It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by westcoast
They are NOT deliberately removing quakes. Would you like me to send you a wave file and just see if you could remove one? Only joking, but joking apart it would not be easy. Then, if it was a 3.4 it would show on several recorders and some would be on different networks. UUSS contract for YVO but the PB recorders are completely different. It could not be done. Sorry, I know this is a conspiracy site but I am very convinced they could not remove something fro the trace. You also have to bear in mind that they know we are watching!
They could never get away with since they have no idea who is looking at GEE and/or recording it, or looking at plots or seismos in the BUD data centre, or downloading waveforms using Vase or JWEED or the myriad other data tools there are out there. The chances of them getting caught with their pants down are huge.
What we do need to know is WHAT triggers these darned silly computers to falsely report? I have asked Jake at the YVO but he does not know as these are, as I said, run for the YVO by UUSS. By the way he also said that they (YVO) get paged over 2.5 mag so you have that to contend with as well.
Currently this looks like some piece of software has these quakes in the buffer at UUSS. The USGS computer takes then out, and then the UUSS one feeds them back in again since it thinks they are missing. The 3.4 is currently in the list so I am expecting it to be deleted soon and then put back in again. It is fairly obvious that this is two computer systems getting confused. Poor dears, they do get confused easily!
Edit: There you go round 18. Now out of the list. Wait 5 minutes and it will be back in again I bet.
edit on 7/2/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)
Yellowstone supervolcano, new Ice Age could topple US government
As evidence mounts that the world may fast be slipping into the next Ice Age, Washington insiders are hurrying to solidify a new power base for centralized government operations.
Fears that the US capital might be struck by another more deadly terrorist attack—or other disasters—prompted agencies a decade ago to hurriedly establish back-up operations in case catastrophe struck.
Good morning Jeremy,
I have put a message on the webs on both USGS and UUSS about the Yellowstone earthquakes, there are 4 of them, that are making everyone giddy yo-yoing in and out of the listings. Since they first appeared on the 5th Feb they have subsequently been in and out of the listings 43 times at the time of writing.
At first I thought I had a problem with my data collection software but on checking if found that they are going through a cycle of being put in/taken out.
Here are two sample 7 days file attached.
It is still going on as I write.
These are the 4 earthquakes
Date/Time UTC,Latitude,Longitude,Magnitude,Depth(Km),Location
2011-02-05T08:59:35.000Z,44.55210,-110.92210,3.4000,12.4000,Yellowstone National Park. Wyoming
2011-02-04T21:46:13.000Z,44.73110,-110.52450,2.6000,3.8000,Yellowstone National Park. Wyoming
2011-02-04T21:13:10.000Z,44.78410,-111.01760,2.6000,0.9000,Yellowstone National Park. Wyoming
2011-02-04T21:12:21.000Z,44.57080,-110.71680,2.0000,11.4000,Yellowstone National Park. Wyoming
I have also marked them in one of the text files with ****
Whilst I don't suppose that USGS is the least bit concerned with losing credibility with the members of ATS I would suggest that in other organisations, that collect data from USGS, there must be some raised eyebrows!
This really needs to be sorted
Best regards
More worrisome is the possibly impending Ice Age. It may not materialize. If it doesn't, Denver remains the best location. Conversely, an Ice Age may come, but only the so-called mini-Ice Age. A small Ice Age would probably present an inconvenience and task logisticians, but it's workable.
A full-blown, major Ice Age, though, is definitely a game-changer. The entire region would have to be abandoned and the city of Denver—and most of northern Colorado—written off for as long as several thousand years, maybe more.
For now, the decision is to wait it out.
And the steaming, burning Yellowstone caldera dome is rising at a faster pace than ever recorded in history—an ominous sign that it might indeed erupt.
There are those citizens that would celebrate the idea of getting rid of the federal government—especially such unpopular institutions as the IRS, EPA and BLM. But with any kind of sober reflection most rational individuals would have to conclude that a disaster leading to total anarchy—a Mad Max type of country—is really not something to desire in any shape or form.
This can be accomplished in a variety of different ways through the use of HAARP. Once the caldera is cracked in one place and the magma is forced out through pressures created by HAARP......
Thanks for reporting this discrepancy. One of our web servers had fallen out of sync. We are repairing the problem, and the 4 quakes should not reappear in your feed.
Originally posted by PuterMan
reply to post by PuterMan
Reply from USGS
Thanks for reporting this discrepancy. One of our web servers had fallen out of sync. We are repairing the problem, and the 4 quakes should not reappear in your feed.
Like I said first of all - software problems. Sorry, no conspiracy!
edit on 8/2/2011 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)
But how do I know you aren't CIA.
I don't.
And if you were you wouldn't admit it.
Since I have no proof you aren't, there is a possibilty, no matter how remote or improbable.
Maybe you've been placed here to calm us here, the ones with the tinfoil hats. Distracting us and counteracting our claims.
With my tongue in cheek for too long, I must now stop before I clamp down too hard as I giggle.
You only lose face when your actions or mistakes are made public, and are common knowledge.
Peter Cervelli from the YVO confessed he lurked out here. You think he's the only one?