It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by earlywatcher
reply to post by js331975
this is old news. we've seen it and discussed it. what's your point in bringing it up now?
In June, the Obama campaign released an electronic copy of the certificate bearing the seal of the State of Hawaii Department of Health and showing that Barack Hussein Obama II was born to mother Stanley Ann Dunham in Honolulu at 7:24 p.m. on Aug. 4, 1961.
(Bold Text Emphasis by me)
The issue of whether Obama is a “natural born citizen”—a citizen at birth—was raised in a June 10 article on the conservative Web site World Net Daily.
Hawaii was a state in 1961, when Obama was born. Any person born in the U.S. automatically is a “natural born citizen,” said University of California Los Angeles law professor Eugene Volokh.
Even if a person is born outside the United States, courts have ruled any child born to at least one U.S. citizen is a U.S. citizen, Volokh said. Stanley Ann Dunham would have counted even if Obama’s Kenyan father did not.
Dunham was three months shy of her 19th birthday when Obama was born. But subsequent acts of Congress relaxed the requirement to five years in the U.S., including just two years after the age of 14, meaning Dunham could have been 16 and still qualified even if Obama was born in another country, Volokh said. Congress made the law retroactive to 1952, doubly covering Obama.
Any legal challenge would have to argue that Congress can’t make someone retroactively a citizen at birth, and prove Obama was born outside of the U.S. after all.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Originally posted by Mak Manto
Except he was born in Hawaii... A US state.
So what? That does not necessarily mean that you are a natural born citizen. Your point is moot. Plus, him being born in Hawaii is debatable.
[edit on 7/22/2009 by WhatTheory]
Originally posted by earlywatcher
reply to post by imsuchaniceguy
how comforting. your prose is like a comfortable old shoe. old and worn out. this is certainly not about racism. that's a tired old argument.
and we've discussed the eligibility issue to death with no progress to speak of, blah blah blah
Originally posted by earlywatcher
reply to post by imsuchaniceguy
look at green technologyblah blah blah.
Originally posted by TheWake
Where were you brainwashed Ron Paulians during the last 8 years?, Oh I guess invading Iraq was okay. As Bush and his crones sucked the oil dry right in front of your faces but that was okay. The Patriot Act. Nah thats okay too, it going to "protect" us in the long run. Freedoms being takin away in the name of terrorism. Where were you Libertarians? Constitutional defenders? Now a man comes along a promises something America hasent had in a long time. Change. It may not be going the way you like but the man has a great outlook on the future of our country and your not giving him a chance. You people dont want to blame Bush. Most of you voted for him. What so aweful has Obama done to make you want to start a civil war?
Look Obama, for being in over half a year, is still cleaning up GW's mess. The economy was already falling short before Obama ever had any kind of power.
There's something fishy about you Ron Paulians , some underlying hatred that none of you want to admit. I cant help but to think its a race issue. The man was born in Hawaii move the hell on. What happened when ATS was all about anti- Faux News and legitimate media. When Hannity was the epitome of mis-information? Where did all those people go?
[edit on 22-7-2009 by TheWake]
Originally posted by imsuchaniceguy
Huh?????
Do you know anything about the U.S.?
Being born on our soil does not necessarily make him natural born and both parents need to be Americans?
You really need to lear some things about this country before speaking up so much about it.
Bingham had explained that to be born within the allegiance of the United States the parents, or more precisely, the father, must not owe allegiance to some other foreign sovereignty
What better way to insure attachment to the country then to require the President to have inherited his American citizenship through his American father and not through a foreign father. Any child can be born anywhere in the country and removed by their father to be raised in his native country. The risks would be for the child to return in later life to reside in this country bringing with him foreign influences and intrigues, thus, making such a citizen indistinguishable from a naturalized citizen.
So what? That does not necessarily mean that you are a natural born citizen. Your point is moot. Plus, him being born in Hawaii is debatable.
Originally posted by Mak Manto
Actually, you're wrong.
If you're born on American soil, you're an American.
Barack Obama was born in Hawaii. That makes him a U.S. citizen.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
blah blah blah blah
US law clearly stipulates: If only one parent was a US citizen at the time of your birth, that parent must have resided in the United States for at least Ten years, at least five of which had to be after the age of 16.
Originally posted by earlywatcher
reply to post by imsuchaniceguy
the problems with his eligibility to run for president had to do with his mother being too young to grant him citizenship and his father not being a US citizen,