It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It has been measured. Over time. Over time the same scenarios, and "coincidences" have occurred and they were recorded. In time the ancients began to predict with certain accuracy the probability that certain things would again occur. In that way you can measure it. And yes, the 12 hours would make a difference. My birth of my daughter took 56 hours, but her birth moment did not change. I did not pick that hour and time, she did. In Astrological thinking the soul does not enter this world until birth, and for some reason the ancients chose the moment of birth as the deciding factor, and that is where you may argue with me because I have questions about that too. The United States Birth Chart is July 4th, 1776, and she is a Cancer Sun. They do charts on events, and there is not always a birth time, just a date. You would be very very similar to someone born the same day as you. Especially in the same year and such. But within a different year the two birth dates could be very different with different Mercury and Venus and Moon and Risings.
Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by seagrass
But you can measure the effects of magnetism and of gravity, you can't even detect the things you say effect each individual in completely different ways with astrology. Run two horoscopes for the same location and date but just change the time by 12 hours or so, do you mean to tell me that there is some meaningful way the planets really effect my whole life with those 12 hours of seperation? What if my birth actually took 16 hours to happen? Wouldn't the planets be working their magic on me the whole time? Why would only that one piece of time/space determine so much of my lifestyle?
I know I won't convince you, I'm not really trying. I am just showing and your are conceding that there is no physical proof of what astrology attempts to explain. You can have your belief, I have mine.
I don't Pavil. I have dealt with astrological skeptics my whole life. I enjoy your questions. I agree, we take what we want from things like this. I just have a bone to pick with typical "horoscope" comments and wish to educate the public on the difference between Astrology and the pop culture newspaper version. The various types have their merits. Years, as in Chinese Astrology, would relate more to the slower planets like Uranus and Neptune which are more generational in nature, although I believe they use a more cyclic theroy to describe the years. The Chinese developed their own astrology, and the Western version is certainly not "Western" in any respect. It's much older than that. The horizon is reversed and latitude and longitude are used in all charts to map the sky. The Ephemeris is used by both Astrologers and Astronomers, as the planets are predicted to be in certain places well into the future and can be traced well into the past based on their mathmatical movements. There are typically/statistically more people born under a Virgo Rising in the Northern, while Pisces Risings are more common in the Southern. I would probably be more at home in the Southern Hemisphere because I am a Pisces Rising. I would find more like me there.
Originally posted by pavil
reply to post by seagrass
Don't take my non belief in Astrology as anything directed toward you, I assure you it's not. I just tend to think that Astrology is just one of those "belive the parts that you agree with" kind of things. We all tend to find things that we can relate to in things, I think Zodiac signs are typical of this kind of behavior.
Do the Various systems of Astrology around the world seem to jive? By that does for example the Western and Chinese signs for the same months have the same traits? If they are only good for the area in which they are developed, then why would Western Astrology or Chinese even apply to the Western Hemisphere? Are the signs reversed in the Southern Hemisphere? I would tend to think they should be, given the different alignment of the Earth?
Just curious questions.
check to see how many planets you have in the "loner, unconventional" sign of Aquarius. It may be diluting the Pisces Sun.
Originally posted by kindred
I'm a pisces, born March 19th. The description is about 70% accurate. I'm interested in Buddhism, I'm also an artist, day dreamer, truth seeker, very spiritual and open minded. However I definitely wouldn't call myself popular, as I'm more of a loner and black sheep of the family. I find it hard to relate to most people, mainly because I'm not driven by my ego and I couldn't careless about wealth, success or fame. I hate celebs and the worship of them. I just can't see what all the fuss is about. I'd be more than happy if I was living on a exotic tropical island all by myself. Now that would be paradise.
I don't really know what to make of astrology. I'm not really comfortable with the idea, that all our lives are somehow predetermined. I just can't see the point of existence if that were the case. I subscribe to the philosophy that we are the sum of our thoughts, what you think is what you are.
Astrologically speaking they would be quite similar. If not identical. They would have the same planets in the same sign and the rising would most likely be the same as well. The moon would be in a different degree, and could in some cases be in a different sign, but that would be rare. The moon goes through all twelve signs in a month. The rising in all twelve signs in a day. The sun in all twelve in a year. The twins may have been very similar in the beginning, but with time developed different expressions of the same energy. Something I like to call good cop, bad cop. One could have been the outgoing Leo who loves the spotlight, one can be the quiet one that wants it, but doesn't let you know that. Many psychological things can happen to twins. Wanting to be different is one of them. Perhaps they wanted some individuality from each other and so chose different ways to express the same energies. Someone who enjoys wine can become an drunk, while the other a collector or wine maker. That is a matter of the souls choosing. Like I said before, astrology points out possible energies. Potentials from those energies. It never states a fact. It never says "this will happen". It says "this may occur, or this". It is never absolute. But oftentimes "this did occur", and "yep, I am like that".
Originally posted by kindred
Well I'm not into astrology, so I don't have a clue what you mean. Could you be more specific. You say that two people born at the same time would more than likely be the same. So what about twins. I knew some identical twins at school who were completely different personality wise and they lived and grew up together.
Left handers = smarter people