It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Whats going on at yellowstone?

page: 97
510
<< 94  95  96    98  99  100 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 05:48 PM
link   
reply to post by Nightowl
 


Well good, that's what I'm hoping, that it's just wind. If things continue to taper off, we may be out of the storm for now. But what a wild ride it's been.



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 06:15 PM
link   
Thursday, January 1, 2009 07:57 MST (Thursday, January 1, 2009 14:57 UTC)


Volcano Alert Level: NORMAL
Aviation Color Code: GREEN

Earthquake Summary:

Yellowstone seismicity increased significantly in December 2008 due to an energetic earthquake swarm that commenced on December 26. This swarm, a sequence of earthquakes clustered in space and time, is occurring beneath the northern part of Yellowstone Lake in Yellowstone National Park. As of this writing, the largest of these earthquakes was a magnitude 3.9 at 10:15 pm MST on Dec. 27. Through 5:00 pm MST on Dec. 31, the sequence had included 12 events of magnitude 3.0 to 3.9 and approximately 20 of magnitude 2.5 to 2.9, with a total of at least 400 events large enough to be located (magnitude ~1 or larger). National Park Service (NPS) employees and visitors have reported feeling the largest of these earthquakes in the area around Yellowstone Lake and at Old Faithful and Grant Village.

The hypocenters of the swarm events cluster along a north-south-trending zone that is about 7 km long. The vast majority of the focal depths are shallower than 5 km. It is not possible to identify a causative fault of other feature without further analysis.

Analysts are currently processing the backlog of seismic data from these events. The current analyst-processed catalog is believed to include all events of magnitude 2.5 and greater through Dec 31 at 5 pm MST, but hundreds of earthquakes remain to be processed. The total of more than 400 locatable events is based on automatically-determined locations and magnitudes for the swarm events.

The December 2008 earthquake sequence is the most intense in this area for some years. No damage has been reported within Yellowstone National Park, nor would any be expected from earthquakes of this size. The swarm is in a region of historical earthquake activity and is close to areas of Yellowstone famous hydrothermal activity. Similar earthquake swarms have occurred in the past in Yellowstone without triggering steam explosions or volcanic activity. Nevertheless, there is some potential for hydrothermal explosions and earthquakes may continue or increase in magnitude. There is a much lower potential for related volcanic activity.

The National Park Service in Yellowstone has been kept fully informed of the ongoing seismic activity via electronic means and by phone contacts with the University of Utah and the U.S. Geological Survey USGS). The Wyoming Office of Homeland Security is reviewing Earthquake Response Plans and monitoring seismic activity.

Earthquakes are a common occurrence in the Yellowstone National Park area, an active volcanic-tectonic area averaging 1,000 to 2,000 earthquakes a year. Yellowstone's 10,000 geysers and hot springs are the result of this geologic activity.


Full report here



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 06:25 PM
link   
So finally even they admit this might result in a disaster! But is it just me or wouldn't everyone just be like well it isn't the super volcanic eruption so all is safe. Some people might not even know what they are talking about!



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 06:26 PM
link   

Originally posted by Nightowl
There's been talk recently that the Yellowstone graphs look like they have harmonic tremors, but I think the graph results are actually the result of strong winds right now. Strong wind readings on a seismograph can be confused with harmonic tremors, as this site explains: GeoNet - Seismic Monitoring of Volcanoes

It's very windy in Yellowstone right now, gusts of up to 55mph.


The talk of the harmonics was when there was no wind. But we have had some rather informative posts on them throughout the thread. Some of which we were able to compare to other readings.



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 06:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by LoneInDarkness
So finally even they admit this might result in a disaster! But is it just me or wouldn't everyone just be like well it isn't the super volcanic eruption so all is safe. Some people might not even know what they are talking about!



But at least they are letting people know of the "potential" perhaps this is another easing into release????
Then again mabe they are just covering their purverbial behinds

because they dont know what to make of it either????

[edit on 1-1-2009 by xoxo stacie]



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 06:34 PM
link   
Is anybody of you using that cool GEE program able to display pseudo-realtime seismic data from US.LKWY station? I can't. At the moment I'm displaying data from TA.H17A and TA.H18A which are the closest to it.



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 06:34 PM
link   
reply to post by xoxo stacie
 



I would say the later. lol! they are trying to cover their asses.

I'll bet there will be some half baked attempt to let people know on a more public scale, like maybe alert level warnings.

Not sure, but it's a hunch.



