under the United Grand Lodge of England) do not drink out of a skull at all, either real or artificial (the ritual is slightly different for this part). This is because, as you say, the English are not comfortable with the idea.
Many constitutions still do (such as the Scottish, Irish, American and many other constitutions), but usually from an artificial one.
Some Preceptories do use a real skull, but this more commonly found outside of Europe.
edit on 17/12/2013 by Saurus because: (no reason given)
superluminal11
You will never truly get a straight answer from another Mason here. Why?
Because they are on the lower rungs of the ladder and don't know anything beyond what they know.
Ignore them. The lower initiates and outer courts are designed by the upper rungs of the ladder and inner courts to keep you busy and preoccupied.