It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by seekclarity
reply to post by Anomic of Nihilism
Fascinating, great post. Couple this with other peculiarities like the Cydonia photos and you have a case for something.
Originally posted by mi2sense
reply to post by Anomic of Nihilism
There are some real gullible folks out there.
So what could it be guys?
Is it possible that something fell off the Rover? Anyone got the FOGGIEST what this might be
Originally posted by mi2sense
RFBurns asks; “Who is everyone?” Let me ask anyone here; are you trying to tell me that you deny that you see many many rocks in this one photo?
Originally posted by mi2sense
I rest my case. You and every single other person that has commented on this blog GENERALLY ACCEPTS that there are many many rocks in this one photo and that was my simple yet profound point. I think if you weren’t being so smug you could have been able to not overlook that one seemingly insignificant FACT. Those who leave out such simple facts are the ones caught up in a “my way or the highway” box and thank you for making it so painfully evident to all.
Originally posted by mi2sense
Your provable datasets are just flash cards you keep pushing here that are nothing but theory interpretations RFB and all your fuss and muss to contend some kind of interpretation of this photo of rocks; is just you trying to be pushy with your personal opinion. That they’ve found nothing but rocks there is the cold hard fact and I’m sorry if that bursts your bubble/box.
Originally posted by mi2sense
I never argued that everyone generally accepts my conclusion about that rock/rocks in question and your argument calling mine a tiny box is the perfect illustration that demonstrates that your perception sees things from a confine that is square shaped and closed minded. If it could be proven that the object/objects in question is just a rock/rocks, then all your speculation, no matter how haughty you presented it; is just hogwash. On the other hand, if it could be proven that the makeup is not rock; then praise be to actual scientific evidence that proved object/objects in the midst of many many rocks was not a rock. Until then, speculation should be labeled as such.
Originally posted by mi2sense
My speculation is that the object/objects are the same as the other 99.5% of the rest of the photo; rocks.
Originally posted by mi2sense
I’ll always stand amazed how evolutionists/UFOians interpret this universe with their preconceived desires. Two hundred years ago, some entertained the idea of kissing a frog and the frog becoming a man was a fairytale; today its evolution.
The scientific goals of the Pancam
investigation are to assess the high resolution morphology,
topography, and geologic context of each MER landing site; to obtain
color images to constrain the mineralogic, photometric, and physical
properties of surface materials; and to determine dust and aerosol
opacity and physical properties from direct imaging of the Sun and
sky.