It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by moocowman
To be honest, I use PC more for effect (in relation to the religious argument) than my personal opinion, it appears to be 2 edged sword unfortunately.
A worker (in the UK) has to protect him/her, laws relating to sexuality, colour , race, disability, religion etc.
However when religious people are given the right to practice their religion without predjudice, the enivitable will occur but not always.
I will use christianity as an example, a mixed bunch of people in an office each have their rights, however the christian will claim that part of his religion is to recruit (for want of a better word) other people.
Unfortunately the other people ar gay or lesbian and have every right to be offended by any allegations of immorality or condemnations such as "abomination" for the way they choose to live.
PC It would seem, will attempt to shut the christian up (and rightly so) he should keep his condemnations to himself. But there seems to be this conflict between religious freedom and respecting other peoples diversity in life choices.
On a personal level i wouldn't even entertain the thought of employing a christian, there are more gays, lesbians and bisexuals in the UK than fundamentalist christians, and who needs lawsuits in the workplace ?
Unfortuantely there seems to be many homosexual christians wo what the hell arre you supposed to do ?
Perhaps the golden rule should be -
"Thou shalt not take offence" ?
then leave everything else to slander and libel laws.
Originally posted by moocowman
Here's the problem dude, how can any individual respect another person that believes a book which is fraught with contradiction and error, authors unkown. That tells the individual that the lifestyle of such and such is an abomination and illegal in their mind, punishiable by eternal torture or stoning to death, depending on how the reader interprets it ?
I personally find women with tatooes quite repulsive and I enjoy the fredom to say and think so. However I do not in any way shape or form have any right to try to prevent women having tatooes. What is totally repulsive is that, if my opinion was based on someone elses' belief and I was commanded to think this way and would not only go out of my way to condemn these women but endevour to create laws to prevent them from having tatooes.
Having an opinion be it negative or positive on the way someone chooses to live is a far cry from trying to force mythalogical morals upon him.
I really don't believe xtians in general realise how repulsive their delusion is.
Originally posted by moocowman
I fail to see how i'm being hypocrytical, I don't in anyway refuse an xtian to live as they see fit.
However I would given the oportunity, take a measured response to their insistance on imposing their delusion upon myself or that of my children.
Perhaps, (in relation to homosexuality) the question should be asked of christians - If the oportunity arose, to make homosexuality illegal would they agree and have it that way?
Perhaps this question could warrant a thread of its' own but I feel there are enough of on the subject.
So there you go I'll throw it out there, if your a Christian and had the oportunity would you make homosexuality illegal ?
Have and sure is, thanks. I understand, S.K. uses smaller more simple words and the same plot over and over again, the dark half/secret window the mist/langoliers, blah blah. I was not speaking of creepiness anyway.
Is your argument that claiming to not be fiction is all it takes to be true?
Does the bible claim to be 100% true? Even after all the editing and translating and silly stories of adam and eve?
Originally posted by Thurisaz
People seem to forget one thing...
Christ came over 2000 years ago
The wisdom of Christ was well beyond and before his time. One cannot read the parables without seeing the absolute wisdom in them.
That what was spoken 2000 years ago is still applicable today.
Do I believe in Christ? Absolutely!
I feel very sad to even consider hatred being directed at someone who was innocent and suffered to help others.
Generally, people hate those who speak the truth, why? Because people don't want the truth.
I had a meditation about my own death. And I spoke with Death and
Death said, confess your sins. I was surprised to see that I had to speak
to Death in order for me to live again or the conditions of my next life. I
thought for a long time and wasnt sure
what I should say. I then said, well I have none because Christ died for
me, I was washed clean in the blood of the Lamb. It is with regret I have
none because someone had to die in order for me to be free of my guilt,
and my shame. I then saw Death turn into Christ and he looked relieved
that I didn't have any sins to confess. He didn't have to suffer for me
ever again.
Originally posted by crazyjames65
after reading an article on "the Christian post" in washington DC there will be buses with signs on them, "no God" .
To me thats like taking Christmas away from all of the people, and
then I ask myself again why do so many hate Jesus? That was Jesus
birthday and some people want to take it away!
Originally posted by crazyjames65
it is aparent to me that this is a atheist site and I will remove myself because I do not belong here. When ever I figure out how to delete my
account.
Originally posted by crazyjames65
after reading an article on "the Christian post" in washington DC there will be buses with signs on them, "no God" .
To me thats like taking Christmas away from all of the people, and
then I ask myself again why do so many hate Jesus? That was Jesus
birthday and some people want to take it away!