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 06:37 PM
link   
reply to post by violet
 


I just noticed that this is a reprint of the earlier report.....

okay i now have 2 lines teeeheee



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 06:44 PM
link   
I have been using a website for a few years now, maybe it will be useful to some of you. www.Global Disaster Watch ... sorry I can't seem to link it



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 06:46 PM
link   
Has anyone been looking at the IRIS data? The graphs are different.
www.iris.edu...
You can also look different frequencies

www.iris.edu...

first is at 80Hz second is at 40Hz



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 06:49 PM
link   
Good news article

"Yellowstone Supervolcano - When should we start to worry?" Jan 1, 2009
Read Here

Recent Earthquakes in the Intermountain West Yellowstone National Park Special Map
Link Here

.



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 06:57 PM
link   
Lovely, in essence that article says we are screwd.... Oh man that just made my day. Who cares about the economic crisis when your country is going to blow up lol!

No seriously now, the chances of it happening our slim. The earthquakes may prove to us something is in the works but as for a full scale eruption I do not think so just yet... but evidence can change my mind.



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 07:01 PM
link   
reply to post by TrainDispatcher
 


Good article.

And breakdown, thanks for posting.


newsblaze.com...

Dear Ian:

It's not that there's been ~ 300 quakes since Saturday or even that they're all within a mile or two of each other, the worrisome part is that they are all within a few hundred yards of each other vertically, extending from the surface down to 7.2 km potentially defining a single "chimney" under high pressure causing hydraulic fracturing along its entire length, (www.seis.utah.edu... ). The National Park Service reports the magma chamber is as shallow as 8 km and if the major chamber is that close to the chimney reaching to 7.2 km, we may be in for an eruption.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.








posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 07:09 PM
link   

Earthquake swarms at Long Valley Caldera caused concerns a few years ago but there was no eruption. Earthquake swarms are not necessarily followed by eruptions of any kind. They are normal. There is a very specific type of low frequency seismic signature called volcanic tremor that is associated with rising magma. That was not reported at Long Valley and it hasn't been reported at Yellowstone. Long Valley is a caldera system similar to Yellowstone that had the most recent "supervolcano" eruption. As huge as that eruption was, it did not wipe out life or change the climate.



www.huliq.com...

According to this article, everything will be ok?



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 07:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by xoxo stacie
They are somewhat crunched up. If you can save a chart and enlarge it in a photo type program they seperate out into a perfect line of rises and dips.


Sorry, but this is bad information.

Unlike the "super image processing" crap on CSI and the like, you can't just increase the size of a given image and expect more (correct) data to suddenly appear.

The only way to prove "Harmonic" vs "High Frequency" tremors (or whatever they are called) would be to find data (preferably something other than a graphic) and re-plot and do the math on that.

The data that is provided by Helicorders is nice to look at, but you can't extrapolate anything more detailed than what is provided.

-K



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 07:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Realtruth
reply to post by TrainDispatcher
 


Good article.

And breakdown, thanks for posting.


newsblaze.com...

Dear Ian:

It's not that there's been ~ 300 quakes since Saturday or even that they're all within a mile or two of each other, the worrisome part is that they are all within a few hundred yards of each other vertically, extending from the surface down to 7.2 km potentially defining a single "chimney" under high pressure causing hydraulic fracturing along its entire length, (www.seis.utah.edu... ). The National Park Service reports the magma chamber is as shallow as 8 km and if the major chamber is that close to the chimney reaching to 7.2 km, we may be in for an eruption.

Please visit the link provided for the complete story.




Well that is disturbing.

Really disturbing.


[edit on 1/1/09 by SevenandFive]



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 07:16 PM
link   
At about 01:13 UTC 2008/01/02 on GEE something bigger than the average of quakes in the last few hours just occurred. It should appear in a few minutes on UUSS websites.

EDIT here it is:

2.5 2009/01/01 18:13:05 44.551N 110.364W 0.1 60 km (37 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT


[edit on 2009/1/1 by Shirakawa]



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 07:21 PM
link   
woot

finally saw my first earthquake using GEE


01:13 GMT


I am gonna guess somehwere are 2.0 -2.5???

[edit on 1-1-2009 by RickinVa]



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 07:23 PM
link   
reply to post by RickinVa
 


And there's an even bigger spike on 01:21 UTC!
Two lines.

[edit on 2009/1/1 by Shirakawa]



posted on Jan, 1 2009 @ 07:23 PM
link   
I am guessing given how big it looks on the graph. Who knows though I may be wrong.




top topics



 
510
<< 94  95  96    98  99  100 >>

log in

join