Whats going on at yellowstone?

reply to post by xoxo stacie


I am sorry, I am not up to speed on what I am suppose to see in the information you provided. Sorry, to be so uninformed about these things.

But what does that information actually tell us?

reply to post by PuterMan


quake.usgs.gov...

Very basic explanations...look at example links..I'd like his answers better though

reply to post by quakewatcher


I have to agree with questioningall that those are not the same. They look different than EQ clouds.
They look more like this...... like waves of energy.

farm4.static.flickr.com...

reply to post by xoxo stacie


Thanks for that Stacey, thats a great set of data covering 10 years. Just got to figure it out now!

The page that leads to that data is:

quake.wr.usgs.gov...

Originally post by questioningall

Okay, I am inserting the pictures from the website you mentioned above right now...

Went to brush my teeth. Slap my forehead (well, figuratively). "Chemtrails?" Come back and cloud pictures are posted. Yep, one of the same patterns caused by chemtrails. It's depop, Peoples. Maybe New Madrid, that would take out a lot. Yellowstone would be so messy, but then these people ARE crazy.

Some paid type is going to try to misdirect everyone with "mackerel skies," but they don't look the same, the dispersal pattern is different, they look synthetic. Oh yeah, and they're preceded by voluminous chemtrails.

"The problems will always be there and there's going to be a crisis which will come along on the 21st, 22nd of January that we don't even know about right now."
--Colin Powell

..."guarantee" of a "generated crisis" to "test the mettle" of the new leader within six months of the new presidential term.
--Joe Biden

Bring it on, shills!

reply to post by Hx3_1963


quake.wr.usgs.gov...

The dough definitely seems to be rising!

reply to post by PuterMan


You're doing a fantastic job, it would be useful in the end to put together all this information you're getting from those guys as it's scientifical and official!

reply to post by Spell2Speak


Not quite sure what you are driving at but if by chemtrails you are meaning con trails, that they are not.

Pull on a thread, out pops a shill.

Stupid one-liner rule.

Originally posted by greshnik
reply to post by VX-7R

 

If that is all "man made" and "wind" noise, why is it showing only now, not before in the records? I think that others have already discussed this, in detail...it is easy to compare records with past records and see that these theories of "wind" and other noise simply do not explain the trends. They just don't.

What particular signals are you seeing now that have never shown up before? And how do you show that they're new or unique? I haven't been able to access a lot of really old data to be able to show whether something is unprecedented or not.

What I have seen of "wind noise", which has terrified some people on here over the last few weeks looks just as we'd expect wind to look. It looks just like the examples of wind noise shown in one of the FAQs about seismogram interpretation. (If only I had that link!)

The very even-amplitude signals that go from zero to their full value almost instantly, remain at that level, then switch off again instantly, which were also scaring people look to me to be man-made.

I'm no expert on any of this, but a bit of observation begins to show how "real" events look as opposed to signals that appear to be man-caused or wind noise.

I wish I had saved some important links.

There is one site that shows examples of various seismometer signals and then gives explanations of what they are. I can't find it now, but the wind and man-made artifacts were dead-ringers for the signals I'm talking about. If someone has that link again, I'd be grateful to see it posted.

I thought that this site, which uses the raw data from two seismograph locations near Mount Saint Helens, speeding it up, and then presenting it as WAV files is interesting.

www.skywise711.com...

Scroll down to the WAV files. They're interesting and a bit eerie to listen to.

At the top, the site states that what you're hearing is NOT harmonic tremor, but they must have earlier thought that it was.

In any case, I tend to think that most of us are pretty good at interpreting sounds, but a lot less good at interpreting printouts of waveforms.

I have a lot of years of staring at oscilloscopes when troubleshooting and designing electronic circuits. Some of it while also listening to the waveforms. So I may tend to at least *believe* that I can recognize certain patterns in viewed waveforms.

But the ear-brain is an amazing tool for evaluating patterns. It's astounding how well we can pick out signals from deep amongst noise. And we can locate on the positions of noise sources with amazing accuracy and speed.

