It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cluckerspud
Central Scrutinizer:
The white zone is for loading and unloading.
If you have to load or unload, please use to the white zone.
Originally posted by arizonascott
Why has ATS started not posting Anonymous posts. Other than collecting IP's a person should be able to post an anonymous post, but I guess the censorship is in high gear on all sites....
Originally posted by impaired
This stuff is all disturbing.
But what if we're wrong?
What if we get all ready and nothing happens?
I'm not saying I don't think it's all a possibility. The camps are real, so are the coffins. But what about this:
Why would the coffins be out on the side of the road? Why not underground?
What if this is all just in case a natural disaster or a nuke hits us?
Hey, I just wanna know too, but this is one of those things that we won't know until it happens. Right?
If I'm wrong, tell me. Not here to fight
Originally posted by Blaine91555
reply to post by SHADOW462
I wonder just how many people it would take to take the entire population prisoner and control us? One million, two million or three?
Lets see now. They would all have to be in on it from the start. They would have to be willing to kill their fellow citizens or imprison them. Even Hitler was not fool enough to try that.
How do you go about knowing which of us is safe to ask to do this to our neighbors and know they would not tell anyone else? How do you get that many people to keep a secret during the planning and training?
I guess you could train them and them not know what for, but at some point they would have to be told and be willing to shoot their own neighbors for no real reason.
If this is real and if attempted, you would end up with a Civil War. A large part of the Military and National Guard would change sides and I believe the same is true of the Police.
I'm just not buying it. The logistics are impossible.
Originally posted by questioningall
link to govt. site:
www.govtrack.us...
Here is more information on the bill. The person who has sponsored it is:
Rep. Alcee Hastings [D-FL] - a democrat - obviously
Originally posted by Psychonaughty
Originally posted by cluckerspud
Central Scrutinizer:
The white zone is for loading and unloading.
If you have to load or unload, please use to the white zone.
The truth is that these faculties could be beneficial with the side effect of wrong doings without legal restraints. It would work for both good/bad entities and all should be savvy about the passing of this bill.
In my honest opinion it won't pass for a very long time if it even gets close.
-Psycho
Originally posted by questioningall
Looks like the Congress is about to take serious steps with the FEMA camps.
A new bill has been introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives called the National Emergency Centers Act or HR 645.
I find this unbelievable, I would have thought the FEMA camps were more of an undercover type operation, but it seems it is not.
This bill if passed into law will direct the Secretary of Homeland Security to establish national emergency centers otherwise known as FEMA camp facilities on military installations. This is an incredibly disturbing piece of legislation considering that the powers that be have already set in motion an agenda to setup a nationwide marital law apparatus through U.S. Northern Command and the Department of Homeland Security.
I am starting to get convinced that it does not matter who is in control of Congress and the Senate - we are going to get screwed either way.
I truely thought the Congress kept going along with Bush, as they didn't have enough votes to ever over ride him, but I am being proven wrong.
The fact, they are introducing this bill, is scary.
Even though we already know that detention facilities are already in place, they now want to legalize the construction of FEMA camps on military installations using the ever popular excuse that the facilities are for the purposes of a national emergency.
Here is Section 2 of the bill being introduced:
SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF NATIONAL EMERGENCY CENTERS.
(a) In General- In accordance with the requirements of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall establish not fewer than 6 national emergency centers on military installations.
(b) Purpose of National Emergency Centers- The purpose of a national emergency center shall be to use existing infrastructure--
(1) to provide temporary housing, medical, and humanitarian assistance to individuals and families dislocated due to an emergency or major disaster;
(2) to provide centralized locations for the purposes of training and ensuring the coordination of Federal, State, and local first responders;
(3) to provide centralized locations to improve the coordination of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts of government, private, and not-for-profit entities and faith-based organizations; and
(4) to meet other appropriate needs, as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security.
It also says, the Secretary of Homeland Security can not set up any fewer than 6 centers on the bases. It continues to say, they can do anything they deem is neccessary at those facilities.
Link to article: www.roguegovernment.com...
Section 3 is very long, but you can read it at the above link. I will insert it, if mods say it is ok.
Originally posted by questioningall
Here is more information on the bill. The person who has sponsored it is:
Rep. Alcee Hastings [D-FL] - a democrat - obviously
Originally posted by cluckerspud
Central Scrutinizer:
The white zone is for loading and unloading.
If you have to load or unload, please use to the white zone.