It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Locoman8
reply to post by ecain
True, but the bible easily points out that it wasn't in the winter time.
-Shepherds were living in the fields tending to their flocks.
-Agustus Caeaser issued out a census for all of Judea, Galille, and Samaria. Joseph and Mary had to journey from Nazareth to Bethlehem.... in the winter time the roads would have been non-passible.
-There was no room at the inn.... wouldn't be a problem in the winter time. It was a festival or feast.... like the feast of tabernacles when many came from all around to camp out at the temple mount.
It's things like this that bring a more reasonable approach than stars and planets.
Jesus said John the Baptist was "Elijah" and the Jewish custom was that Elijah would return on passover. So if John was born on passover.... and he was six months older than Jesus, Jesus would have been born on the feast of Tabernacles. This is my formula for determining the birth of Christ. This also puts His conception on the festival of lights or chaunnaka. The opening chapters of John's Gospel account mentions the "Light of the world" or the "Light of heaven"..... using the idea of light to represent Jesus.
Don't mean to ramble on, just thought you would like these interesting facts and coincidences.