It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by spitefulgod
reply to post by Dutty_Rag
Wow, you're so liberal and stand up for human "rights", I hope that works out for you. people kill animals all the time, but setting it on fire is sick, they are sick. The judge made a stand hopefully others will follow, then maybe people will stop thinking it's OK and FUN. Maybe you're right maybe with a good telling of they would have become fine upstanding citizens.
Originally posted by spuddyboy
well, where i come from, (the UK) we dont even get near 25 years for killing another human being. i think alot of people have this or that to say about america, but one thing is for sure, you commit a crime over there and you do get the punishment you deserve. If only they'd adopt the same policy over in this soft touch country instead of worrying about the criminals human rights, maybe we wouldnt have so many problems. i say hopefully the 2 young men who did this do get a lot of time, maybe 25 years is pretty heavy, but some jail time would be good
Originally posted by jeanpierre
Tankthinker,
you strike me as a typical left-brain thinker. What I am interested in is this : exactly what value do you give to concepts such as love and respect ?
Do you always place rational thinking above sentiment, or are there situations in which you would actually choose to follow your heart instead of your brain ?
Originally posted by dodgygeeza
Originally posted by spitefulgod
reply to post by Dutty_Rag
Wow, you're so liberal and stand up for human "rights", I hope that works out for you. people kill animals all the time, but setting it on fire is sick, they are sick. The judge made a stand hopefully others will follow, then maybe people will stop thinking it's OK and FUN. Maybe you're right maybe with a good telling of they would have become fine upstanding citizens.
I'm pretty sure if you knew these kids personally you'd know that the prospect of spending 25 years behind would be enough to make even the toughest of people eternally repentant. It worries me that you see it fit that kids should have their lives ruined over a CAT. Do you value animal life more than human life?
At least the cat didn't have to suffer 25 years of torment like these kids will..... the punishment doesn't fit the crime.
Originally posted by Dutty_Rag
I'm a former animal owner and once exited my house to where my dog was sat on my lawn to find a local teen about to kick him. Understandably I was furious and marched the teen back to his parents and demanded he was punished...
We don't take a human life for a cats life, that is absurd.
Originally posted by spitefulgod
Is a 25 year sentence enough for setting a child on fire??
[edit on 24/3/2009 by spitefulgod]
Originally posted by spitefulgod
reply to post by Dutty_Rag
Wow, you're so liberal and stand up for human "rights", I hope that works out for you. people kill animals all the time, but setting it on fire is sick, they are sick. The judge made a stand hopefully others will follow, then maybe people will stop thinking it's OK and FUN. Maybe you're right maybe with a good telling of they would have become fine upstanding citizens.
Originally posted by Solomons
This is...just absolutely ridiculous..they should obviously be punished for breaking and entering+ animal cruelty...but 25years?...really...what a way to clog up the system.
Originally posted by dodgygeeza
Originally posted by spitefulgod
Is a 25 year sentence enough for setting a child on fire??
[edit on 24/3/2009 by spitefulgod]
On my planet, setting fire to a cat is in no way the same as setting fire to a child.