It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to reports, one month after Sonnenfeld was released, former cell-mate Robert Dryer said that Sonnenfeld had told him how he shot his wife behind the ear and put her finger on the gun's trigger as he pulled it himself. Another former inmate, Damian Whitehead, said he and Sonnenfeld met after they were released from jail. According to him, Sonnenfeld said he killed his wife and that he couldn't bear to have her leave him.
Originally posted by alienj
reply to post by randyvs
Please provide proof of your your statement as to what "Bush" said. I love how people read something off a blog and then recall it as fact.
Originally posted by poet1b
I did a search, and this is what I found as the reason for re-opening the case.
According to reports, one month after Sonnenfeld was released, former cell-mate Robert Dryer said that Sonnenfeld had told him how he shot his wife behind the ear and put her finger on the gun's trigger as he pulled it himself. Another former inmate, Damian Whitehead, said he and Sonnenfeld met after they were released from jail. According to him, Sonnenfeld said he killed his wife and that he couldn't bear to have her leave him.
In Sep 2004, over two years later, files are charged, re-opening the case, and this is all they got?
Can't say I blame him, since they tried to cover up evidence to get him convicted, and now are relying on evidence from a couple of cons looking for a reduction in their prison sentences to get him back into their custody.
After interviewing additional witnesses, obtaining more forensic evidence and gathering more blood work, Ritter filed an at-large arrest warrant in December 2003 for Sonnenfeld, which was distributed nationally and globally.
...the defense investigation found a note written by Nancy Sonnenfeld which police had not taken into evidence, said public defender Carrie Thompson. "Our investigators found a letter written in Nancy's own hand consistent with a suicide letter, although it was very cryptic," Thompson said. She said the letter said, "What is more beautiful than love and death?" with the word "love" scratched out. "Kurt, please get help."
The letter was found behind a framed photograph of Kurt Sonnenfeld. ...
Attacking Sonnenfeld, who is only the messenger, is just an attempt to direct attention away from the evidence.
Originally posted by alienj
reply to post by larphillips
Wow like I said, people like yourself like to change the truth around to suit your needs, There is video of the first plane hitting the trade towers, you can youtube it if you want too. It was reported long before the 2nd plane hit the trade tower, I had time to get a cup of coffee and wake my wife up before the second plane hit. But none of this will mean anything to someone who wants to twist the truth and believe lies. It was a New story about firefighters as they heard the planes go overhead and if I am correct it was a live news broadcast at the time in New York city
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by Soloist
Who knows what the real story with the death of his wife is. Seems to be many different reports. I really don't think this is critical to the discussion.
It is extremely critical to the discussion. If he is lying about murdering his wife, how can you take his word about anything? That's all you have, his word. Nothing else. He claims to have "evidence" (after being charged with his wife's murder) now, and that's why he's being "framed".
People here are automatically believing his WORD, why? Because it's what they WANT to believe, they defend a wanted killer without one shred of his "evidence".
Open your eyes or risk being blinded like the rest of them.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
At least there is some evidence that he did not kill his wife! The suicide note, the fact that the charges have been dropped at least once before, and now the supposed evidence from 09/11. I would venture to say there is more evidence in his favor than against him.
If the big bad boogey men wanted to get him because he has such smoking gun evidence, and that's what this whole ordeal is about, they would but only have to put a bullet in his head and be done with it. Letting this get any publicity is just plain silly.
Originally posted by Victoria 1
Wouldn't common sense tell people that there was probably a mention of an attack before it happened. Maybe that is why they were setting up before hand......... Why's it always have to be (in some people's minds) this crazy conspiracy?