It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But yet the focus is on the false accusations and NOT on the brutal real life rapes?
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
Yes, and the focus is only on women (no men) who are raped or cry wolf, which is completely ridiculous as well.
[edit on 22-5-2009 by rapinbatsisaltherage]
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Originally posted by riley
So if they worked you would think they could be used..?
If lie detectors were 100% then they'd be used in every case not just rape and yes i'd support them. At the moment however they are nothing more than voodoo, i know they are used in some court rooms but the entire thing is really sketchy. You can look that up on google and find out more, they really are awful things.
Originally posted by riley
Well the only rapes where violence isn't involved is statuatory and drunk/drugged rapes. These really do need to be assessed on their merits. Date rape is a very tricky one for example, of course if rohipnol or something of that nature is found in the girls system then it's a damn terrible thing. Drunken rapes are really difficult for courts and i would hate to serve on a jury over that kind of case. The flase rapes i quoted at the start though i believe were not drunk or drugged..
As for statutory rape, it's a really difficult one. I again bring up my friend of a friend who was almost convicted of having sex with an underage girl that he met in an over 18's nightclub. Should he be done for rape when he honestly believed she was 18 or over? That's a murky law and it must always be addressed on the individual case. However i can tell you now that if he'd been done his life would have been much different.
Originally posted by riley
I do not agree with the media going over board on alledged rapists but a fairer courtoom? Rape victims don't even have that.. they're still vilified on the stand so making it "fairer" on rape suspects would just screw over victims more.
You don't agree?
Well i simply mean police who have been coached, by psychologists to understand the language and body language used by rape victims. It would be a case of sitting specialised officers down in front of videos of real and false rape victims and studying them. The police actually record many interviews on video now, there is a massive database to draw on for such research. That would be a good start.
Please explain again why I should be ashamed of myself? I did not brag about sexual exploits or degrade this young women I had sex with.
I am actually on decent terms with her now because she has matured a bit. Thanks for coming in here just to make me look bad when in fact I tried to be as gentle as possible with the topic.
If you can't handle the topic then go read another thread...
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
Not really as again this was being discussed with a group of female friends and so i only thought of that.
If you want to discuss the men then go for it, however the false accusations of rape in men are far less than women.
Originally posted by intrepid
Ok, it's 5 minutes since my last post. I will assume that by now it has been read by everyone. Any further posts personal in nature after this post will be deleted.
Originally posted by riley
So basically you are all for seeing if a woman is telling the truth when she reports a rape? So should everyone who reports a crime do the same thing? Talk about adding insult to injury.. :shk:
Originally posted by riley
I agree the drink spiking/driunk ra[es a difficults and they rarely get convictions.
Originally posted by riley
I can undertand why a 17 year old might be thoght to be 18 but when a girl is 16 she is going to sound like a 16 yo. Yes I think men should ask for IDs.. might sound silly to some but it's better than going to prison.
Originally posted by riley
Remember "context"? I said I do agree the media should be under better contol but I do not agree the court system is fair on rape victims.
Originally posted by riley
They are well trained in body language and are in fact good at detecting lies. To fool them you'd have to be a body language expert who knew how to put on a good act. I'm not sure why you would assume they do not know what they are doing. The police involved in the cases your posted obviously need to be trained properly but I do not know the specifics or why they stuffed the case up.
Originally posted by riley
deleted in good faith.
[edit on 22-5-2009 by riley]
Here is a question, for every guy that faces FALSE charges, how many real rapists do you think never get charged? All crimes have a conviction rate, wonder what that rate is for rape? This is about likelihood, the likehood of a woman making up false charges.
Originally posted by rapinbatsisaltherage
If you want to discuss the men then go for it, however the false accusations of rape in men are far less than women.
That doesn't mean that women are solely to blame for this issue. You're turning an issue about people (of both genders) falsely accusing others of a horrible act into an issue about women using the power of the "R" word. Whether you realize it or not, you are very specifically making this a gender issue.
[edit on 22-5-2009 by rapinbatsisaltherage]
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
and again - I wonder about this whole topic
why aren't we discussing false convictions - period?
why is this about rape - and the unfair advantage women have over men?
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984Ahh i always manage to agree with someone on something However they do get convictions, usually due to people deliberately spiking drinks and it being shown as such.
Men are less likely to report rape for a start, that's a fact.
So please tell me where i have avoided adding men in here once you bought it up?