In any case, I'd love to be able to convert some of what we've been seeing lately in YSNP to audio files. I'll bet that we'd get pretty good at recognizing patterns and evaluating things if we could only be listening to these charts instead of viewing them.

I think the wind and the man made events would stick out like a sore thumb and the "real" earthquakes and such would be easily "heard".

I've looked at the discussion and tutorials about the formatting of the RAW data and I'd love to have the time to write a VB app for Windows for us to use on that data, but it's a daunting task.

I'm supposed to be working on paying jobs right now ;-)

I just hate to see us get distracted from things that might be very important by spending too much time on things that are probably normal. That's all.

reply to post by Spell2Speak



I know this is a conspiracy website. But chemtrails? I do not personally believe in these, however if they did exist I don't understand how they could cause Yellowstone to blow or the New Madrid fault to split. I thought chemtrails were just supposed to control us all through respiratory diseases and population control chemicals or some such thing. That at least might be scientifically possible (if highly improbable.)

I think I agree with logic guy. (or girl) What is more likely, that these are cirrus clouds, or that they have been seeded by some secret government agency with some kind of science fiction substance that can cause earthquakes?

Occam's razor. All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best.

Yellowstone is a volcano, and New Madrid is a fault, and the earth is more powerful than any government. Should anything happen with either of these things, it's highly illogical to conclude that the gubmint did it.

And the water is still rising!

waterdata.usgs.gov...

And the temperature is falling (a little bit)

and 3 degrees F at Lake Yellowstone, WY
Winds are . The pressure is and the humidity is %. The wind chill is -17. Last Updated on Jan 14, .

And I have no idea what all this means - I will leave it up to you clever guys and gals to figure out.

Originally posted by quakewatcher
reply to post by Spell2Speak

 

I know this is a conspiracy website. But chemtrails? I do not personally believe in these, however if they did exist I don't understand how they could cause Yellowstone to blow or the New Madrid fault to split. I thought chemtrails were just supposed to control us all through respiratory diseases and population control chemicals or some such thing. That at least might be scientifically possible (if highly improbable.)

I think I agree with logic guy. (or girl) What is more likely, that these are cirrus clouds, or that they have been seeded by some secret government agency with some kind of science fiction substance that can cause earthquakes?

Occam's razor. All other things being equal, the simplest solution is the best.

Yellowstone is a volcano, and New Madrid is a fault, and the earth is more powerful than any government. Should anything happen with either of these things, it's highly illogical to conclude that the gubmint did it.

You know far better than I how chemtrails are used in conjunction with HAARP.

reply to post by PuterMan


So it is sliding to the south on a rising mound...hhhmmm

reply to post by PuterMan



wow iam impressed. good job puter man

reply to post by PuterMan


Thank you, puterman!

I know, I know. The dreaded one-liner. But seriously, I'm very much enjoying reading some feedback from the real people up there doing the work.

It's a breath of fresh air.

Originally posted by Spell2Speak


You know far better than I how chemtrails are used in conjunction with HAARP.

I thought I was a stay at home mom from Tacoma Washington with an unhealthy fascination for earthquakes. But apparently I am a paid shill for a vast government conspiracy. In which case, they owe me a whole bunch of money.


Dr. Lowenstern, please take a break from planting that C4 along the rim of the caldera, and get somebody in payroll on the line.

[edit on 14-1-2009 by quakewatcher]

reply to post by VX-7R


here is one, is this what U are referring to ?
www.isthisthingon.org...

YSB & YMP action is showing a little to the west...so it ain't all local human activity...TSG or The Mush Pots?

Ok, I thought these clouds were very interesting and different on Monday.
I took the videos, as I had been reading about clouds and earthquakes and volcanos. Clouds from what one expert says - can show up 30 days in advance of an earthquake that shows the earth emitting gases etc. I have then thought maybe Yellowstone is emitting gases, vaporization that could cause the clouds to look as they did on Monday. Look at that weather.com pic, I provided in another post earlier. The clouds even in the thick of the snow/rain still showed separation even in the satellite.

Here are 2 videos I took.